Hamani Clement, Lozano Andres M, Mazzone Paolo A M, Moro Elena, Hutchison William, Silburn Peter A, Zrinzo Ludvic, Alam Mesbah, Goetz Laurent, Pereira Erlick, Rughani Anand, Thevathasan Wesley, Aziz Tipu, Bloem Bastiaan R, Brown Peter, Chabardes Stephan, Coyne Terry, Foote Kelly, Garcia-Rill Edgar, Hirsch Etienne C, Okun Michael S, Krauss Joachim K
Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2016;94(5):307-319. doi: 10.1159/000449011. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
The pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN) region has received considerable attention in clinical studies as a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson disease. These studies have yielded variable results with an overall impression of improvement in falls and freezing in many but not all patients treated. We evaluated the available data on the surgical anatomy and terminology of the PPN region in a companion paper. Here we focus on issues concerning surgical technique, imaging, and early side effects of surgery. The aim of this paper was to gain more insight into the reasoning for choosing specific techniques and to discuss shortcomings of available studies. Our data demonstrate the wide range in almost all fields which were investigated. There are a number of important challenges to be resolved, such as identification of the optimal target, the choice of the surgical approach to optimize electrode placement, the impact on the outcome of specific surgical techniques, the reliability of intraoperative confirmation of the target, and methodological differences in postoperative validation of the electrode position. There is considerable variability both within and across groups, the overall experience with PPN DBS is still limited, and there is a lack of controlled trials. Despite these challenges, the procedure seems to provide benefit to selected patients and appears to be relatively safe. One important limitation in comparing studies from different centers and analyzing outcomes is the great variability in targeting and surgical techniques, as shown in our paper. The challenges we identified will be of relevance when designing future studies to better address several controversial issues. We hope that the data we accumulated may facilitate the development of surgical protocols for PPN DBS.
脚桥核(PPN)区域作为帕金森病深部脑刺激(DBS)的靶点在临床研究中受到了广泛关注。这些研究结果不一,总体印象是许多接受治疗的患者跌倒和冻结现象有所改善,但并非所有患者都是如此。在一篇配套论文中,我们评估了关于PPN区域手术解剖学和术语的现有数据。在此,我们重点关注手术技术、成像以及手术早期副作用等问题。本文的目的是更深入地了解选择特定技术的依据,并讨论现有研究的不足之处。我们的数据表明,几乎所有被研究的领域都存在很大差异。有许多重要挑战有待解决,例如确定最佳靶点、选择优化电极放置的手术入路、特定手术技术对结果的影响、术中靶点确认的可靠性以及术后电极位置验证的方法差异。组内和组间都存在相当大的变异性,PPN-DBS的总体经验仍然有限,并且缺乏对照试验。尽管存在这些挑战,但该手术似乎对部分患者有益,且相对安全。正如我们论文所示,在比较不同中心的研究和分析结果时,一个重要的局限性是靶点定位和手术技术存在很大差异。我们确定的这些挑战在设计未来研究以更好地解决几个有争议的问题时将具有相关性。我们希望我们积累的数据可能有助于PPN-DBS手术方案的制定。