Suppr超能文献

词汇判断任务中词汇加工的动态调整:跨试次序列效应

Dynamic adjustment of lexical processing in the lexical decision task: Cross-trial sequence effects.

作者信息

Balota David A, Aschenbrenner Andrew J, Yap Melvin J

机构信息

a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , Washington University in St. Louis , Louis , MO , USA.

b Department of Psychology , National University of Singapore , Singapore.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct 26:1-10. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240814.

Abstract

There has been growing interest in dynamic changes in the lexical processing system across trials, which have typically been assessed via linear mixed effect modelling. In the current study, we explore the influence of previous trial lexicality and previous trial perceptual degradation on the effect of lexicality and degradation on the current trial. The results of analyses of three datasets (two previously published studies and a new study) provide evidence for a robust four-way interaction among previous trial lexicality and degradation and current trial lexicality and degradation effects. Discussion emphasizes how priming of relevant dimensions (clear vs. degraded or word vs. nonword) within the experimental context modulates the influence of degradation on the current trial as a function of lexicality. These results suggest that in lexical decision there are robust lingering effects of the previous stimulus and response that carry over to the current stimulus and response, and participants cannot tune task-related systems to only the present trial. Importantly, although these complex relationships are theoretically important regarding lexical and decision level processes, these complexities also reinforce Keith Rayner's emphasis on on-line eye-tracking measures during reading as the most straightforward window into word-level processes engaged during reading.

摘要

人们对词汇加工系统在不同试验中的动态变化越来越感兴趣,这种变化通常通过线性混合效应模型进行评估。在当前的研究中,我们探讨了前一次试验的词汇性和前一次试验的感知退化对当前试验中词汇性和退化效应的影响。对三个数据集(两项先前发表的研究和一项新研究)的分析结果为前一次试验的词汇性和退化与当前试验的词汇性和退化效应之间强大的四向交互作用提供了证据。讨论强调了在实验背景下相关维度(清晰与退化或单词与非单词)的启动如何根据词汇性调节退化对当前试验的影响。这些结果表明,在词汇判断中,前一次刺激和反应存在强大的残留效应,并延续到当前的刺激和反应中,参与者无法仅将与任务相关的系统调整到当前试验。重要的是,尽管这些复杂的关系在词汇和决策水平过程方面具有理论重要性,但这些复杂性也强化了基思·雷纳对阅读过程中在线眼动追踪测量的强调,因为这是了解阅读过程中单词水平过程的最直接窗口。

相似文献

1
Dynamic adjustment of lexical processing in the lexical decision task: Cross-trial sequence effects.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016 Oct 26:1-10. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1240814.
2
Lexical access versus lexical decision processes for auditory, visual, and audiovisual items: Insights from behavioral and neural measures.
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 3;137:107305. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107305. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
3
Brain activation for lexical decision and reading aloud: two sides of the same coin?
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Mar;19(3):433-44. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.433.
4
Lateralized and Region-Specific Thalamic Processing of Lexical Status during Reading Aloud.
J Neurosci. 2022 Apr 13;42(15):3228-3240. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1332-21.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Early Brain Sensitivity to Word Frequency and Lexicality During Reading Aloud and Implicit Reading.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 11;10:830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00830. eCollection 2019.
6
The Generality of Dynamic Adjustments in Decision Processes across Trials and Tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1917-1924. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1359-8.
8
Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
9
The relationship between reading ability and lateralized lexical decision.
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):507-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.001.
10
Lexical and phonological processes in dyslexic readers: evidence from a visual lexical decision task.
Dyslexia. 2014 Feb;20(1):38-53. doi: 10.1002/dys.1461. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
Additive Effects of Item-Specific and Congruency Sequence Effects in the Vocal Stroop Task.
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 24;10:860. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00860. eCollection 2019.
3
The Generality of Dynamic Adjustments in Decision Processes across Trials and Tasks.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1917-1924. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1359-8.
4
Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):480-492. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0666-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.
Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):480-492. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0666-z.
2
To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data.
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 7;6:1171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171. eCollection 2015.
3
Interactive effects of working memory and trial history on Stroop interference in cognitively healthy aging.
Psychol Aging. 2015 Mar;30(1):1-8. doi: 10.1037/pag0000012. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.
6
Reading aloud: does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Jul;39(4):1321-5. doi: 10.1037/a0031673.
7
Additive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality: the influence of trial history and data transformations.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1563-71. doi: 10.1037/a0032186. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
8
Exploring the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency: the influence of local and list-wide prime relatedness.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(1):91-107. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.698628. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
9
Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):898-914. doi: 10.1037/a0029180. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
10
How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):1117-28. doi: 10.1037/a0026948.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验