Suppr超能文献

鉴别头颈部癌症复发肿瘤与治疗后改变:扩散加权磁共振成像能否解决这一长期难题?

Differentiating recurrent tumours from post-treatment changes in head and neck cancers: does diffusion-weighted MRI solve the eternal dilemma?

作者信息

Vaid S, Chandorkar A, Atre A, Shah D, Vaid N

机构信息

Head and Neck Imaging Division, Star Imaging and Research Center, Connaught Place, Bund Garden Road, Pune 411001, India.

Head and Neck Imaging Division, Star Imaging and Research Center, Connaught Place, Bund Garden Road, Pune 411001, India.

出版信息

Clin Radiol. 2017 Jan;72(1):74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.019. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating post-treatment changes from tumour recurrence in head and neck cancers and to establish a threshold apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to differentiate the two conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of 80 treated head and neck cancer patients. The patient cohort consisted of a wide spectrum of head and neck sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, hypopharynx, paranasal sinuses, orbits, salivary glands, and infra-temporal fossa. Qualitative analysis of the diffusion images and quantitative analysis of the corresponding ADC maps was performed and the data were correlated with histopathological findings and clinical examinations.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of recurrent tumours in the present cohort was 0. 932±0.19×10 mm/s and the mean ADC value of lesions representing post-treatment changes was 1.394±0.32×10 mm/s. A threshold ADC value of 1.2×10mm/s used to differentiate post-treatment changes from recurrent head and neck cancers showed the highest combined sensitivity of 90.13%, specificity of 82.5%, accuracy of 86.4%, positive predictive value of 84.4%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, and mean kappa measurement of agreement of 72.8.

CONCLUSION

Combined qualitative and quantitative analysis of DWI is a useful non-invasive technique to differentiate recurrent head and neck malignancies from post-treatment changes using a threshold ADC value.

摘要

目的

评估扩散加权成像(DWI)在鉴别头颈部癌治疗后改变与肿瘤复发方面的效用,并确定一个区分这两种情况的表观扩散系数(ADC)阈值。

材料与方法

这是一项对80例接受治疗的头颈部癌患者的前瞻性研究。患者队列包括广泛的头颈部部位,如口腔、口咽、喉、下咽、鼻窦、眼眶、唾液腺和颞下窝。对扩散图像进行定性分析,并对相应的ADC图进行定量分析,数据与组织病理学结果和临床检查相关联。

结果

本队列中复发肿瘤的平均ADC值为0.932±0.19×10⁻³mm²/s,代表治疗后改变的病变的平均ADC值为1.394±0.32×10⁻³mm²/s。用于区分头颈部癌治疗后改变与复发的ADC阈值为1.2×10⁻³mm²/s,其联合敏感度最高,为90.13%,特异度为82.5%,准确度为86.4%,阳性预测值为84.4%,阴性预测值为88.9%,平均kappa一致性测量值为72.8。

结论

DWI的定性和定量分析相结合是一种有用的非侵入性技术,可利用ADC阈值区分头颈部复发性恶性肿瘤与治疗后改变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验