Greene George J, Swann Greg, Fought Angela J, Carballo-Diéguez Alex, Hope Thomas J, Kiser Patrick F, Mustanski Brian, D'Aquila Richard T
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2017 May;21(5):1336-1349. doi: 10.1007/s10461-016-1565-9.
HIV prevention method preferences were evaluated among 512 U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM; median age: 22 years). Approximately 90 % consistently preferred one option across pairwise comparisons of condoms, daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and long-acting PrEP delivered via either an injectable or one of two types of PrEP implants differing in visibility. Condoms were most frequently preferred (33.8 %), followed by non-visible implants (21.5 %), and oral PrEP (17.0 %); HIV risk was reported by more choosing implants. In a follow-up question comparing the four PrEP options only, daily oral pills and non-visible implants were most frequently preferred (35.5 and 34.3 %, respectively), followed by injections (25.2 %) and visible implants (4.3 %). An inductive, open-coding approach determined that convenience, duration of protection, and privacy were the most commonly cited reasons for a PrEP method choice, and associated with self-report of HIV risk. Tailoring PrEP product development to privacy and other concerns important to those at highest HIV risk may improve HIV prevention.
在512名美国男男性行为者(MSM;中位年龄:22岁)中评估了对HIV预防方法的偏好。在对避孕套、每日口服暴露前预防(PrEP)以及通过注射或两种不同可见性的PrEP植入物之一提供的长效PrEP进行两两比较时,约90%的人始终偏好一种选择。最常被偏好的是避孕套(33.8%),其次是不可见植入物(21.5%)和口服PrEP(17.0%);选择植入物的人报告的HIV风险更高。在后续仅比较四种PrEP选项的问题中,最常被偏好的是每日口服药丸和不可见植入物(分别为35.5%和34.3%),其次是注射(25.2%)和可见植入物(4.3%)。一种归纳性的开放编码方法确定,便利性、保护持续时间和隐私是选择PrEP方法时最常提及的原因,并且与HIV风险的自我报告相关。根据隐私和其他对HIV风险最高的人群重要的问题来定制PrEP产品开发可能会改善HIV预防。