Suppr超能文献

全科医疗中结直肠癌转诊指南使用的差异

Inter general practice variability in use of referral guidelines for colorectal cancer.

作者信息

John S K P, Jones O M, Horseman N, Thomas P, Howell R D, Fozard J B J

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2007 Oct;9(8):731-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01201.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Two-Week Wait (TWW) referral system for suspected colorectal cancers has a low yield. To examine this, we assessed the referral pattern of general practices within four primary care trusts and looked at the variability of yield of colorectal cancer amongst all TWW referrals and assessed the reasons for variability.

METHOD

A prospectively collected database of all colorectal cancers was examined for new cases diagnosed in the 12 months from April 1st 2004. Patients were cross-referenced via general practitioner (GP) codes to identify the referral origin. Reasons for the variability in referral patterns from each general practice were assessed in relation to TWW referrals, population demographics and through postal questionnaire of GPs.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were referred from 49 general practices. Whilst there was a positive correlation between the number of TWW referrals and colorectal cancer per 1000-practice population (P = 0.001; Spearman correlation coefficient r(s=0.447,) two-tailed), there was a big discrepancy between referrals and cancer diagnosed in many general practices. Twenty-six general practices (53%) had no colorectal cancer diagnosed via the TWW route and these practices had significantly lower utilization of the TWW referral pathway. In the postal survey, 22% of GPs were unaware of TWW clinics or colorectal cancer referral guidelines and only 8% of GPs knew the number of referral criteria.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates wide variability within primary care, in the appropriate use of colorectal cancer referral guidelines. General practices should be targeted for education.

摘要

目的

疑似结直肠癌的两周等待(TWW)转诊系统的产出率较低。为对此进行研究,我们评估了四个基层医疗信托机构内全科医疗的转诊模式,观察了所有TWW转诊中结直肠癌的产出率差异,并评估了差异的原因。

方法

对前瞻性收集的所有结直肠癌数据库进行检查,以确定2004年4月1日起12个月内诊断出的新病例。通过全科医生(GP)编码对患者进行交叉比对,以确定转诊来源。针对每个全科医疗转诊模式的差异原因,结合TWW转诊、人口统计学数据并通过对全科医生的邮政问卷调查进行评估。

结果

共有175例被诊断为结直肠癌的患者来自49个全科医疗。虽然TWW转诊数量与每1000名执业人口中的结直肠癌病例数之间存在正相关(P = 0.001;Spearman相关系数r(s)=0.447,双侧),但许多全科医疗的转诊与诊断出的癌症之间存在很大差异。26个全科医疗(53%)没有通过TWW途径诊断出结直肠癌,这些全科医疗对TWW转诊途径的利用率显著较低。在邮政调查中,22%的全科医生不知道TWW诊所或结直肠癌转诊指南,只有8%的全科医生知道转诊标准的数量。

结论

本研究表明,在基层医疗中,结直肠癌转诊指南的合理使用存在很大差异。应针对全科医疗进行教育。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验