Sollmann Nico, Hauck Theresa, Tussis Lorena, Ille Sebastian, Maurer Stefanie, Boeckh-Behrens Tobias, Ringel Florian, Meyer Bernhard, Krieg Sandro M
Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
BMC Neurosci. 2016 Oct 24;17(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12868-016-0305-4.
The spatial resolution of repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for language mapping is largely unknown. Thus, to determine a minimum spatial resolution of rTMS for language mapping, we evaluated the mapping sessions derived from 19 healthy volunteers for cortical hotspots of no-response errors. Then, the distances between hotspots (stimulation points with a high error rate) and adjacent mapping points (stimulation points with low error rates) were evaluated.
Mean distance values of 13.8 ± 6.4 mm (from hotspots to ventral points, range 0.7-30.7 mm), 10.8 ± 4.8 mm (from hotspots to dorsal points, range 2.0-26.5 mm), 16.6 ± 4.8 mm (from hotspots to apical points, range 0.9-27.5 mm), and 13.8 ± 4.3 mm (from hotspots to caudal points, range 2.0-24.2 mm) were measured.
According to the results, the minimum spatial resolution of rTMS should principally allow for the identification of a particular gyrus, and according to the literature, it is in good accordance with the spatial resolution of direct cortical stimulation (DCS). Since measurement was performed between hotspots and adjacent mapping points and not on a finer-grained basis, we only refer to a minimum spatial resolution. Furthermore, refinement of our results within the scope of a prospective study combining rTMS and DCS for resolution measurement during language mapping should be the next step.
重复导航经颅磁刺激(rTMS)用于语言映射的空间分辨率很大程度上未知。因此,为了确定rTMS用于语言映射的最小空间分辨率,我们评估了19名健康志愿者的映射会话,以确定无反应错误的皮质热点。然后,评估了热点(错误率高的刺激点)与相邻映射点(错误率低的刺激点)之间的距离。
测量得到的平均距离值分别为:从热点到腹侧点为13.8 ± 6.4毫米(范围0.7 - 30.7毫米),从热点到背侧点为10.8 ± 4.8毫米(范围2.0 - 26.5毫米),从热点到顶点为16.6 ± 4.8毫米(范围0.9 - 27.5毫米),从热点到尾侧点为13.8 ± 4.3毫米(范围2.0 - 24.2毫米)。
根据结果,rTMS的最小空间分辨率原则上应允许识别特定的脑回,并且根据文献,这与直接皮质刺激(DCS)的空间分辨率高度一致。由于测量是在热点和相邻映射点之间进行的,而不是在更精细的基础上进行,所以我们仅提及最小空间分辨率。此外,下一步应该是在前瞻性研究的范围内,结合rTMS和DCS进行语言映射期间分辨率测量,以完善我们的结果。