• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学诚信资源指南:美国联邦机构、基金会、非营利组织、专业协会和学术界所做的努力。

Scientific integrity resource guide: Efforts by federal agencies, foundations, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, and academia in the United States.

作者信息

Kretser Alison, Murphy Delia, Dwyer Johanna

机构信息

a ILSI North America , Washington , DC , USA.

b School of Medicine and Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Frances Stern Nutrition Center, Tufts Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , USA.

出版信息

Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jan 2;57(1):163-180. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1221794.

DOI:10.1080/10408398.2016.1221794
PMID:27748637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5152548/
Abstract

Scientific integrity is at the forefront of the scientific research enterprise. This paper provides an overview of key existing efforts on scientific integrity by federal agencies, foundations, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, and academia from 1989 to April 2016. It serves as a resource for the scientific community on scientific integrity work and helps to identify areas in which more action is needed. Overall, there is tremendous activity in this area and there are clear linkages among the efforts of the five sectors. All the same, scientific integrity needs to remain visible in the scientific community and evolve along with new research paradigms. High priority in instilling these values falls upon all stakeholders.

摘要

科学诚信处于科学研究事业的前沿。本文概述了1989年至2016年4月期间联邦机构、基金会、非营利组织、专业协会和学术界在科学诚信方面现有的主要工作。它为科学界提供了有关科学诚信工作的资源,并有助于确定需要采取更多行动的领域。总体而言,该领域活动频繁,五个部门的工作之间存在明显联系。尽管如此,科学诚信仍需在科学界保持显著地位,并随着新的研究范式不断发展。向所有利益相关者灌输这些价值观是当务之急。

相似文献

1
Scientific integrity resource guide: Efforts by federal agencies, foundations, nonprofit organizations, professional societies, and academia in the United States.科学诚信资源指南:美国联邦机构、基金会、非营利组织、专业协会和学术界所做的努力。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Jan 2;57(1):163-180. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1221794.
2
Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.科研不端行为:一种“白衣犯罪”形式。
J Pharm Law. 1993;2(1):15-34.
3
Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.防范欺诈与欺骗:科学探究中不当行为的法律层面
J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):59-71.
4
Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.科学不端行为与研究诚信:联邦定义及方法
Prof Ethics. 1999 Spring;7(1):9-32. doi: 10.5840/profethics1999711.
5
Graduate teaching in principles of scientific integrity.科学诚信原则的研究生教学。
Acad Med. 1993 Dec;68(12):879-86. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199312000-00003.
6
Prevention over cure: the administrative rationale for education in the responsible conduct of research.预防胜于治疗:负责任研究行为教育的管理依据。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):835-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7e0b.
7
Should the government assure scientific integrity?政府应该确保科学诚信吗?
Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9 Suppl):S56-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199309000-00035.
8
Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.科研不当行为的定义与界限:来自联邦政府视角的观点
J Higher Educ. 1994 May-Jun;65(3):286-97.
9
A judgement fit for prime time.适合黄金时段的判决。
Nature. 1996 Jun 27;381(6585):717. doi: 10.1038/381717a0.
10
Non-starters and no brainers: an outside perspective.毫无成功机会的事和显而易见的事:一种外部视角。
Account Res. 1997;5(4):255-63. doi: 10.1080/08989629708573915.

引用本文的文献

1
Is open science a double-edged sword?: data sharing and the changing citation pattern of Chinese economics articles.开放科学是一把双刃剑吗?:数据共享与中国经济学文章引用模式的变化
Scientometrics. 2023;128(5):2803-2818. doi: 10.1007/s11192-023-04684-8. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Awareness and knowledge of manuscript writing and research integrity: A cross sectional survey among graduate students.研究生对手稿撰写和研究诚信的认识与了解:一项横断面调查
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 5;8(11):e11447. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11447. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
A systematic literature review to identify ethical, legal, and social responsibilities of nonprofit organizations when funding clinical trials in pediatric cancer.系统文献回顾,以确定非营利组织在资助儿科癌症临床试验时的伦理、法律和社会责任。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Sep;69(9):e29854. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29854. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
4
Beyond nutrition and physical activity: food industry shaping of the very principles of scientific integrity.超越营养和体育活动:食品行业对科学诚信原则的影响。
Global Health. 2021 Apr 20;17(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00689-1.
5
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.科学诚信原则与最佳实践:科学诚信联盟的建议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):327-355. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Opinion: Medical misinformation in the era of Google: Computational approaches to a pervasive problem.观点:谷歌时代的医学错误信息:针对一个普遍问题的计算方法。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):6318-6321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808264115.

本文引用的文献

1
Raising the bar for reproducible science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.提高美国环境保护局研究与发展办公室可重复科学的标准。
Toxicol Sci. 2015 May;145(1):16-22. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv020. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
2
Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.政策:NIH 计划提高可重复性。
Nature. 2014 Jan 30;505(7485):612-3. doi: 10.1038/505612a.
3
Scientific publishing. Data integrity report sends journals back to the drawing board.科学出版。数据完整性报告让期刊重新回到了绘图板前。
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):381. doi: 10.1126/science.325_381.
4
Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.公共卫生服务部关于研究不当行为的政策。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 May 17;70(94):28369-400.