• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method.通过肱动脉袖带阻断技术无创评估心输出量:与开路乙炔冲洗法的比较。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Dec 1;121(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
2
Cardiac output during exercise by the open circuit acetylene washin method: comparison with direct Fick.采用开路乙炔冲洗法测定运动时的心输出量:与直接Fick法的比较
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 May;88(5):1650-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1650.
3
Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Output: Accuracy and Precision of the Closed-Circuit Acetylene Rebreathing Technique for Cardiac Output Measurement.无创心输出量评估:乙炔再呼吸技术测量心输出量的准确性和精密度。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e015794. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.015794. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output at rest and during exercise by finger plethysmography.通过手指体积描记法对静息和运动时的心输出量进行无创评估。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Sep;33(5):338-43. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12032. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Use of acetylene breathing to determine cardiac output in young and older adults.使用乙炔呼吸法测定年轻人和老年人的心输出量。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jan;35(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200301000-00010.
6
Feasibility of Brachial Occlusion Technique for Beat-to-Beat Pulse Wave Analysis.桡动脉阻断技术用于实时脉搏波分析的可行性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;22(19):7285. doi: 10.3390/s22197285.
7
Comparison and reliability of two non-invasive acetylene uptake techniques for the measurement of cardiac output.两种用于测量心输出量的非侵入性乙炔摄取技术的比较及可靠性
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Aug;94(5-6):670-80. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1343-2. Epub 2005 May 26.
8
Validation of stroke volume and cardiac output by electrical interrogation of the brachial artery in normals: assessment of strengths, limitations, and sources of error.通过对正常人群肱动脉进行电刺激来验证每搏输出量和心输出量:对优势、局限性及误差来源的评估。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Dec;29(6):789-800. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9668-9. Epub 2015 Feb 15.
9
Validation of the acetylene rebreathing method for measurement of cardiac output at rest and during high-intensity exercise.用于测量静息和高强度运动时心输出量的乙炔重复呼吸法的验证
Clin Physiol. 1997 Mar;17(2):171-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1997.02323.x.
10
Reproducibility of automated pulse wave velocity measurement during exercise. Running head: pulse wave velocity during exercise.运动期间自动脉搏波速度测量的可重复性。标题:运动期间的脉搏波速度
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2006 Jun;99(6):564-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of Brachial Occlusion Technique for Beat-to-Beat Pulse Wave Analysis.桡动脉阻断技术用于实时脉搏波分析的可行性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;22(19):7285. doi: 10.3390/s22197285.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in mean arterial pressure of young and elderly people measured by oscilometry during inflation and deflation of the arm cuff.通过示波法在袖带充气和放气过程中测量的年轻人和老年人平均动脉压的差异。
Biomed Tech (Berl). 2016 Dec 1;61(6):611-621. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2015-0098.
2
Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound.五种从动脉波形计算心输出量的算法:与多普勒超声的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):392-402. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev254. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
Quantification of wave reflection using peripheral blood pressure waveforms.利用外周血压波形对波反射进行量化分析。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015 Jan;19(1):309-16. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2307273.
4
Accuracy and precision of echocardiography versus right heart catheterization for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension.超声心动图与右心导管检查在评估肺动脉高压方面的准确性和精确性。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4058-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
5
Wave reflection quantification based on pressure waveforms alone--methods, comparison, and clinical covariates.基于压力波形的波反射定量——方法、比较和临床协变量。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Mar;109(3):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.005. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
6
The L-arginine/asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio is improved by anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy in inflammatory arthropathies. Associations with aortic stiffness.抗肿瘤坏死因子-α治疗可改善炎性关节病中的 L-精氨酸/不对称二甲基精氨酸比值。与主动脉僵硬度的相关性。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Nov;225(1):160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.08.033. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
7
Reference values of aortic pulse wave velocity in a large healthy population aged between 3 and 18 years.3 至 18 岁健康人群的主动脉脉搏波速度参考值。
J Hypertens. 2012 Dec;30(12):2314-21. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328359562c.
8
Thermodilution and Fick cardiac outputs differ: impact on pulmonary hypertension evaluation.热稀释法和 Fick 心输出量存在差异:对肺动脉高压评估的影响。
Can Respir J. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):261-6. doi: 10.1155/2012/261793.
9
Ventilation-perfusion distribution in normal subjects.正常受试者的通气-灌注分布。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Sep;113(6):872-7. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00163.2012. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
10
Noninvasive continuous hemodynamic monitoring.非侵入性连续血流动力学监测。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Aug;26(4):267-78. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9375-8. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

通过肱动脉袖带阻断技术无创评估心输出量:与开路乙炔冲洗法的比较。

Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output by brachial occlusion-cuff technique: comparison with the open-circuit acetylene washin method.

作者信息

Sajgalik Pavol, Kremen Vaclav, Carlson Alex R, Fabian Vratislav, Kim Chul-Ho, Wheatley Courtney, Gerla Vaclav, Schirger John A, Olson Thomas P, Johnson Bruce D

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota;

1st Department of Internal Medicine, Cardio Angiology-International Clinical Research Center, Masaryk University; Brno, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Dec 1;121(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015
PMID:27765846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5206382/
Abstract

Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was -0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.

摘要

心输出量(CO)评估作为一项基本的血流动力学参数,一直是运动生理学、心脏病学和麻醉学领域的研究热点。现有的非侵入性技术在技术上具有挑战性,因此难以在临床或实验室环境之外使用。我们提出了一种使用单个上臂袖带进行非侵入性CO评估的新方法。该方法利用在收缩期上闭塞的20秒间隔内从肱动脉采集的动脉压力脉搏波信号。在一组12名健康个体(年龄27.7±5.4岁,50%为男性)中对该方法进行了评估,并与一种既定的非侵入性CO评估方法——开路乙炔法(OpCirc)在静息状态和低至中等强度运动期间进行了比较。通过袖带闭塞法和OpCirc技术评估,CO从静息状态到运动状态增加(静息状态下,分别为7.4±0.8和7.2±0.8;低强度运动时,分别为9.8±1.8和9.9±2.0;中等强度运动时,分别为14.1±2.8和14.8±3.2升/分钟)。与OpCirc相比,实验技术的平均误差为-0.25±1.02升/分钟,皮尔逊相关系数为0.96(静息+运动),仅静息状态下为0.21±0.42升/分钟,皮尔逊相关系数为0.87。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明两种方法之间具有良好的一致性(在95%界限内);重复性系数(RPC)=0.84升/分钟,静息状态下R=0.75,静息状态和运动期间RPC分别为2升/分钟,R=0.92。与一种既定的量化CO的方法相比,袖带闭塞法在静息状态以及轻度至中度运动时提供了相似的测量结果。因此,我们认为该方法有潜力作为一种新的非侵入性方法用于评估运动期间的CO。