Lanas Fernando, Serón Pamela, Muñoz Sergio, Margozzini Paula, Puig Teresa
Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Frontera, M. Montt 112, Temuco, Chile; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de La Frontera, M. Montt 112, Temuco, Chile.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;86:111-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.018. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Obesity is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk. However, the optimal measure and cutoffs in Latin America are not defined. We sought to assess the relationship between body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) with risk factor prevalence and estimated coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and to assess if recommended cutoffs apply to the Chilean population.
Data from 2,200 men and 3,216 women from the Chilean Health Survey 2009-2010 were analyzed. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare discrimination and estimate optimal cutoffs. Sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement (NRI) for these cutoffs were compared with values obtained applying international recommendations.
WHtR and WC have a higher ROC area for risk factors and CHD risk. BMI and WC optimal cutoffs did not improve net reclassification when compared with international recommendations. A WHtR of 0.55 in men improves NRI compared with proposed values (P < 0.01). A WHtR of 0.6 in women improves NRI when compared with BMI (P > 0.01) but not when compared with WC.
Central obesity measurements demonstrated the strongest associations with CV risk factors and estimated risk. Optimal cutoffs were similar to those recommended internationally with the exception of WHtR.
肥胖是心血管疾病风险的重要决定因素。然而,拉丁美洲的最佳测量方法和临界值尚未确定。我们试图评估体重指数(BMI)、腰围(WC)和腰高比(WHtR)与危险因素患病率及估计的冠心病(CHD)风险之间的关系,并评估推荐的临界值是否适用于智利人群。
分析了来自2009 - 2010年智利健康调查的2200名男性和3216名女性的数据。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线比较辨别力并估计最佳临界值。将这些临界值的敏感性、特异性和净重新分类改善(NRI)与应用国际推荐值获得的值进行比较。
WHtR和WC在危险因素和CHD风险方面具有更高的ROC面积。与国际推荐值相比,BMI和WC的最佳临界值并未改善净重新分类。男性WHtR为0.55时,与提议值相比NRI有所改善(P < 0.01)。女性WHtR为0.6时,与BMI相比NRI有所改善(P > 0.01),但与WC相比则没有。
中心性肥胖测量结果显示与心血管危险因素和估计风险的关联最强。除WHtR外,最佳临界值与国际推荐值相似。