Casey J, Jardim E, Martinsohn J Th
European Commission, Directorate-General Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate D-Sustainable Resources, Unit D.02-Water and Marine Resources, TP051-Bldg. 5a, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, 21027, Ispra, VA, Italy.
J Fish Biol. 2016 Dec;89(6):2755-2767. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13151. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
Exploitation of fish and shellfish stocks by the European Union fishing fleet is managed under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), which aims to ensure that fishing and aquaculture are environmentally, economically and socially sustainable and that they provide a source of healthy food for E.U. citizens. A notable feature of the CFP is its legally enshrined requirement for sound scientific advice to underpin its objectives. The CFP was first conceived in 1970 when it formed part of the Common Agricultural Policy. Its formal inception as a stand-alone regulation occurred in 1983 and since that time, the CFP has undergone reforms in 1992, 2002 and 2013, each time bringing additional challenges to the scientific advisory process as the scope of the advice increased in response to changing objectives arising from E.U. regulations and commitments to international agreements. This paper reviews the influence that genetics has had on fish stock assessments and the provision of management advice for European fisheries under successive reforms of the CFP. The developments in genetics since the inception of the CFP have given rise to a diverse and versatile set of genetic techniques that have the potential to provide significant added value to fisheries assessments and the scientific advisory process. While in some cases, notably Pacific salmon Oncorhynchus spp., genetics appear to be very well integrated into existing management schemes, it seems that for marine fishes, discussions on the use of genetics and genomics for fisheries management are often driven by the remarkable technological progress in this field, rather than imminent needs emerging from policy frameworks. An example is the recent suggestion to use environmental (e)DNA for monitoring purposes. While there is no denying that state-of-the-art genetic and genomic approaches can and will be of value to address a number of issues relevant for the management and conservation of marine renewable natural resources, a focus on technology rather than policy and management needs is prone to widen the gap between science and policy, governance and management, thereby further impeding the effective integration of genetic and genomic information into the fisheries management decision making process. Hence, rather than focusing on what is technically achievable, this review outlines suggestions as to which modern genetic and genomic approaches are likely to help address some of the most pressing fisheries management challenges under the CFP.
欧盟捕鱼船队对鱼类和贝类种群的开发是根据共同渔业政策(CFP)进行管理的,该政策旨在确保捕捞和水产养殖在环境、经济和社会方面具有可持续性,并为欧盟公民提供健康的食物来源。共同渔业政策的一个显著特点是其在法律上规定需要有可靠的科学建议来支持其目标。共同渔业政策最初于1970年构想,当时它是共同农业政策的一部分。1983年它正式作为一项独立法规出台,自那时以来,共同渔业政策在1992年、2002年和2013年进行了改革,随着因欧盟法规和国际协议承诺而产生的目标变化,建议的范围不断扩大,每次改革都给科学咨询过程带来了更多挑战。本文回顾了在共同渔业政策的 successive reforms下,遗传学对鱼类种群评估以及为欧洲渔业提供管理建议所产生的影响。自共同渔业政策出台以来,遗传学的发展催生了一系列多样且通用的遗传技术,这些技术有可能为渔业评估和科学咨询过程带来显著的附加价值。虽然在某些情况下,特别是太平洋鲑鱼(Oncorhynchus spp.),遗传学似乎已很好地融入现有管理方案,但对于海洋鱼类而言,关于将遗传学和基因组学用于渔业管理的讨论往往是由该领域显著的技术进步推动的,而非政策框架中迫在眉睫的需求。一个例子是最近关于使用环境(e)DNA进行监测的建议。虽然不可否认,先进的遗传和基因组方法能够且将会对解决与海洋可再生自然资源管理和保护相关的一些问题具有价值,但专注于技术而非政策和管理需求容易扩大科学与政策、治理与管理之间的差距,从而进一步阻碍遗传和基因组信息有效融入渔业管理决策过程。因此,本综述并非专注于技术上可实现的内容,而是概述了哪些现代遗传和基因组方法可能有助于应对共同渔业政策下一些最紧迫的渔业管理挑战的建议。