• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The relationship between age and driving attitudes and behaviors among older Americans.美国老年人的年龄与驾驶态度及行为之间的关系。
Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0043-6. Epub 2015 May 21.
2
Age-related differences in fatal intersection crashes in the United States.美国致命交叉路口撞车事故中的年龄差异。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):20-29. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.030. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
3
Survey about pedestrian safety and attitudes toward automated traffic enforcement in Washington, D.C.华盛顿特区行人安全与对自动化交通执法态度调查
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(4):414-23. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.830212.
4
Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?道路交通事故与葡萄牙汽车驾驶员自我报告的态度、行为和观点:它们之间有关联吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Oct 2;17(7):705-11. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1150591. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
5
Student drivers: a study of fatal motor vehicle crashes involving 16-year-old drivers.学生驾驶员:一项关于涉及16岁驾驶员的致命机动车撞车事故的研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.08.039.
6
Characteristics of Single Vehicle Crashes with a Teen Driver in South Carolina, 2005-2008.2005-2008 年南卡罗来纳州青少年驾驶员单车事故特征分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:325-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
7
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.对老年驾驶员进行视力筛查以预防道路交通伤害和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16(3):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub3.
8
Using naturalistic driving data to better understand the driving exposure and patterns of older drivers.利用自然驾驶数据更好地了解老年驾驶员的驾驶暴露情况和模式。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S83-S88. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1379601.
9
Experimental intercomparisons of younger and older driver perceptions.
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1992;36(3):239-53. doi: 10.2190/tag8-9wa4-yx0m-9t17.
10
Vision screening of older drivers for preventing road traffic injuries and fatalities.对老年驾驶员进行视力筛查以预防道路交通伤害和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21(1):CD006252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006252.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related differences in driving behaviors among non-professional drivers in Egypt.埃及非职业驾驶员驾驶行为的年龄相关差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238516. eCollection 2020.
2
The Effects of Age, Distraction, and Simulated Central Vision Impairment on Hazard Detection in a Driving Simulator.年龄、分心和模拟中心视力障碍对驾驶模拟器中危险检测的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2020 Apr;97(4):239-248. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001501.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender and racial disparities in driving cessation among older adults.老年人中因性别和种族差异而导致的驾驶行为停止现象。
J Aging Health. 2013 Dec;25(8 Suppl):147S-62S. doi: 10.1177/0898264313519886.
2
Gauging popular support for traffic safety in the United States.评估美国交通安全的民众支持度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:1112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
3
The on-road difficulties of older drivers and their relationship with self-reported motor vehicle crashes.老年驾驶员的道路困难及其与自我报告机动车事故的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2062-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02498.x. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
4
Seat belt use among rear passengers: validity of self-reported versus observational measures.后排乘客安全带使用情况:自我报告与观察性测量方法的有效性
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 9;8:233. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-233.
5
Do older drivers pose a risk to other road users?年长的司机会对其他道路使用者构成风险吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2008;9(3):181-9. doi: 10.1080/15389580801975632.
6
Fragility versus excessive crash involvement as determinants of high death rates per vehicle-mile of travel among older drivers.在老年驾驶员中,车辆每行驶一英里的高死亡率的决定因素是脆弱性与过度碰撞事故参与度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Mar;35(2):227-35. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00107-5.
7
Validity of self reported data on injury prevention behavior: lessons from observational and self reported surveys of safety belt use in the US.自我报告的伤害预防行为数据的有效性:来自美国安全带使用情况观察性调查和自我报告调查的经验教训。
Inj Prev. 1996 Mar;2(1):67-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.2.1.67.

美国老年人的年龄与驾驶态度及行为之间的关系。

The relationship between age and driving attitudes and behaviors among older Americans.

作者信息

Mizenko Alexander J, Tefft Brian C, Arnold Lindsay S, Grabowski Jurek G

机构信息

AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 607 14th Street, NW, Suite 201, 20005, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Inj Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;2(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40621-015-0043-6. Epub 2015 May 21.

DOI:10.1186/s40621-015-0043-6
PMID:27747741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5005785/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to a decreasing birth rate and longer life expectancy, the proportion of Americans over the age of 65 is expected to rise in coming years. Drivers over 65 drive two billion miles yearly, a number that will increase. For that reason, it is imperative to understand their attitudes and perceptions. It is also important to understand whether drivers over 65 can be treated as one cohesive group, or if there are differences among them.

METHODS

A web-enabled survey was conducted among Americans in the years 2011-2013. Responses from 1793 persons over 65 regarding attitudes towards driving behaviors, support for safety interventions, and engagement in unsafe behaviors were analyzed. Respondents were stratified by age: 65-69, 70-74, and 75 and older. Age groups were compared using logistic regression. Other potential explanatory factors were analyzed and controlled for.

RESULTS

The three groups were similar on many outcomes. However, statistically significant differences were found between them with regard to perceptions on speeding and the support for speed cameras, among other outcomes. In nearly all cases, those 75 and older were the most "pro-safety." However, when adjusted for demographic characteristics other than age, a larger proportion of respondents 75 and older reported engaging in red light running and drowsy driving in the last 30 days, and the difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Older drivers are strongly "pro-traffic safety." However, the finding that those 65-69 are less so is concerning. This is especially true if it is the result of a cohort effect instead of an age effect. The increase in certain behaviors among those 75 and older is also concerning; drivers over this age are more prone to fatal injury when involved in a motor vehicle crashes. This poses a public health issue as the 75and older population expands.

摘要

背景

由于出生率下降和预期寿命延长,预计未来几年65岁以上的美国人比例将会上升。65岁以上的驾驶者每年行驶20亿英里,这一数字还会增加。因此,了解他们的态度和看法至关重要。了解65岁以上的驾驶者是否可以被视为一个统一的群体,或者他们之间是否存在差异也很重要。

方法

2011年至2013年期间对美国人进行了一项网络调查。分析了1793名65岁以上人员对驾驶行为的态度、对安全干预措施的支持以及不安全行为参与情况的回复。受访者按年龄分层:65 - 69岁、70 - 74岁以及75岁及以上。使用逻辑回归对年龄组进行比较。分析并控制了其他潜在的解释因素。

结果

三组在许多结果上相似。然而,在超速认知和对测速摄像头的支持等结果方面,他们之间存在统计学上的显著差异。几乎在所有情况下,75岁及以上的人最“支持安全”。然而,在调整了年龄以外的人口特征后,75岁及以上的受访者中有更大比例报告在过去30天内有闯红灯和疲劳驾驶行为,且差异具有统计学意义。

结论

老年驾驶者强烈“支持交通安全”。然而,65 - 69岁的人支持度较低这一发现令人担忧。如果这是队列效应而非年龄效应的结果,情况尤其如此。75岁及以上人群中某些行为的增加也令人担忧;这个年龄段的驾驶者在机动车碰撞事故中更容易受到致命伤害。随着75岁及以上人口的增加,这构成了一个公共卫生问题。