• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为痴呆症患者做决策:替代决策者是如何做出决定的?

Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?

作者信息

Fetherstonhaugh Deirdre, McAuliffe Linda, Bauer Michael, Shanley Chris

机构信息

Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103301. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2015-103301
PMID:27780889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For people living with dementia, the capacity to make important decisions about themselves diminishes as their condition advances. As a result, important decisions (affecting lifestyle, medical treatment and end of life) become the responsibility of someone else, as the surrogate decision-maker. This study investigated how surrogate decision-makers make important decisions on behalf of a person living with dementia.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 family members who had formally or informally taken on the role of surrogate decision-maker. Thematic analysis of interviews was undertaken, which involved identifying, analysing and reporting themes arising from the data.

RESULTS

Analysis revealed three main themes associated with the process of surrogate decision-making in dementia: knowing the person's wishes; consulting with others and striking a balance. Most participants reported that there was not an advance care plan in place for the person living with dementia. Even when the prior wishes of the person with dementia were known, the process of decision-making was often fraught with complexity.

DISCUSSION

Surrogate decision-making on behalf of a person living with dementia is often a difficult process. Advance care planning can play an important role in supporting this process. Healthcare professionals can recognise the challenges that surrogate decision-makers face and support them through advance care planning in a way that suits their needs and circumstances.

摘要

背景

对于痴呆症患者而言,随着病情发展,他们为自己做出重要决策的能力会逐渐下降。因此,诸如影响生活方式、医疗治疗及临终等重要决策,就落到了他人(即替代决策者)的肩上。本研究调查了替代决策者如何代表痴呆症患者做出重要决策。

方法

对34名正式或非正式承担替代决策者角色的家庭成员进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行了主题分析,包括识别、分析和报告数据中出现的主题。

结果

分析揭示了与痴呆症替代决策过程相关的三个主要主题:了解患者的意愿;与他人协商并达成平衡。大多数参与者表示,痴呆症患者没有预先制定的护理计划。即使了解痴呆症患者之前的意愿,决策过程往往也充满复杂性。

讨论

代表痴呆症患者进行替代决策通常是一个艰难的过程。预先护理计划在支持这一过程中可发挥重要作用。医疗保健专业人员能够认识到替代决策者所面临的挑战,并通过预先护理计划以适合其需求和情况的方式为他们提供支持。

相似文献

1
Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?为痴呆症患者做决策:替代决策者是如何做出决定的?
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103301. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: Healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities.为痴呆症患者的替代决策者提供支持:医疗保健专业人员、组织及社区的责任。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Sep;25(5):1563-1570. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12456. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
3
Uncertainty in surrogate decision-making about end-of-life care for people with dementia: An integrative review.痴呆症患者临终护理替代决策中的不确定性:一项综合综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Aug;80(8):3103-3118. doi: 10.1111/jan.16038. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
Dying well with reduced agency: a scoping review and thematic synthesis of the decision-making process in dementia, traumatic brain injury and frailty.在能动性降低的情况下安详离世:关于痴呆症、创伤性脑损伤和衰弱患者决策过程的范围综述与主题综合分析
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jul 27;17(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0129-x.
5
Substitute decision makers' experiences of making decisions at end of life for older persons with dementia: A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.替代决策人在老年人痴呆末期的决策体验:系统回顾和定性元综合。
Dementia (London). 2020 Jul;19(5):1532-1559. doi: 10.1177/1471301218802127. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
Surrogate decision makers' understanding of dementia patients' prior wishes for end-of-life care.替代决策者对痴呆症患者生前临终护理意愿的理解。
J Aging Health. 2009 Jun;21(4):627-50. doi: 10.1177/0898264309333316. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
7
Narrative Interest Standard: A Novel Approach to Surrogate Decision-Making for People With Dementia.叙事利益标准:一种用于痴呆症患者代理决策的新方法。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1016-1020. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx107.
8
Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia.制定一个应用模型,以便在生命末期就痴呆症患者的护理做出决策。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0252464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252464. eCollection 2021.
9
Planning ahead with dementia: what role can advance care planning play? A review on opportunities and challenges.提前规划应对痴呆症:预先护理计划能发挥什么作用?关于机遇与挑战的综述
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Dec 30;148:w14706. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14706. eCollection 2018 Dec 17.
10
What Matters to Persons With Dementia at the End of Life: Perspectives of Proxy Decision Makers.临终时痴呆症患者的重要事项:代理决策者的观点。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2018 Oct;20(5):478-485. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000465.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Diagnosis: Exploring Residual Autonomy in Dementia Through a Systematic Review.超越诊断:通过系统综述探索痴呆症患者的剩余自主性
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 May 14;61(5):895. doi: 10.3390/medicina61050895.
2
Care Decisions in the Hospital: Challenges for Family Members of Hospitalized Persons With Dementia.医院中的护理决策:痴呆症住院患者家属面临的挑战
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jul;70(1):1-9.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.03.025. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Development and validation of a clinical prediction tool to estimate survival in community-dwelling adults living with dementia: a protocol.
开发和验证一种用于估计社区居住的痴呆症患者生存的临床预测工具的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 17;14(11):e086231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086231.
4
'If you've lost your personality, there's no point in changing the valve'-a qualitative study of older adults' attitudes towards treatment of aortic stenosis with comorbid dementia.如果你的个性已经丧失,那么更换瓣膜就没有意义了——一项针对伴有痴呆的老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗态度的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 12;14(11):e086674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086674.
5
Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia.对有和没有痴呆症的成年人进行初级保健预先医疗指示计划的 SHARING Choices 试验的定性评估。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3413-3426. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19154. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
6
Carers' experiences and perspectives of the use of anticholinergic medications in people living with dementia: Analysis of an online discussion forum.照顾者对痴呆症患者使用抗胆碱能药物的体验和看法:对在线讨论论坛的分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13972. doi: 10.1111/hex.13972.
7
Ethics, design, and implementation criteria of digital assistive technologies for people with dementia from a multiple stakeholder perspective: a qualitative study.从多方利益相关者角度看痴呆症患者的数字辅助技术的伦理、设计和实施标准:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jul 27;25(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01080-6.
8
Advance Care Planning in the Context of Dementia: Defining Concordance.痴呆症背景下的预先医疗指示规划:定义一致性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae029.
9
High-Intensity Care for Nursing Home Residents with Severe Dementia Hospitalized at the End of Life: A Mixed Methods Study.终末期住院的重度痴呆养老院居民的强化护理:一项混合方法研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):871-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
10
Staff and Proxy Views of Multiple Family Member Involvement in Decision Making for Nursing Home Residents With Advanced Dementia.员工和代理人对养老院中患有晚期痴呆症的居民的决策中多家庭成员参与的看法。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 Oct 1;25(5):263-270. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000957. Epub 2023 May 26.