Thomas R, Flindtgaard M, Skriver K, Geertsen S S, Christiansen L, Korsgaard Johnsen L, Busk D V P, Bojsen-Møller E, Madsen M J, Ritz C, Roig M, Lundbye-Jensen J
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Centre for Team Sport & Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Department of Neuroscience & Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Nov;27(11):1523-1532. doi: 10.1111/sms.12791. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
A single bout of high-intensity exercise can augment off-line gains in skills acquired during motor practice. It is currently unknown if the type of physical exercise influences the effect on motor skill consolidation. This study investigated the effect of three types of high-intensity exercise following visuomotor skill acquisition on the retention of motor memory in 40 young (25.3 ±3.6 years), able-bodied male participants randomly assigned to one of four groups either performing strength training (STR), circuit training (CT), indoor hockey (HOC) or rest (CON). Retention tests of the motor skill were performed 1 (R1h) and 24 h (R1d) post acquisition. For all exercise groups, mean motor performance scores decreased at R1h compared to post acquisition (POST) level; STR (P = 0.018), CT (P = 0.02), HOC (P = 0.014) and performance scores decreased for CT compared to CON (P = 0.049). Mean performance scores increased from POST to R1d for all exercise groups; STR (P = 0.010), CT (P = 0.020), HOC (P = 0.007) while performance scores for CON decreased (P = 0.043). Changes in motor performance were thus greater for STR (P = 0.006), CT (P < 0.001) and HOC (P < 0.001) compared to CON from POST to R1d. The results demonstrate that high-intensity, acute exercise can lead to a decrease in motor performance assessed shortly after motor skill practice (R1h), but enhances offline effects promoting long-term retention (R1d). Given that different exercise modalities produced similar positive off-line effects on motor memory, we conclude that exercise-induced effects beneficial to consolidation appear to depend primarily on the physiological stimulus rather than type of exercise and movements employed.
单次高强度运动可以增强在运动练习期间获得技能的离线收益。目前尚不清楚体育锻炼的类型是否会影响对运动技能巩固的效果。本研究调查了在视觉运动技能习得后,三种类型的高强度运动对40名年轻(25.3±3.6岁)、身体健全的男性参与者运动记忆保持的影响,这些参与者被随机分配到四组之一,分别进行力量训练(STR)、循环训练(CT)、室内曲棍球(HOC)或休息(CON)。在习得后1小时(R1h)和24小时(R1d)进行运动技能的保持测试。对于所有运动组,与习得后(POST)水平相比,R1h时的平均运动表现得分均下降;STR组(P = 0.018)、CT组(P = 0.02)、HOC组(P = 0.014),且CT组与CON组相比表现得分下降(P = 0.049)。所有运动组的平均表现得分从POST到R1d均有所增加;STR组(P = 0.010)、CT组(P = 0.020)、HOC组(P = 0.007),而CON组的表现得分下降(P = 0.043)。因此,与CON组相比,从POST到R1d,STR组(P = 0.006)、CT组(P < 0.001)和HOC组(P < 0.001)的运动表现变化更大。结果表明,高强度的急性运动可导致在运动技能练习后不久(R1h)评估的运动表现下降,但可增强促进长期保持的离线效应(R1d)。鉴于不同的运动方式对运动记忆产生了相似的积极离线效应,我们得出结论,运动诱导的有利于巩固的效应似乎主要取决于生理刺激,而非运动类型和所采用的动作。