• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Crossing the perspectives of patients, families, and physicians on cancer treatment: A qualitative study.患者、家属和医生对癌症治疗的不同观点:一项定性研究。
Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 28;8(13):22113-22122. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12770.
2
Qualitative approach to patient-reported outcomes in oncology: protocol of a French study.肿瘤学中患者报告结局的定性研究方法:一项法国研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e008042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008042.
3
Patients' quality of life during active cancer treatment: a qualitative study.癌症积极治疗期间患者的生活质量:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 4;18(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4868-6.
4
Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients' perspectives.医生与癌症患者之间关于补充和替代医学的沟通:探索患者的观点。
Psychooncology. 2002 May-Jun;11(3):212-20. doi: 10.1002/pon.552.
5
The Subjective Dimension of Integrative Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Perspectives, Themes, and Observations of Experienced Doctors from the Area of Anthroposophic Medicine.《整体癌症护理的主观维度:一项探索经验丰富的人智医学领域医生的观点、主题和观察的定性研究》
Explore (NY). 2018 Sep;14(5):342-351. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
6
Opportunities and challenges to improving end-of-life care for seriously ill elderly patients: a qualitative study of generalist physicians.改善重症老年患者临终关怀的机遇与挑战:对全科医生的定性研究
J Palliat Med. 2005 Apr;8(2):291-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.291.
7
A qualitative analysis of patient and family perspectives of palliative care.对患者及家属姑息治疗观点的定性分析。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Mar;18(3):282-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0155. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
8
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
9
Perspectives of Medical Specialists on Sharing Decisions in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study Concerning Chemotherapy Decisions With Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma.医学专家对癌症治疗中共同决策的看法:一项关于复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者化疗决策的定性研究
Oncologist. 2015 Oct;20(10):1182-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0095. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
Perceptions of patients, families, physicians and nurses regarding challenges in cancer disclosure: A descriptive qualitative study.患者、家属、医生和护士对癌症信息披露挑战的看法:一项描述性定性研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec;25:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experience in Neoplastic Disease in Light of the Statements of Doctors Who Are Oncological Patients.从肿瘤患者医生的陈述看肿瘤疾病中的患者体验
J Patient Exp. 2024 Sep 9;11:23743735241279643. doi: 10.1177/23743735241279643. eCollection 2024.
2
Healthcare provider assessments of caregiver communication behaviors during gynecologic Cancer treatment appointments.医疗服务提供者对妇科癌症治疗预约期间护理人员沟通行为的评估。
PEC Innov. 2024 Feb 1;4:100259. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100259. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Facilitators and Challenges in Patient's Satisfaction with Quality of Cervical Cancer Care in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Puducherry, India: A Qualitative Study.印度本地治里一家三级护理医院患者对宫颈癌护理质量满意度的促进因素与挑战:一项定性研究
South Asian J Cancer. 2023 Apr 12;12(3):250-255. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761283. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on Core Components of Therapeutic Alliance for Adolescents and Young Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Qualitative Study.患者、照料者和临床医生对晚期癌症青少年和年轻成人治疗联盟核心要素的观点:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328153. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28153.
5
CT-derived body composition analysis could possibly replace DXA and BIA to monitor NET-patients.CT 衍生的身体成分分析可能可以替代 DXA 和 BIA 来监测 NET 患者。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 4;12(1):13419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17611-3.
6
A specific method for qualitative medical research: the IPSE (Inductive Process to analyze the Structure of lived Experience) approach.一种特定的定性医学研究方法:IPSE(归纳过程分析生活经验结构)方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01099-4.
7
Operationalizing patient-centered cancer care: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature on cancer patients' needs, values, and preferences.将以患者为中心的癌症护理付诸实践:癌症患者需求、价值观和偏好的定性文献的系统回顾和综合。
Psychooncology. 2020 Nov;29(11):1723-1733. doi: 10.1002/pon.5500. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
8
Exploratory Factor Analysis of a Patient-Centered Cancer Care Measure to Support Improved Assessment of Patients' Experiences.以患者为中心的癌症护理措施的探索性因素分析,以支持对患者体验的改善评估。
Value Health. 2020 Mar;23(3):351-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes and experiences of family involvement in cancer consultations: a qualitative exploration of patient and family member perspectives.家庭参与癌症会诊的态度与经历:对患者及家庭成员观点的质性探索
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Oct;24(10):4131-40. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3237-8. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
2
Quantity and Quality of Life: Duties of Care in Life-Limiting Illness.生命的数量与质量:临终疾病中的照护职责
JAMA. 2016 Jan 19;315(3):267-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.19206.
3
Assessing needs of family members of inpatients with advanced cancer.评估晚期癌症住院患者家庭成员的需求。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016 Jul;25(4):592-9. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12441. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
4
Unmet needs mediate the relationship between symptoms and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.未满足的需求介导了乳腺癌幸存者症状与生活质量之间的关系。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2025-2033. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2994-0. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
5
Health Care Professionals' Responses to Religious or Spiritual Statements by Surrogate Decision Makers During Goals-of-Care Discussions.医疗保健专业人员对代理人决策者在目标关怀讨论中提出的宗教或精神问题的回应。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Oct;175(10):1662-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4124.
6
Doctors discussing religion and spirituality: A systematic literature review.医生对宗教与灵性的探讨:一项系统的文献综述。
Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;30(4):327-37. doi: 10.1177/0269216315600912. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
7
A Qualitative Investigation of Health Care Professionals', Patients' and Partners' Views on Psychosocial Issues and Related Interventions for Couples Coping with Cancer.一项关于医护人员、患者及其伴侣对心理社会问题以及夫妻应对癌症相关干预措施看法的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0133837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133837. eCollection 2015.
8
Unmet needs and depression among carers of people newly diagnosed with cancer.癌症新确诊患者照料者的未满足需求与抑郁状况
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Sep;51(14):2049-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.129. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
9
Qualitative approach to patient-reported outcomes in oncology: protocol of a French study.肿瘤学中患者报告结局的定性研究方法:一项法国研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 10;5(7):e008042. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008042.
10
Breaking Bad News in Oncology: A Metasynthesis.肿瘤学中坏消息告知的元分析
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 1;33(22):2437-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.6759. Epub 2015 Jun 29.

