Yazdani Abyaneh Mohammad-Ali, Engel Peter, Slominski Andrzej, Ragsdale Bruce, Agag Richard, Cramer Daniel, Carlson J Andrew
*Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; †Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; ‡VA Boston Healthcare System Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Boston, MA; §Department of Dermatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL; ¶Western Pathology, Inc., San Luis Obispo, CA; ‖Department of Plastic Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY; **Loyola Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL; and ††Department of Pathology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY.
Am J Dermatopathol. 2017 Mar;39(3):189-194. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000640.
Giant basal cell carcinomas (GBCCs), (BCC ≥ 5 cm), are often painless, destructive tumors resulting from poorly understood patient neglect.
To elucidate etiopathogenic factors distinguishing GBCC from basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and identify predictors for disease-specific death (DSD).
Case-control study examining clinicopathologic and neuroactive factors (β-endorphin, met-enkephalin, serotonin, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and neurofilament expression) in GBCC and BCC. Systematic literature review to determine DSD predictors.
Thirteen GBCCs (11 patients) were compared with 26 BCCs (25 patients). GBCC significantly differed in size, disease duration, and outcomes; patients were significantly more likely to live alone, lack concern, and have alcoholism. GBCC significantly exhibited infiltrative/morpheic phenotypes, perineural invasion, ulceration, and faster growth. All neuromediators were similarly expressed. Adenoid phenotype was significantly more common in GBCC. Adenoid tumors expressed significantly more β-endorphin (60% vs. 18%, P = 0.01) and serotonin (30% vs. 4%, P = 0.02). In meta-analysis (n ≤ 311: median age 68 years, disease duration 90 months, tumor diameter 8 cm, 18.4% disease-specific mortality), independent DSD predictors included tumor diameter (cm) (hazard ratio (HR): 1.12, P = 0.003), bone invasion (HR: 4.19, P = 0.015), brain invasion (HR: 8.23, P = 0.001), and distant metastases (HR: 14.48, P = 0.000).
GBCC etiopathogenesis is multifactorial (ie, tumor biology, psychosocial factors). BCC production of paracrine neuromediators deserves further study.
巨大基底细胞癌(GBCC,基底细胞癌直径≥5 cm)通常为无痛性、具有破坏性的肿瘤,其病因是患者忽视,对此了解不足。
阐明区分GBCC与基底细胞癌(BCC)的病因学因素,并确定疾病特异性死亡(DSD)的预测因素。
进行病例对照研究,检测GBCC和BCC的临床病理及神经活性因素(β-内啡肽、甲硫氨酸脑啡肽、血清素、促肾上腺皮质激素和神经丝蛋白表达)。进行系统文献综述以确定DSD的预测因素。
将13例GBCC(11例患者)与26例BCC(25例患者)进行比较。GBCC在大小、疾病持续时间和结局方面有显著差异;患者独居、缺乏关注和酗酒的可能性显著更高。GBCC显著表现为浸润性/硬斑病样表型、神经周围侵犯、溃疡形成和生长更快。所有神经介质的表达相似。腺样表型在GBCC中显著更常见。腺样肿瘤中β-内啡肽(60%对18%,P = 0.01)和血清素(30%对4%,P = 0.02)的表达显著更高。在荟萃分析中(n≤311:中位年龄68岁,疾病持续时间90个月,肿瘤直径8 cm,疾病特异性死亡率18.4%),独立的DSD预测因素包括肿瘤直径(cm)(风险比(HR):1.12,P = 0.003)、骨侵犯(HR:4.19,P = 0.015)、脑侵犯(HR:8.23,P = 0.001)和远处转移(HR:14.48,P = 0.000)。
GBCC的病因学是多因素的(即肿瘤生物学、社会心理因素)。BCC旁分泌神经介质的产生值得进一步研究。