Yan Xiaojing, Sun Liangliang, Zhu Guijie, Cox Olivia F, Dovichi Norman J
Department of Chemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Proteomics. 2016 Dec;16(23):2945-2952. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600262.
A tryptic digest generated from Xenopus laevis fertilized embryos was fractionated by RPLC. One set of 30 fractions was analyzed by 100-min CZE-ESI-MS/MS separations (50 h total instrument time), and a second set of 15 fractions was analyzed by 3-h UPLC-ESI-MS/MS separations (45 h total instrument time). CZE-MS/MS produced 70% as many protein IDs (4134 versus 5787) and 60% as many peptide IDs (22 535 versus 36 848) as UPLC-MS/MS with similar instrument time (50 h versus 45 h) but with 50 times smaller total consumed sample amount (1.5 μg versus 75 μg). Surprisingly, CZE generated peaks that were 25% more intense than UPLC for peptides that were identified by both techniques, despite the 50-fold lower loading amount; this high sensitivity reflects the efficient ionization produced by the electrokinetically pumped nanospray interface used in CZE. This report is the first comparison of CZE-MS/MS and UPLC-MS/MS for large-scale eukaryotic proteomic analysis. The numbers of protein and peptide identifications produced by CZE-ESI-MS/MS approach those produced by UPLC-MS/MS, but with nearly two orders of magnitude lower sample amounts.
对非洲爪蟾受精胚胎产生的胰蛋白酶消化产物进行反相液相色谱(RPLC)分级分离。一组30个级分通过100分钟的毛细管区带电泳-电喷雾串联质谱(CZE-ESI-MS/MS)分离进行分析(仪器总时间为50小时),另一组15个级分通过3小时的超高效液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱(UPLC-ESI-MS/MS)分离进行分析(仪器总时间为45小时)。在相似的仪器时间(50小时对45小时)下,CZE-MS/MS产生的蛋白质识别数为UPLC-MS/MS的70%(4134对5787),肽识别数为UPLC-MS/MS的60%(22535对36848),但总消耗样品量小50倍(1.5微克对75微克)。令人惊讶的是,对于两种技术都鉴定出的肽,CZE产生的峰强度比UPLC高25%,尽管上样量低50倍;这种高灵敏度反映了CZE中使用的电动泵纳米喷雾接口产生的高效电离。本报告是首次对CZE-MS/MS和UPLC-MS/MS用于大规模真核生物蛋白质组分析进行比较。CZE-ESI-MS/MS产生的蛋白质和肽识别数接近UPLC-MS/MS产生的识别数,但样品量低近两个数量级。