• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定一个应用模型,以便在生命末期就痴呆症患者的护理做出决策。

Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia.

机构信息

Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Centre for Dementia Palliative Care Research, Division of Psychiatry, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0252464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252464. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252464
PMID:34043728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8158904/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many people with dementia reach the end-of-life without an advance care plan. Many are not ready to have conversations about end-of-life, and decision-making is left to their families and professionals when they no longer have capacity. Carers may benefit from further support with decision-making. To develop this support, it is important to understand the decision-making process.

AIM

Explore with family carers and people living with dementia the decision-making process and factors that influence decision-making in dementia end of life care, to produce a model of decision-making in the context of dementia end-of-life care.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 21 family carers and 11 people with dementia in England (2018-2019) from memory clinics, general practice and carer organisations. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and findings were mapped onto the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making model, refined to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia.

RESULTS

Participants described five key decisions towards the end-of-life as examples of decision making. We used these experiences to produce a modified model of decision-making in dementia end-of-life-care. The model considers the contextual factors that influence the decision-making process, including: personal preferences; advance care planning and Lasting Power of Attorney; capacity and health and wellbeing of the person with dementia; support from others and clarity of roles. The decision-making process consists of seven inter-linked stages: 1) identifying the decision maker or team; 2) sharing and exchanging information; 3) clarifying values and preferences; 4) managing and considering emotions; 5) considering the feasibility of options; 6) balancing preferred choice and the actual choice; and 7) implementation and reflecting on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified model breaks down the decision-making process and attempts to simplify the process while capturing the subtle nuances of decision making. It provides a framework for conversations and supporting decisions by carers.

摘要

背景

许多痴呆症患者在没有预先护理计划的情况下走到生命的尽头。许多人还没有准备好谈论生命尽头的事情,当他们失去能力时,决策就留给了他们的家人和专业人士。护理人员可能会从进一步的决策支持中受益。为了提供这种支持,了解决策过程是很重要的。

目的

探索家庭护理人员和痴呆症患者在痴呆症临终护理中的决策过程和影响决策的因素,以在痴呆症临终护理背景下建立决策模型。

方法

2018 年至 2019 年期间,在英国的记忆诊所、普通科医生和护理人员组织中,对 21 名家庭护理人员和 11 名痴呆症患者进行了半结构化访谈。使用主题分析对访谈进行分析,并将研究结果映射到跨专业共享决策模型上,以完善痴呆症决策模型。

结果

参与者描述了临终前的五个关键决策作为决策的例子。我们利用这些经验,制定了一个痴呆症临终护理决策的修正模型。该模型考虑了影响决策过程的背景因素,包括:个人偏好、预先护理计划和持久授权书、痴呆症患者的能力和健康状况、来自他人的支持以及角色的明确性。决策过程由七个相互关联的阶段组成:1)确定决策者或团队;2)分享和交换信息;3)澄清价值观和偏好;4)管理和考虑情绪;5)考虑选择方案的可行性;6)平衡首选选择和实际选择;7)实施和反思结果。

