Sajgalik Pavol, Kremen Vaclav, Carlson Alex R, Fabian Vratislav, Kim Chul-Ho, Wheatley Courtney, Gerla Vaclav, Schirger John A, Olson Thomas P, Johnson Bruce D
Department of Internal Medicine; Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic & Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota;
1st Department of Internal Medicine, Cardio Angiology-International Clinical Research Center, Masaryk University; Brno, Czech Republic.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Dec 1;121(6):1319-1325. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00981.2015. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Cardiac output (CO) assessment as a basic hemodynamic parameter has been of interest in exercise physiology, cardiology, and anesthesiology. Noninvasive techniques available are technically challenging, and thus difficult to use outside of a clinical or laboratory setting. We propose a novel method of noninvasive CO assessment using a single, upper-arm cuff. The method uses the arterial pressure pulse wave signal acquired from the brachial artery during 20-s intervals of suprasystolic occlusion. This method was evaluated in a cohort of 12 healthy individuals (age, 27.7 ± 5.4 yr, 50% men) and compared with an established method for noninvasive CO assessment, the open-circuit acetylene method (OpCirc) at rest, and during low- to moderate-intensity exercise. CO increased from rest to exercise (rest, 7.4 ± 0.8 vs. 7.2 ± 0.8; low, 9.8 ± 1.8 vs. 9.9 ± 2.0; moderate, 14.1 ± 2.8 vs. 14.8 ± 3.2 l/min) as assessed by the cuff-occlusion and OpCirc techniques, respectively. The average error of experimental technique compared with OpCirc was -0.25 ± 1.02 l/min, Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.96 (rest + exercise), and 0.21 ± 0.42 l/min with Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.87 (rest only). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated good agreement between methods (within 95% boundaries); the reproducibility coefficient (RPC) = 0.84 l/min with R = 0.75 at rest and RPC = 2 l/min with R = 0.92 at rest and during exercise, respectively. In comparison with an established method to quantify CO, the cuff-occlusion method provides similar measures at rest and with light to moderate exercise. Thus, we believe this method has the potential to be used as a new, noninvasive method for assessing CO during exercise.
心输出量(CO)评估作为一项基本的血流动力学参数,一直是运动生理学、心脏病学和麻醉学领域的研究热点。现有的非侵入性技术在技术上具有挑战性,因此难以在临床或实验室环境之外使用。我们提出了一种使用单个上臂袖带进行非侵入性CO评估的新方法。该方法利用在收缩期上闭塞的20秒间隔内从肱动脉采集的动脉压力脉搏波信号。在一组12名健康个体(年龄27.7±5.4岁,50%为男性)中对该方法进行了评估,并与一种既定的非侵入性CO评估方法——开路乙炔法(OpCirc)在静息状态和低至中等强度运动期间进行了比较。通过袖带闭塞法和OpCirc技术评估,CO从静息状态到运动状态增加(静息状态下,分别为7.4±0.8和7.2±0.8;低强度运动时,分别为9.8±1.8和9.9±2.0;中等强度运动时,分别为14.1±2.8和14.8±3.2升/分钟)。与OpCirc相比,实验技术的平均误差为-0.25±1.02升/分钟,皮尔逊相关系数为0.96(静息+运动),仅静息状态下为0.21±0.42升/分钟,皮尔逊相关系数为0.87。布兰德-奥特曼分析表明两种方法之间具有良好的一致性(在95%界限内);重复性系数(RPC)=0.84升/分钟,静息状态下R=0.75,静息状态和运动期间RPC分别为2升/分钟,R=0.92。与一种既定的量化CO的方法相比,袖带闭塞法在静息状态以及轻度至中度运动时提供了相似的测量结果。因此,我们认为该方法有潜力作为一种新的非侵入性方法用于评估运动期间的CO。