• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于种植体特征对大直径种植体存活率影响的荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant.

作者信息

Ting Miriam, Palermo Matthew, Donatelli David P, Gaughan John P, Suzuki Jon B, Jefferies Steven R

机构信息

Kornberg School of Dentistry, Temple University, 3223 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.

School of Medicine, Temple University, 3420 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.

出版信息

Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2. Epub 2015 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2
PMID:27747650
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5005654/
Abstract

The purposes of the study are to study the implant survival of the wide-diameter implant and to analyze if the length, the implant surface, or the placement location has any effect on its survival. Electronic databases were searched from inception to Dec 2014. Studies included in the review had implants placed in areas of adequate bone width and had clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection. Immediately placed and immediately loaded implants were excluded. A meta-analysis was done using the "random effects" model on the included studies. And, a meta-regression was used to evaluate the effects of location, length, and surface on the implant survival. Of the six studies selected, three evaluated surface-treated implants and three machined implants. The overall pooled survival rate of the wide implant is 96.3 %. The meta-regression showed that when using a wide implant, neither its surface nor its length nor its position in the maxilla or mandible adversely affected its survival (P > 0.05). This meta-analysis concluded that the location, length, and surface of the wide-diameter implant did not affect its survival and therefore suggested that when the conditions of the implant site corresponded to the inclusion criteria of our meta-analysis, choosing a wide-diameter implant in the posterior mandible or maxilla, where implant length may be limited by the nerve or the sinus, the use of a short implant regardless of its surface would not affect its survival.

摘要

本研究的目的是研究大直径种植体的种植体存留情况,并分析长度、种植体表面或植入位置对其存留是否有任何影响。从数据库建立至2014年12月进行电子数据库检索。纳入本综述的研究中,种植体植入骨宽度充足的区域,且对患者选择有明确的纳入和排除标准。即刻植入和即刻加载的种植体被排除。对纳入研究使用“随机效应”模型进行荟萃分析。并且,使用荟萃回归来评估位置、长度和表面对种植体存留的影响。在所选的六项研究中,三项评估了表面处理种植体,三项评估了机械加工种植体。宽种植体的总体合并存留率为96.3%。荟萃回归显示,使用宽种植体时,其表面、长度以及在上颌或下颌中的位置均未对其存留产生不利影响(P>0.05)。本荟萃分析得出结论,大直径种植体的位置、长度和表面不影响其存留,因此表明,当种植部位的条件符合我们荟萃分析的纳入标准时,在下颌或上颌后部选择大直径种植体,此处种植体长度可能受神经或窦的限制,无论其表面如何,使用短种植体均不会影响其存留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/c2daae4d9107/40729_2015_30_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/c0c83dcee39b/40729_2015_30_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/183476924460/40729_2015_30_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/c2daae4d9107/40729_2015_30_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/c0c83dcee39b/40729_2015_30_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/183476924460/40729_2015_30_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4e7/5005654/c2daae4d9107/40729_2015_30_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant.关于种植体特征对大直径种植体存活率影响的荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2015 Dec;1(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40729-015-0030-2. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
2
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
3
Survival of short implants is improved with greater implant length, placement in the mandible compared with the maxilla, and in nonsmokers.短种植体的存活率随着种植体长度的增加、在下颌骨中的植入位置(相对于上颌骨)以及非吸烟者而提高。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012 Sep;12(3 Suppl):189-91. doi: 10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70035-0.
4
Impact of Implant Length on Survival of Rough-Surface Implants in Nonaugmented Posterior Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.非增强后牙区粗糙表面种植体的种植体长度对其存活率的影响:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1359-1369. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7509.
5
A Systematic Review of Outcomes Following Immediate Molar Implant Placement Based on Recently Published Studies.基于近期发表研究的即刻磨牙种植术后效果的系统评价
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1084-1094. doi: 10.1111/cid.12390. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
6
Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.种植体长度和直径对生存率的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:35-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01349.x.
7
Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.种植体直径对上颌后牙区种植体长期存留率的影响:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1333-z. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
8
Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.愈合期间延迟加载和即刻加载种植体的种植体稳定性测量
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Oct;15(5):529-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01042.x.
9
15-year follow-up of short dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: Mandible Vs maxilla.部分牙列缺失患者植入短种植体的15年随访:下颌骨与上颌骨对比
Ann Anat. 2019 Mar;222:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Retrospective clinical study of 988 dual acid-etched implants placed in grafted and native bone for single-tooth replacement.回顾性临床研究:988 颗双重酸蚀种植体在移植骨和自体骨中用于单牙种植修复。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Sep-Oct;27(5):1243-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of ultra-wide implants in the mandibular and maxillary posterior areas: a 5-year retrospective clinical study.超宽种植体在下颌和上颌后部区域的有效性:一项5年回顾性临床研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023 Feb 28;49(1):13-20. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.1.13.
2
A Six-Year Prospective Comparative Study of Wide and Standard Diameter Implants in the Maxillary and Mandibular Posterior Area.上颌和下颌后区宽直径和标准直径种植体的六年前瞻性对比研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 25;57(10):1009. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101009.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Dental Implant Failure among Healthy and Well-Controlled Diabetic Patients-A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.种植体直径对上颌后牙区种植体长期存留率的影响:一项系统评价
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1333-z. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
2
Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure.种植体直径和长度对早期牙种植失败的影响。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Feb;68(2):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.002.
3
Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.
健康且血糖控制良好的糖尿病患者中牙种植体失败的比较评估——一项为期 3 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5253. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145253.
用于修复无牙后牙区的种植体(直径 3.3 毫米):一项长达 11 年随访的回顾性临床研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Jun;13(2):95-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00188.x.
4
Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.使用宽体种植体支持的单单位修复体替代下颌磨牙:即刻负重与延期负重。一项随机对照研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 May-Jun;23(3):474-80.
5
Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.体内的车削加工与双重蚀刻牙科植入物
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007 Jun;9(2):71-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00030.x.
6
Wide-diameter implants: analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures.
J Periodontol. 2007 Jan;78(1):52-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060139.
7
Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review.种植体尺寸和形状对种植成功率的影响:文献综述
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Oct;94(4):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.018.
8
A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients.对部分牙列缺损患者植入短(≤7毫米)骨内牙种植体的研究结果进行的针对性综述。
J Periodontol. 2004 Jun;75(6):798-804. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.6.798.
9
Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months.对短的、机加工表面种植体进行12至92个月的临床评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Nov-Dec;18(6):894-901.
10
Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.部分后牙缺失的牙列缺损患者的种植义齿修复治疗:多伦多经验
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):352-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.91.