• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两周等待转诊系统对结直肠癌检测及死亡率的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析方案

The effect of the 2-week wait referral system on the detection of and mortality from colorectal cancer: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Mozdiak Ella, Tsertsvadze Alexander, McFarlane Michael, Widlak Monika, Tabuso Maria, Dunlop Amber, Arasaradnam Ramesh

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 26;5(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0358-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-016-0358-6
PMID:27784334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5081696/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer represents the fourth most common cancer in England and Wales; survival is high for early stage disease but declines sharply with advanced stage. UK figures suggest that cancer survival rates are lower than those of other Western European countries. Current 5-year survival is around 50 %. A rapid access strategy was introduced through the Department of Health in 2000. This 2-week wait (TWW) referral pathway was devised to streamline referral for suspected cancer, allow diagnosis at an earlier stage, reduce cancer survival inequality and reduce cancer-related mortality. However, only around half of patients with colorectal cancer have symptoms that fit the TWW criteria plus there is a fourfold difference in referral rates across England and Wales. High-quality evidence of TWW outcome measures for colorectal cancer is lacking. This systematic review will collate and evaluate the latest evidence on colorectal cancer detection rate, stage at diagnosis and mortality.

METHODS

English-language publications from 2000 reporting outcomes on the TWW referral system for suspected colorectal cancer will be eligible for inclusion. Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE via PubMed, NHS Evidence, Trip and the British Library Catalogue databases will be searched. Two paired reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts and full text for eligibility, then extract data and assess for bias using standardised formats. They will hand review reference lists of eligible articles. Disagreement will be resolved via third party adjudication. Summary effect measures for post-referral diagnosis and mortality rates will be calculated and expressed as relative risk, hazard rate ratio or risk difference with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals. Where possible summary effect measures will be pooled, heterogeneity and its extent for pooled estimates will be assessed via visual inspection of forest plots and explored via sub-group analysis.

DISCUSSION

In this systematic review, we aim to summarise the relevant evidence on cancer detection rate, cancer stage at diagnosis and disease-related mortality rates for patients with suspected colorectal cancer investigated through the TWW referral system in England and Wales. We will highlight gaps in the evidence and provide a better understanding of whether it is meeting its desired effect.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016037368.

摘要

背景

在英格兰和威尔士,结直肠癌是第四大常见癌症;早期疾病的生存率较高,但随着病情进展会急剧下降。英国的数据表明,癌症生存率低于其他西欧国家。目前的5年生存率约为50%。2000年,卫生部推出了一项快速通道策略。这条两周等待期(TWW)转诊途径旨在简化疑似癌症的转诊流程,实现更早诊断,减少癌症生存率的不平等,并降低癌症相关死亡率。然而,只有约一半的结直肠癌患者有符合两周等待期标准的症状,而且英格兰和威尔士各地的转诊率相差四倍。缺乏关于结直肠癌两周等待期结果指标的高质量证据。本系统评价将整理和评估有关结直肠癌检出率、诊断时分期和死亡率的最新证据。

方法

2000年以来报告疑似结直肠癌两周等待期转诊系统结果的英文出版物将符合纳入标准。将检索Cochrane、EMBASE、通过PubMed检索的MEDLINE、NHS证据库、Trip数据库和大英图书馆目录数据库。两名配对的评审员将独立筛选所有标题/摘要和全文以确定是否符合纳入标准,然后提取数据并使用标准化格式评估偏倚。他们将人工查阅符合条件文章的参考文献列表。分歧将通过第三方裁决解决。将计算转诊后诊断和死亡率的汇总效应量,并表示为相对风险、风险比或风险差以及相应的95%置信区间。如有可能,将汇总汇总效应量,通过森林图的视觉检查评估汇总估计的异质性及其程度,并通过亚组分析进行探讨。

讨论

在本系统评价中,我们旨在总结通过英格兰和威尔士的两周等待期转诊系统调查的疑似结直肠癌患者的癌症检出率、诊断时癌症分期和疾病相关死亡率的相关证据。我们将突出证据中的差距,并更好地了解该系统是否达到了预期效果。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42016037368。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d905/5081696/9011dfc65af2/13643_2016_358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d905/5081696/9011dfc65af2/13643_2016_358_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d905/5081696/9011dfc65af2/13643_2016_358_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of the 2-week wait referral system on the detection of and mortality from colorectal cancer: protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.两周等待转诊系统对结直肠癌检测及死亡率的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 26;5(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0358-6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
4
Effectiveness of physical activity promotion and exercise referral in primary care: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.促进身体活动和运动推荐在初级保健中的效果:系统评价和随机对照试验荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 5;8(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1198-y.
5
Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.林奇综合征相关子宫内膜癌检测策略的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jun;25(42):1-216. doi: 10.3310/hta25420.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
7
Clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pT4 stage II colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair status: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.错配修复缺陷状态的pT4期II期结直肠癌辅助化疗的临床疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20693. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020693.
8
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
The effect of exposure to long working hours on stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.长时间工作暴露对中风的影响:来自世卫组织/国际劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105746. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Straight-to-Test Pathway in Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT)-Negative Patients: A Cost-Effective Approach.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)阴性患者的直接检测途径:一种具有成本效益的方法。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73464. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73464. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
The justification of non-obstetric ultrasound referrals: A safe and effective practice.非产科超声检查转诊的合理性:一种安全有效的做法。
Ultrasound. 2022 Feb;30(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/1742271X211005510. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
3
Accuracy of faecal immunochemical testing in patients with symptomatic colorectal cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid diagnostic pathways for suspected colorectal cancer: views of primary and secondary care clinicians on challenges and their potential solutions.疑似结直肠癌的快速诊断途径:基层和二级医疗机构临床医生对挑战及其潜在解决方案的看法
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 22;5(10):e008577. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008577.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
3
Colorectal cancer.
有症状的结直肠癌患者粪便免疫化学检测的准确性
BJS Open. 2020 Sep 18;4(6):1180-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50346.
4
Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in symptomatic patients: what are we missing?有症状患者的粪便免疫化学检测(FIT):我们遗漏了什么?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101174. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
The two-week wait - a qualitative analysis of suspected head and neck cancer referrals.两周等待期——对头颈部癌症疑似转诊病例的定性分析
Br Dent J. 2018 Jul 27;225(2):159-163. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.528.
结直肠癌
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f3172. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3172.
4
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
5
Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.全科医疗中结直肠癌转诊指南使用的差异
Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9(8):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01201.x.
6
The effects of the Two-Week Rule on NHS colorectal cancer diagnostic services: a systematic literature review.“两周规则”对英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)结直肠癌诊断服务的影响:一项系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 3;6:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-43.
7
How has the 'two-week wait' rule affected the presentation of colorectal cancer?“两周等待”规则对结直肠癌的就诊情况有何影响?
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):450-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00821.x.
8
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.通过一种简单的图形检验检测荟萃分析中的偏倚。
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
9
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.临床试验中的荟萃分析。
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.