Weaver Kimberly N, Kappelman Michael D, Sandler Robert S, Martin Christopher F, Chen Wenli, Anton Kristen, Long Millie D
*Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; †Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; ‡Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease; §Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and ‖Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Nov;22(11):2672-2677. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000933.
As variation in care has previously been linked to quality, we aimed to describe variations in inflammatory bowel diseases care by gastroenterology (GI) practice setting.
We performed a cross-sectional study within the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America Partners and used bivariate analyses to compare patient characteristics by GI practice setting (GI-academic [GIA], GI-private, or GI-other). Regression models were used to describe the effects of provider type on steroid use, disease activity, and the quality of life.
The study included 12,083 patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (7576 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 4507 with ulcerative colitis [UC]). Nearly 95% reported visiting a GI provider annually. Also, CD patients seen by GIA were younger, better educated, used less 5-aminosalicylate agents, and had higher biologic and immunomodulator use (P < 0.001 for all). On multivariate analysis of CD patients, GIA used less steroids when compared with GI-private (odds ratio, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-1.06) or GI-other (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.89). GIA patients were more likely to be in remission, have flu vaccine, and have better quality of life. UC patients seen by GIA were younger, had more hospitalizations, and previous surgery (P < 0.001 for all). No differences existed for steroid use, remission, flu vaccine, or quality of life for UC care on bivariate or multivariate analyses.
Significant variations in care patterns and quality measures exist for CD across GI provider types, without similar variation in UC care. Interventions to reduce variations in care could improve the quality of care in CD.
由于此前已发现医疗差异与医疗质量相关,我们旨在描述胃肠病学(GI)诊疗机构中炎症性肠病护理的差异情况。
我们在美国克罗恩病和结肠炎基金会合作伙伴内部开展了一项横断面研究,并采用双变量分析按GI诊疗机构类型(GI学术型[GIA]、GI私立型或GI其他型)比较患者特征。使用回归模型来描述医疗服务提供者类型对类固醇使用、疾病活动度及生活质量的影响。
该研究纳入了12,083例炎症性肠病患者(7576例克罗恩病[CD]患者和4507例溃疡性结肠炎[UC]患者)。近95%的患者报告每年就诊于GI医疗服务提供者。此外,GIA诊疗的CD患者更年轻、受教育程度更高、5-氨基水杨酸制剂使用较少,生物制剂和免疫调节剂使用更多(所有P值均<0.001)。对CD患者进行多变量分析时,与GI私立型(比值比,0.84;95%置信区间,0.67 - 1.06)或GI其他型(比值比,0.66;95%置信区间,0.49 - 0.89)相比,GIA使用的类固醇较少。GIA的患者更有可能处于缓解期、接种流感疫苗且生活质量更好。GIA诊疗的UC患者更年轻,住院次数更多且有过手术史(所有P值均<0.001)。在双变量或多变量分析中,UC护理在类固醇使用、缓解情况、流感疫苗接种或生活质量方面均无差异。
不同GI医疗服务提供者类型之间,CD的护理模式和质量指标存在显著差异,而UC护理则无类似差异。减少护理差异的干预措施可能会提高CD的护理质量。