Suppr超能文献

重新审视试验历史对加性效应和交互效应的调节作用。

Modulation of additive and interactive effects by trial history revisited.

作者信息

Masson Michael E J, Rabe Maximilian M, Kliegl Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Room A234, Cornett Building, P.O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24-25, 14476, Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2017 Apr;45(3):480-492. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0666-z.

Abstract

Masson and Kliegl (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 898-914, 2013) reported evidence that the nature of the target stimulus on the previous trial of a lexical decision task modulates the effects of independent variables on the current trial, including additive versus interactive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality. In contrast, recent reanalyses of previously published data from experiments that, unlike the Masson and Kliegl experiments, did not include semantic priming as a factor, found no evidence for modulation of additive effects of frequency and stimulus quality by trial history (Balota, Aschenbrenner, & Yap, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1563-1571, 2013; O'Malley & Besner, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1400-1411, 2013). We report two experiments that included semantic priming as a factor and that attempted to replicate the modulatory effects found by Masson and Kliegl. In neither experiment was additivity of frequency and stimulus quality modulated by trial history, converging with the findings reported by Balota et al. and O'Malley and Besner. Other modulatory influences of trial history, however, were replicated in the new experiments and reflect potential trial-by-trial alterations in decision processes.

摘要

马森和克莱格(《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,第39卷,第898 - 914页,2013年)报告了相关证据,即在词汇判断任务的前一次试验中目标刺激的性质会调节自变量对当前试验的影响,包括词频和刺激质量的相加效应与交互效应。相比之下,最近对之前发表的实验数据进行的重新分析发现,与马森和克莱格的实验不同,那些实验没有将语义启动作为一个因素,没有证据表明试验历史会调节频率和刺激质量的相加效应(巴洛塔、阿申布伦纳和亚普,《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,第39卷,第1563 - 1571页,2013年;奥马利和贝斯纳,《实验心理学杂志:学习、记忆与认知》,第34卷,第1400 - 1411页,2013年)。我们报告了两项实验,这两项实验将语义启动作为一个因素,并试图重复马森和克莱格发现的调节效应。在这两项实验中,频率和刺激质量的相加性均未受到试验历史的调节,这与巴洛塔等人以及奥马利和贝斯纳报告的结果一致。然而,试验历史的其他调节影响在新实验中得到了重复,这反映了决策过程中潜在的逐次试验变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验