Yıldırım Ar Arzu, Erdoğan Arı Dilek, Yiğit Kuplay Yıldız, İşcan Yalın, Karadoğan Firdevs, Kırım Damla, Akgün Fatma Nur
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Istambul, Turquia.
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Educational and Research Hospital, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Istambul, Turquia.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Sep-Oct;68(5):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
The use of transversus abdominis plane block with different local anesthetics is considered as a part of multimodal analgesia regimen in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. However no studies have been published comparing bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for transversus abdominis plane block. We aimed to compare bupivacaine and levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Fifty patients (ASA I/II), undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups. Following anesthesia induction, ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block was performed with 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% in Group B ( = 25) and 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.25% in Group L ( = 25) for each side. The level of pain was evaluated using 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing 1, 5, 15, 30 min and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after the operation. When visual analogue scale > 3, the patients received IV tenoxicam 20 mg. If visual analogue scale remained >3, they received IV. tramadol 1 mg.kg. In case of inadequate analgesia, a rescue analgesic was given. The analgesic requirement, time to first analgesic requirement was recorded.
Visual analogue scale levels showed no difference except first and fifth minutes postoperatively where VAS was higher in Group L ( < 0.05). Analgesic requirement was similar in both groups. Time to first analgesic requirement was shorter in Group L (4.35 ± 6.92 min vs. 34.91 ± 86.26 min, = 0.013).
Bupivacaine and levobupivacaine showed similar efficacy at TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中,使用不同局部麻醉药进行腹横肌平面阻滞被视为多模式镇痛方案的一部分。然而,尚未有比较布比卡因和左旋布比卡因用于腹横肌平面阻滞的研究发表。我们旨在比较布比卡因和左旋布比卡因在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞中的效果。
50例(ASA I/II级)接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为两组。麻醉诱导后,B组(n = 25)每侧使用30 mL 0.25%布比卡因、L组(n = 25)每侧使用30 mL 0.25%左旋布比卡因进行超声引导下双侧腹横肌平面阻滞。术后1、5、15、30分钟以及1、2、4、6、12和24小时,使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估静息和咳嗽时的疼痛程度。当视觉模拟量表>3时,患者静脉注射20 mg替诺昔康。如果视觉模拟量表仍>3,则静脉注射1 mg/kg曲马多。若镇痛不足,则给予补救镇痛药。记录镇痛需求、首次需要镇痛药的时间。
视觉模拟量表水平在术后第一分钟和第五分钟除外无差异,L组在这两个时间点的VAS较高(P<0.05)。两组的镇痛需求相似。L组首次需要镇痛药的时间较短(4.35±6.92分钟对34.91±86.26分钟,P = 0.013)。
在接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中,布比卡因和左旋布比卡因在腹横肌平面阻滞中显示出相似的疗效。