Bava Ejas P, Ramachandran Rashmi, Rewari Vimi, Bansal Virinder Kumar, Trikha Anjan
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):561-567. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186620.
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been used to provide intra- and post-operative analgesia with single incision laparoscopic (SIL) bariatric and gynecological surgery with mixed results. Its efficacy in providing analgesia for SIL cholecystectomy (SILC) via the same approach remains unexplored.
The primary objective of our study was to compare the efficacy of bilateral TAP block with local anesthetic infiltration for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing SILC.
This was a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial performed in a tertiary care hospital.
Forty-two patients undergoing SILC were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided (USG) bilateral mid-axillary TAP blocks with 0.375% ropivacaine or local anesthetic infiltration of the port site. The primary outcome measure was the requirement of morphine in the first 24 h postoperatively.
The data were analyzed using -test, Mann-Whitney test or Chi-square test.
The 24 h morphine requirement (mean ± standard deviation) was 34.57 ± 14.64 mg in TAP group and 32.76 ± 14.34 mg in local infiltration group ( = 0.688). The number of patients requiring intraoperative supplemental fentanyl in TAP group was 8 and in local infiltration group was 16 ( = 0.028). The visual analog scale scores at rest and on coughing were significantly higher in the local infiltration group in the immediate postoperative period ( = 0.034 and = 0.007, respectively).
USG bilateral TAP blocks were not effective in decreasing 24 h morphine requirement as compared to local anesthetic infiltration in patients undergoing SILC although it provided some analgesic benefit intraoperatively and in the initial 4 h postoperatively. Hence, the benefits of TAP blocks are not worth the effort and time spent for administering them for this surgery.
腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞已用于单切口腹腔镜减肥手术和妇科手术的术中和术后镇痛,但效果不一。通过相同方法为单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)提供镇痛的效果仍未得到探索。
本研究的主要目的是比较双侧TAP阻滞与局部麻醉药浸润用于SILC患者围手术期镇痛的效果。
这是一项在三级护理医院进行的前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验。
42例行SILC的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受超声引导(USG)下双侧腋中线TAP阻滞(使用0.375%罗哌卡因)或端口部位局部麻醉药浸润。主要结局指标是术后24小时内吗啡的需求量。
数据采用t检验、曼-惠特尼检验或卡方检验进行分析。
TAP阻滞组术后24小时吗啡需求量(均值±标准差)为34.57±14.64mg,局部浸润组为32.76±14.34mg(P=0.688)。TAP阻滞组术中需要补充芬太尼的患者有8例,局部浸润组有16例(P=0.028)。术后即刻,局部浸润组静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分显著更高(分别为P=0.034和P=0.007)。
对于接受SILC的患者,与局部麻醉药浸润相比,USG双侧TAP阻滞在降低术后24小时吗啡需求量方面无效,尽管它在术中及术后最初4小时提供了一定的镇痛益处。因此,TAP阻滞的益处不值得为该手术实施它所花费的精力和时间。