James J E, Ricciardelli L A, Rogers P, Hunter C E
Department of Psychology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia.
J Speech Hear Res. 1989 Sep;32(3):604-10. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3203.604.
Relatively few attempts have been made to systematically examine the processes responsible for the ameliorative effects of response-contingent stimulation (RCS) on stuttering. It was hypothesized that the reductions in stuttering that frequently accompany RCS are the result of the stutterer being encouraged to access extant fluent speech that may not be fully evident during "contingency-free" (CF) conditions. A preliminary analysis of the hypothesis was conducted by monitoring RCS and CF stuttering frequency and speaking rate in 20 adult stutterers before, during, and after a program of fluency training. Subjects were divided into "high" and "low" responders on the basis of their baseline response to the RCS procedure of time-out from speaking, after which they participated in a 32-hour program of fluency training aimed at minimizing stuttering. After showing a degree of relapse during a subsequent 6-mon follow-up, high and low responders were found to be equally affected by time-out. This result contrasted the differential response shown by the two groups during the baseline phase, and is consistent with the hypothesis that improvements in fluency during RCS may occur when stutterers access extant fluent speech that is not otherwise being fully utilized.
相对而言,很少有人尝试系统地研究反应性刺激(RCS)对口吃产生改善效果的过程。据推测,RCS经常伴随的口吃减少是口吃者被鼓励使用现存的流畅言语的结果,而这些流畅言语在“无应急情况”(CF)条件下可能并不完全明显。通过监测20名成年口吃者在流畅性训练计划之前、期间和之后的RCS和CF口吃频率及说话速率,对该假设进行了初步分析。根据他们对说话暂停的RCS程序的基线反应,将受试者分为“高”和“低”反应者,之后他们参加了一个为期32小时的流畅性训练计划,旨在尽量减少口吃。在随后6个月的随访中出现一定程度的复发后,发现高反应者和低反应者受说话暂停的影响相同。这一结果与两组在基线阶段表现出的不同反应形成对比,并且与以下假设一致:当口吃者使用未被充分利用的现存流畅言语时,RCS期间的流畅性可能会得到改善。