Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 Penn Street HSF II, Baltimore, Maryland, 21201.
Medicine Design, Worldwide Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, 610 Main Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139.
J Comput Chem. 2017 Jun 5;38(15):1238-1251. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24522. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
Accurate and rapid estimation of relative binding affinities of ligand-protein complexes is a requirement of computational methods for their effective use in rational ligand design. Of the approaches commonly used, free energy perturbation (FEP) methods are considered one of the most accurate, although they require significant computational resources. Accordingly, it is desirable to have alternative methods of similar accuracy but greater computational efficiency to facilitate ligand design. In the present study relative free energies of binding are estimated for one or two non-hydrogen atom changes in compounds targeting the proteins ACK1 and p38 MAP kinase using three methods. The methods include standard FEP, single-step free energy perturbation (SSFEP) and the site-identification by ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) ligand grid free energy (LGFE) approach. Results show the SSFEP and SILCS LGFE methods to be competitive with or better than the FEP results for the studied systems, with SILCS LGFE giving the best agreement with experimental results. This is supported by additional comparisons with published FEP data on p38 MAP kinase inhibitors. While both the SSFEP and SILCS LGFE approaches require a significant upfront computational investment, they offer a 1000-fold computational savings over FEP for calculating the relative affinities of ligand modifications once those pre-computations are complete. An illustrative example of the potential application of these methods in the context of screening large numbers of transformations is presented. Thus, the SSFEP and SILCS LGFE approaches represent viable alternatives for actively driving ligand design during drug discovery and development. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
准确快速地估计配体-蛋白质复合物的相对结合亲和力是计算方法在合理配体设计中有效应用的要求。在常用的方法中,自由能微扰(FEP)方法被认为是最准确的方法之一,尽管它们需要大量的计算资源。因此,需要具有类似准确性但计算效率更高的替代方法来促进配体设计。在本研究中,使用三种方法估计了针对 ACK1 和 p38 MAP 激酶蛋白的化合物中的一个或两个非氢原子变化的相对结合自由能。这些方法包括标准 FEP、单步自由能微扰(SSFEP)和通过配体竞争饱和(SILCS)配体网格自由能(LGFE)方法鉴定位点。结果表明,SSFEP 和 SILCS LGFE 方法对于所研究的系统与 FEP 结果具有竞争力或优于 FEP 结果,SILCS LGFE 与实验结果的一致性最好。这得到了与已发表的 p38 MAP 激酶抑制剂 FEP 数据的额外比较的支持。虽然 SSFEP 和 SILCS LGFE 方法都需要大量的前期计算投资,但与 FEP 相比,在完成这些预计算后,它们在计算配体修饰的相对亲和力方面具有 1000 倍的计算节省。提出了一个在大规模转化筛选背景下这些方法潜在应用的说明性示例。因此,SSFEP 和 SILCS LGFE 方法代表了在药物发现和开发过程中积极驱动配体设计的可行替代方案。