Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100 Sıhhıye, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Statistics, Hacettepe University, 06800, Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5977-5985. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03903-x. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
Charcoal based oral care products have gained popularity in the last few years. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of different charcoal based whitening toothpastes on color, surface roughness and microhardness of human enamel.
Forty-eight specimens obtained from human permanent upper incisor teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups(n=12):Group-1:Colgate Total 12(CT); Group-2:Body Kingdom(BK); Group-3:Black is White(BW), Group-4:Colgate optic white(COW). Following 4 days cycle of darkening(2-min chlorhexidine and 60-min black tea per day), a 12- week brushing(twice daily for 1 min)was performed. Color of specimens was measured using a spectrophotometer. A contact type profilometer was used to measure surface roughness (Ra) and Vicker's hardness tester was used for the changes in microhardness(VHN). A representative sample from each group was visualized by SEM. Data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA, Welch, Fisher's, Kruskall-Wallis, Wilcoxon Sign Rank and Paired t-tests(p<0.05).
After 12- week brushing, no differences were found among the groups in terms of color change(p=0.989). All toothpastes tested showed no clinically acceptable whitening performances. A substantial increase in surface roughness was found in all groups, except BW(p<0.05). An increase was found in microhardness with CT(p=0.013), while no changes were found with BK, BW and COW(p>0.05).Only few scratches were observed on the enamel surfaces by SEM evaluations.
Twelve week brushing with charcoal based whitening toothpastes and a regular fluoridated toothpaste presented similar effects in color of enamel. Surface roughness was increased(except BW) while microhardness was not affected(except CT) with charcoal based whitening toothpastes.
Charcoal based whitening toothpastes do not promise to whiten the human permanent teeth and their effects on enamel abrasion should not be disregarded.
近年来,基于活性炭的口腔护理产品越来越受欢迎。本体外研究旨在比较不同的基于活性炭的美白牙膏对人牙釉质颜色、表面粗糙度和显微硬度的影响。
从 48 名人类上颌恒前牙获得 48 个样本,随机分为 4 组(n=12):组 1:高露洁全效 12(CT);组 2:身体王国(BK);组 3:黑即白(BW);组 4:高露洁皓清(COW)。在为期 4 天的黑化周期(每天 2 分钟洗必泰,60 分钟红茶)后,进行 12 周的刷牙(每天两次,每次 1 分钟)。使用分光光度计测量标本的颜色。使用接触式轮廓仪测量表面粗糙度(Ra),使用维氏硬度计测量显微硬度的变化(VHN)。每组取代表性样本进行 SEM 观察。使用单因素方差分析、Welch、Fisher、Kruskal-Wallis、Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验和配对 t 检验进行数据分析(p<0.05)。
12 周刷牙后,各组之间颜色变化无差异(p=0.989)。所有测试的牙膏均未表现出临床可接受的美白效果。除 BW 外,所有组的表面粗糙度均显著增加(p<0.05)。CT 组显微硬度增加(p=0.013),BK、BW 和 COW 组无变化(p>0.05)。SEM 评价仅观察到牙釉质表面有少许划痕。
使用基于活性炭的美白牙膏和含氟常规牙膏刷牙 12 周,对牙釉质颜色的影响相似。除 BW 外,所有基于活性炭的美白牙膏均增加了表面粗糙度(除 BW 外),而对显微硬度无影响(除 CT 外)。
基于活性炭的美白牙膏并不能承诺美白人类恒牙,不应忽视其对牙釉质磨损的影响。