Ataíde Aline Priscila, Fonseca Felipe Paiva, Santos Silva Alan Roger, Jorge Júnior Jacks, Lopes Márcio Ajudarte, Vargas Pablo Agustin
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Oral Pathology and Semiology Divisions, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;90:241-244. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 24.
Oral lesions affecting infants account for approximately 10% of all samples from diagnostic services and studies investigating the distribution of these lesions in pediatrics from different geographic areas are desired to improve the diagnostic knowledge of clinicians. Therefore, the aim of this study is to describe the distribution of oral lesions in a southeastern Brazilian population.
The oral pathology files of the University of Campinas was retrospectively reviewed for all cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 affecting patients 16-years-old and younger. Data on gender and diagnosis were retrieved from patients' oral pathology reports and included in a Microsoft Excel database.
Out of 34,138 cases, 2539 affected pediatric patients (7.4%) with a higher incidence in those with 13-16 years-old. Salivary gland disease was the most common group of lesions (37.1%), followed by mucosal pathology (13.6%) and odontogenic cysts (11.3%). Mucous extravasation cyst was the most common lesion (36.3%), followed by fibrous hyperplasia (5.6%) and dental follicle (5.2%). Dental lesions were uncommon (7.9%) and malignancies rare (0.4%).
Our results were similar to previous studies and the small differences observed were more likely result of methodological variability and characteristics of the service of origin from where samples were collected.
影响婴儿的口腔病变约占诊断服务所有样本的10%，开展不同地理区域儿科这些病变分布的研究有助于提高临床医生的诊断知识。因此，本研究旨在描述巴西东南部人群口腔病变的分布情况。
对坎皮纳斯大学2000年至2014年诊断的所有16岁及以下患者的口腔病理档案进行回顾性研究。从患者的口腔病理报告中检索性别和诊断数据，并纳入微软Excel数据库。
在34138例病例中，2539例为儿科患者（7.4%），13至16岁患者发病率更高。涎腺疾病是最常见的病变类型（37.1%），其次是黏膜病变（13.6%）和牙源性囊肿（11.3%）。黏液外渗性囊肿是最常见的病变（36.3%），其次是纤维增生（5.6%）和牙囊（5.2%）。牙齿病变不常见（7.9%），恶性肿瘤罕见（0.4%）。
我们的结果与先前研究相似，观察到的微小差异更可能是由于方法学差异以及样本采集来源机构的特点所致。
