Horsley Alex R, O'Neill Katherine, Downey Damian G, Elborn J Stuart, Bell Nicholas J, Smith Jaclyn, Owers-Bradley John
Institute of Inflammation and Repair, Education and Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Centre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
ERJ Open Res. 2016 Jan 22;2(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00042-2015. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Multiple breath wash-out (MBW) testing requires prior wash-in of inert tracer gas. Wash-in efficiency can be enhanced by a rebreathing tracer in a closed circuit. Previous attempts to deploy this did not account for the impact of CO accumulation on patients and were unsuccessful. We hypothesised that an effective rebreathe wash-in could be delivered and it would not alter wash-out parameters. Computer modelling was used to assess the impact of the rebreathe method on wash-in efficiency. Clinical testing of open and closed circuit wash-in-wash-out was performed in healthy controls and adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) using a circuit with an effective CO scrubber and a refined wash-in protocol. Wash-in efficiency was enhanced by rebreathing. There was no difference in mean lung clearance index between the two wash-in methods for controls (6.5 6.4; p=0.2, n=12) or patients with CF (10.9 10.8; p=0.2, n=19). Test time was reduced by rebreathe wash-in (156 230 s for CF patients, p<0.001) and both methods were well tolerated. End wash-in CO was maintained below 2% in most cases. Rebreathe-wash-in is a promising development that, when correctly deployed, reduces wash-in time and facilitates portable MBW testing. For mild CF, wash-out outcomes are equivalent to an open circuit.
多次呼气洗脱(MBW)测试需要预先吸入惰性示踪气体。通过在闭路中再呼吸示踪剂可提高吸入效率。以往尝试应用此方法时未考虑二氧化碳积聚对患者的影响,因而未成功。我们推测可以实现有效的再呼吸吸入,且不会改变洗脱参数。利用计算机建模评估再呼吸方法对吸入效率的影响。使用带有有效二氧化碳洗涤器和改进吸入方案的回路,对健康对照者和成年囊性纤维化(CF)患者进行开路和闭路吸入 - 洗脱的临床试验。通过再呼吸提高了吸入效率。对于对照者(6.5±6.4;p = 0.2,n = 12)或CF患者(10.9±10.8;p = 0.2,n = 19),两种吸入方法的平均肺清除指数无差异。再呼吸吸入减少了测试时间(CF患者为156±230秒,p<0.001),且两种方法耐受性良好。在大多数情况下,吸入结束时的二氧化碳水平维持在2%以下。再呼吸吸入是一项有前景的进展,正确应用时可减少吸入时间并便于进行便携式MBW测试。对于轻度CF,洗脱结果与开路相当。