Bonef Bastien, Lopez-Haro Miguel, Amichi Lynda, Beeler Mark, Grenier Adeline, Robin Eric, Jouneau Pierre-Henri, Mollard Nicolas, Mouton Isabelle, Monroy Eva, Bougerol Catherine
Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
INAC, CEA-Grenoble, 17 av. des Martyrs, F-38000, Grenoble, France.
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2016 Dec;11(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s11671-016-1668-2. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
The enhancement of the performance of advanced nitride-based optoelectronic devices requires the fine tuning of their composition, which has to be determined with a high accuracy and at the nanometer scale. For that purpose, we have evaluated and compared energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) in terms of composition analysis of AlGaN/GaN multilayers. Both techniques give comparable results with a composition accuracy better than 0.6 % even for layers as thin as 3 nm. In case of EDX, we show the relevance of correcting the X-ray absorption by simultaneous determination of the mass thickness and chemical composition at each point of the analysis. Limitations of both techniques are discussed when applied to specimens with different geometries or compositions.
先进氮化物基光电器件性能的提升需要对其成分进行精细调整,而这必须在纳米尺度上以高精度确定。为此,我们在扫描透射电子显微镜(STEM)中评估并比较了能量色散X射线光谱(EDX)和用于AlGaN/GaN多层膜成分分析的原子探针断层扫描(APT)。即使对于仅3纳米厚的层,这两种技术都能给出成分精度优于0.6%的可比结果。对于EDX,我们展示了通过在分析的每个点同时测定质量厚度和化学成分来校正X射线吸收的相关性。当应用于具有不同几何形状或成分的样品时,讨论了这两种技术的局限性。