Voß S, Glaßer S, Hoffmann T, Beuing O, Weigand S, Jachau K, Preim B, Thévenin D, Janiga G, Berg P
Department of Fluid Dynamics and Technical Flows, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Simulation and Graphics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:9854539. doi: 10.1155/2016/9854539. Epub 2016 Sep 18.
Computational Fluid Dynamics is intensively used to deepen the understanding of aneurysm growth and rupture in order to support physicians during therapy planning. However, numerous studies considering only the hemodynamics within the vessel lumen found no satisfactory criteria for rupture risk assessment. To improve available simulation models, the rigid vessel wall assumption has been discarded in this work and patient-specific wall thickness is considered within the simulation. For this purpose, a ruptured intracranial aneurysm was prepared ex vivo, followed by the acquisition of local wall thickness using CT. The segmented inner and outer vessel surfaces served as solid domain for the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. To compare wall stress distributions within the aneurysm wall and at the rupture site, FSI computations are repeated in a virtual model using a constant wall thickness approach. Although the wall stresses obtained by the two approaches-when averaged over the complete aneurysm sac-are in very good agreement, strong differences occur in their distribution. Accounting for the real wall thickness distribution, the rupture site exhibits much higher stress values compared to the configuration with constant wall thickness. The study reveals the importance of geometry reconstruction and accurate description of wall thickness in FSI simulations.
计算流体动力学被广泛用于加深对动脉瘤生长和破裂的理解,以便在治疗规划过程中为医生提供支持。然而,许多仅考虑血管腔内血流动力学的研究并未找到令人满意的破裂风险评估标准。为了改进现有的模拟模型,本研究摒弃了刚性血管壁假设,并在模拟中考虑了患者特异性的壁厚。为此,对一个破裂的颅内动脉瘤进行了离体准备,随后使用CT获取局部壁厚。分割后的血管内表面和外表面作为流固耦合(FSI)模拟的固体域。为了比较动脉瘤壁内和破裂部位的壁应力分布,在一个虚拟模型中使用恒定壁厚方法重复进行FSI计算。尽管两种方法得到的壁应力——在整个动脉瘤囊上平均时——非常吻合,但它们的分布存在显著差异。考虑实际壁厚分布时,与恒定壁厚构型相比,破裂部位的应力值要高得多。该研究揭示了几何重建和在FSI模拟中准确描述壁厚的重要性。