Suppr超能文献

美白牙膏的效果:一项双盲随机对照试验。

Effect of whitening dentifrices: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Pintado-Palomino Karen, Vasconcelos Cecília Vilela Matias, Silva Roberto Juns da, Fressatti Andre Luiz de Macedo, Motta Bianka Jurca Gonçalves da, Pires-DE-Souza Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri, Tirapelli Camila

机构信息

Universidade de São Paulo (USP), School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Universidade de São Paulo (USP), School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2016 Oct 10;30(1):e82. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0082.

Abstract

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate tooth color changes (ΔE) and tooth sensitivity (TS) associated with whitening dentifrices. Sixty participants were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and then allocated to three groups (n = 20): Colgate Luminous White (G1), Close Up White Now (G2) and Sorriso dentifrice (G3-control). The participants were instructed to use only the provided dentifrice and toothbrush in standardized oral hygiene procedures for 4 weeks. ΔE was assessed by spectrophotometry (CIELab System) whereas TS was determined by a visual analog scale at baseline and weekly using four assessment points. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test and Friedman test (α = 0.05). ΔE (baseline-assessment point 4) showed no significant difference (p>0.05) across the groups: G1 (ΔE = 5.1), G2 (ΔE = 6.8), and G3 (ΔE = 4.4). Δb (baseline-assessment point 4) was significantly different (p < 0.05) in G2 (3.8) when compared to G1 (-0.2) and G3 (0.3). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in TS at baseline. Both the control and whitening dentifrices caused similar tooth color changes (ΔE). There was no significant TS during the study period.

摘要

本临床研究的目的是评估与美白牙膏相关的牙齿颜色变化(ΔE)和牙齿敏感度(TS)。根据纳入和排除标准选择了60名参与者,然后将其分为三组(n = 20):高露洁亮白(G1组)、佳洁士炫白(G2组)和索里索牙膏(G3组 - 对照组)。参与者被要求在标准化口腔卫生程序中仅使用提供的牙膏和牙刷,为期4周。通过分光光度法(CIELab系统)评估ΔE,而TS则通过视觉模拟量表在基线时以及每周使用四个评估点进行测定。数据通过双向方差分析、Tukey事后检验和Friedman检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。ΔE(基线 - 评估点4)在各组之间无显著差异(p>0.05):G1组(ΔE = 5.1)、G2组(ΔE = 6.8)和G3组(ΔE = 4.4)。与G1组(-0.2)和G3组(0.3)相比,G2组(3.8)的Δb(基线 - 评估点4)有显著差异(p < 0.05)。基线时TS无显著差异(p > 0.05)。对照牙膏和美白牙膏导致的牙齿颜色变化(ΔE)相似。研究期间牙齿敏感度无显著变化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验