• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

叙事利益标准:一种用于痴呆症患者代理决策的新方法。

Narrative Interest Standard: A Novel Approach to Surrogate Decision-Making for People With Dementia.

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts.

Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1016-1020. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx107.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnx107
PMID:29617766
Abstract

Dementia is a common neurodegenerative process that can significantly impair decision-making capacity as the disease progresses. When a person is found to lack capacity to make a decision, a surrogate decision-maker is generally sought to aid in decision-making. Typical bases for surrogate decision-making include the substituted judgment standard and the best interest standard. Given the heterogeneous and progressive course of dementia, however, these standards for surrogate decision-making are often insufficient in providing guidance for the decision-making for a person with dementia, escalating the likelihood of conflict in these decisions. In this article, the narrative interest standard is presented as a novel and more appropriate approach to surrogate decision-making for people with dementia. Through case presentation and ethical analysis, the standard mechanisms for surrogate decision-making for people with dementia are reviewed and critiqued. The narrative interest standard is then introduced and discussed as a dementia-specific model for surrogate decision-making. Through incorporation of elements of a best interest standard in focusing on the current benefit-burden ratio and elements of narrative to provide context, history, and flexibility for values and preferences that may change over time, the narrative interest standard allows for elaboration of an enriched context for surrogate decision-making for people with dementia. More importantly, however, a narrative approach encourages the direct contribution from people with dementia in authoring the story of what matters to them in their lives.

摘要

痴呆症是一种常见的神经退行性疾病,随着疾病的进展,会严重损害决策能力。当发现某人缺乏决策能力时,通常会寻找代理人来协助决策。代理决策的典型依据包括替代判断标准和最佳利益标准。然而,鉴于痴呆症的异质性和进行性病程,这些代理决策标准通常不足以为痴呆症患者的决策提供指导,从而增加了这些决策发生冲突的可能性。本文提出叙事利益标准作为痴呆症患者代理决策的一种新颖且更合适的方法。通过案例介绍和伦理分析,回顾和批判了痴呆症患者代理决策的标准机制。然后介绍并讨论了叙事利益标准作为一种特定于痴呆症的代理决策模型。通过纳入最佳利益标准的要素,关注当前的受益-负担比,以及叙事的要素,为可能随时间变化的价值观和偏好提供背景、历史和灵活性,叙事利益标准为痴呆症患者的代理决策提供了更丰富的背景。然而,更重要的是,叙事方法鼓励痴呆症患者直接参与撰写他们生活中重要事情的故事。

相似文献

1
Narrative Interest Standard: A Novel Approach to Surrogate Decision-Making for People With Dementia.叙事利益标准:一种用于痴呆症患者代理决策的新方法。
Gerontologist. 2018 Nov 3;58(6):1016-1020. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx107.
2
Surrogate decision-making: judgment standard preferences of older adults.替代决策制定:老年人的判断标准偏好
Soc Work Health Care. 2003;37(2):1-16. doi: 10.1300/J010v37n02_01.
3
Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?为痴呆症患者做决策:替代决策者是如何做出决定的?
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103301. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Reconsidering Gold Standards for Surrogate Decision Making for People with Dementia.重新考虑痴呆症患者替代决策的黄金标准。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;44(4):641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.08.002.
5
Substituted judgment: the limitations of autonomy in surrogate decision making.替代判断:替代决策中自主权的局限性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1514-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0688-8. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
6
Prediction of life-story narrative for end-of-life surrogate's decision-making is inadequate: a Q-methodology study.预测临终替代决策的生活故事叙述是不充分的:一项 Q 方法论研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 3;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0368-8.
7
Why doesn't a family member of a person with advanced dementia use a substituted judgment when making a decision for that person?为什么晚期痴呆症患者的家庭成员在为该患者做决定时不采用替代判断法呢?
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;14(8):659-67. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000203179.94036.69.
8
Love as a regulative ideal in surrogate decision making.爱作为替代决策中的一种规范性理想。
J Med Philos. 2014 Oct;39(5):523-42. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhu034.
9
Providing support to surrogate decision-makers for people living with dementia: Healthcare professional, organisational and community responsibilities.为痴呆症患者的替代决策者提供支持:医疗保健专业人员、组织及社区的责任。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Sep;25(5):1563-1570. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12456. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
[Autonomy and dementia Part II: autonomy and representation: a possible combination?].[自主性与痴呆症 第二部分:自主性与代表性:一种可能的结合?]
Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2011 Jun;9(2):203-10. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2011.0270.

引用本文的文献

1
Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes.放弃提供目标一致的护理的目标:预先护理计划以改善护理人员的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):3006-3011. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18000. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
Reconsidering Gold Standards for Surrogate Decision Making for People with Dementia.重新考虑痴呆症患者替代决策的黄金标准。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;44(4):641-647. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2021.08.002.
3
Longitudinal differences in everyday preferences: Comparisons between people with cognitive impairment and their care partners.
日常偏好的纵向差异:认知障碍者与其护理伙伴之间的比较。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 8;37(1). doi: 10.1002/gps.5620.
4
Investigation of opposition to diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in older people hospitalized in acute geriatric services: the OPTAH pilot study protocol.急性老年服务住院老年人对诊断或治疗程序的反对情况调查:OPTAH 试点研究方案。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Dec 14;6(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00742-7.
5
Informed consent, therapeutic misconception, and clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.知情同意、治疗误解与阿尔茨海默病的临床试验
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020 May;35(5):430-435. doi: 10.1002/gps.5262. Epub 2020 Jan 26.