患者、家属和医生对癌症治疗的不同观点:一项定性研究。

Crossing the perspectives of patients, families, and physicians on cancer treatment: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Orri Massimiliano, Sibeoni Jordan, Bousquet Guilhem, Labey Mathilde, Gueguen Juliette, Laporte Cyril, Winterman Sabine, Picard Camille, Nascimbeni Clara, Verneuil Laurence, Revah-Levy Anne

机构信息

Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Adolescent, Argenteuil Hospital Centre, Argenteuil, France.

ECSTRA Team, UMR-1153, Inserm, Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Mar 28;8(13):22113-22122. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12770.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.12770
PMID:27769072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5400651/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients, family members, and physicians participate in cancer care, but their perspectives about what is helpful during cancer treatment have rarely been compared. The aim of this study was to compare these three perspectives.

METHODS

Multicenter qualitative study (with previously published protocol) based on 90 semi-structured interviews. Participants (purposively selected until data saturation) came from three different subsamples: (i) patients with cancer (n=30), (ii) their relatives (n=30), and (iii) their referring physicians (n=10, interviewed more than once).

RESULTS

Our analysis found 3 main axes (perceived positive effects of cancer treatment, perceived negative effects of cancer treatment, doctor-physician relationship), each composed of 2 main themes. The findings showed that patients, families, and physicians shared the long-term objective of increasing survival (while reducing side effects). However, patients and relatives also pointed out the importance of living with cancer each day and thus of factors helping them to live as well as possible in daily life. The physicians' difficulty in coping with patients' suffering may limit their access to elements that can improve patients' capacity to live as well as possible.

CONCLUSIONS

During cancer treatment (and not only at the end of life), attention should be given to enhancing the capacity of patients to live as well as possible (not only as long as possible) to meet the goals of patient-centered care and satisfy this important need of patients and families.

摘要

目的

患者、家庭成员和医生都参与癌症治疗,但他们对于癌症治疗期间哪些因素有帮助的观点很少被比较。本研究的目的是比较这三种观点。

方法

基于90次半结构化访谈的多中心定性研究(采用先前发表的方案)。参与者(经过目的性抽样直至数据饱和)来自三个不同的子样本:(i)癌症患者(n = 30),(ii)他们的亲属(n = 30),以及(iii)他们的转诊医生(n = 10,接受多次访谈)。

结果

我们的分析发现了3个主要维度(癌症治疗的感知积极效果、癌症治疗的感知消极效果、医患关系),每个维度由2个主要主题组成。研究结果表明,患者、家属和医生都认同提高生存率(同时减少副作用)的长期目标。然而,患者和亲属也指出了每天与癌症共存的重要性,以及那些帮助他们在日常生活中尽可能正常生活的因素的重要性。医生在应对患者痛苦方面的困难可能会限制他们获取能够提高患者尽可能正常生活能力的因素。

结论

在癌症治疗期间(而不仅仅是在生命末期),应关注提高患者尽可能正常生活的能力(而不仅仅是尽可能延长生命),以实现以患者为中心的护理目标,并满足患者和家庭的这一重要需求。