Oelschläger H, Rothley D, Hellwich K H, Schmidt W
Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 1989 Jun;322(6):337-42. doi: 10.1002/ardp.19893220603.
After oral administration of Ciprofibrate (1) to volunteers (n = 5) only its glucuronide, but no 1 and no 2-(4-Hydroxyphenoxy)-2-methyl-propionic acid (3) could be detected in the fresh urine. Its formation from 1 seems to be impossible on the basis of established biochemical reactions. Therefore, its presence in the urine of volunteers reported by other authors is refuted.
在给志愿者(n = 5)口服环丙贝特(1)后,在新鲜尿液中仅检测到其葡萄糖醛酸苷,未检测到1以及2-(4-羟基苯氧基)-2-甲基丙酸(3)。基于已确定的生化反应,由1形成它似乎是不可能的。因此,其他作者报道的志愿者尿液中它的存在被驳斥。