结论

修正后的模型分解了决策过程,并试图在简化过程的同时捕捉决策的微妙之处。它为护理人员提供了一个用于对话和支持决策的框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a75/8158904/df50370f558b/pone.0252464.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a75/8158904/df50370f558b/pone.0252464.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a75/8158904/df50370f558b/pone.0252464.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing an applied model for making decisions towards the end of life about care for someone with dementia.制定一个应用模型,以便在生命末期就痴呆症患者的护理做出决策。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0252464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252464. eCollection 2021.
2
Acceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.接受度使用决策辅助工具支持生命末期的痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者:定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14123. doi: 10.1111/hex.14123.
3
End-of-life care: A qualitative study comparing the views of people with dementia and family carers.终末期照护:一项比较痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者观点的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;32(3):631-642. doi: 10.1177/0269216317736033. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Everyday decision-making in dementia: findings from a longitudinal interview study of people with dementia and family carers.痴呆症患者的日常决策:一项对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者进行的纵向访谈研究的结果。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jun;25(6):949-61. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213000306. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
5
A decision aid to support family carers of people living with dementia towards the end-of-life: Coproduction process, outcome and reflections.一种支持痴呆症患者临终阶段家庭照料者的决策辅助工具:共同制作过程、结果与思考。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1677-1691. doi: 10.1111/hex.13307. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
A "separation of worlds": The support and social networks of family carers of people with dementia at the end of life, and the possible role of the internet.一个“世界的分离”:生命末期痴呆患者的家庭照顾者的支持和社交网络,以及互联网的可能作用。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):e223-e232. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12701. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK.无能力痴呆症患者决策制定:英国家庭照护者的定性研究。
BMJ. 2010 Aug 18;341:c4184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4184.
8
Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Do Family Carers Know the Treatment Preferences of People with Early Dementia?痴呆症患者的预先护理计划:家庭护理人员是否了解早期痴呆症患者的治疗偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0159056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159056. eCollection 2016.
9
The experiences and preparedness of family carers for best interest decision-making of a relative living with advanced dementia: A qualitative study.有高级认知障碍的亲属的家庭照顾者在最佳利益决策方面的经验和准备情况:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Jul;74(7):1595-1604. doi: 10.1111/jan.13576. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
10
Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide?为痴呆症患者做决策:替代决策者是如何做出决定的?
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):35-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103301. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
From living well to dying well with dementia: The significance of an expanded understanding of loss for end-of-life care.从与痴呆症相伴的美好生活到善终:拓展对丧失的理解对临终关怀的意义。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 1;19:26323524251347653. doi: 10.1177/26323524251347653. eCollection 2025.
2
Co-Designing a Palliative Dementia Care Framework to Support Holistic Assessment and Decision Making: The EMBED-Care Framework.共同设计一个支持全面评估和决策的姑息性痴呆症护理框架:EMBED-Care 框架。
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70011. doi: 10.1111/hex.70011.
3
Acceptability of Using a Decision Aid to Support Family Carers of People With Dementia Towards the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review.绘制和理解为痴呆症患者提供营养和水合作用的决策过程:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Dec 2;20(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01931-y.
2
Supporting families in end-of-life care and bereavement in the COVID-19 era.在新冠疫情时代为临终关怀及丧亲之痛中的家庭提供支持。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1245-1248. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000745. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Is preparation for end of life associated with pre-death grief in caregivers of people with dementia?
接受度使用决策辅助工具支持生命末期的痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者:定性研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14123. doi: 10.1111/hex.14123.
4
A palliative care goals model for people with dementia and their family: Consensus achieved in an international Delphi study.痴呆症患者及其家属的姑息治疗目标模型:国际 Delphi 研究中达成的共识。
Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;38(4):457-470. doi: 10.1177/02692163241234579.
5
Co-design of a theory-based implementation plan for a holistic eHealth assessment and decision support framework for people with dementia in care homes.为养老院痴呆症患者设计一个基于理论的整体电子健康评估与决策支持框架实施计划的协同设计。
Digit Health. 2023 Nov 28;9:20552076231211118. doi: 10.1177/20552076231211118. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
6
Experiences of hospice dementia care: A qualitative study of bereaved carers and hospice clinicians.临终关怀痴呆症护理体验:对丧亲护理者和临终关怀临床医生的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 6;18(11):e0286493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286493. eCollection 2023.
7
Shared decision-making for children with medical complexity in community health services: a scoping review.社区卫生服务中医疗复杂性儿童的共同决策:范围综述。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Apr;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-001866.
8
Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review.痴呆患者的共同决策:范围综述。
Dementia (London). 2023 May;22(4):875-909. doi: 10.1177/14713012231156976. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
9
A Situation-Specific Theory of End-of-Life Communication in Nursing Homes.疗养院临终关怀沟通的情境特定理论。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010869.
10
A feasibility study of a decision aid to support family carers of people with severe dementia or those towards the end-of-life.支持严重痴呆或生命末期患者的家庭照顾者的决策辅助工具的可行性研究。
Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;36(9):1432-1439. doi: 10.1177/02692163221122379. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
临终准备是否与痴呆患者照顾者的死前悲伤有关?
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Jun;32(6):753-763. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220000289. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review.决策辅助工具在痴呆症护理中的应用:系统评价。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 Oct;31(10):1403-1419. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000826.
5
Advancing research on advance care planning in dementia.推进痴呆症预立医疗照护计划的研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;33(3):259-261. doi: 10.1177/0269216319826411.
6
Guiding practitioners through end of life care for people with dementia: The use of heuristics.指导临床医生为痴呆症患者提供临终关怀:使用启发式方法。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 14;13(11):e0206422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206422. eCollection 2018.
7
Perspectives of people with dementia and carers on advance care planning and end-of-life care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.痴呆症患者和护理人员对预先护理计划和临终关怀的看法:定性研究的系统评价和主题综合。
Palliat Med. 2019 Mar;33(3):274-290. doi: 10.1177/0269216318809571. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Meaningful connections in dementia end of life care in long term care homes.长期护理院痴呆症临终关怀中的有意义联系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 24;18(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1882-9.
9
Patient involvement in qualitative data analysis in a trial of a patient-centred intervention: Reconciling lay knowledge and scientific method.患者参与一项以患者为中心的干预试验的定性数据分析:调和常识和科学方法。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1111-1121. doi: 10.1111/hex.12814. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Shared Decision Making About Housing Transitions for Persons With Dementia: A Four-Case Care Network Perspective.关于痴呆症患者住房转移的共同决策:四个案例的护理网络视角。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):822-834. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny073.