• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进生物多样性、生计和粮食安全的农业方法。

Farming Approaches for Greater Biodiversity, Livelihoods, and Food Security.

机构信息

Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural (IRNAD), Sede Andina, Universidad Nacional de Río Negro (UNRN) and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Mitre 630, PC 8400, San Carlos de Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina.

World Agroforestry Centre, United Nations Avenue, Nigiri, PC 00100, Nairobi, Kenya.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan;32(1):68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001
PMID:27793463
Abstract

Scientists and policy-makers globally are calling for alternative approaches to conventional intensification of agriculture that enhance ecosystem services provided by biodiversity. The evidence reviewed here suggests that alternative approaches can achieve high crop yields and profits, but the performance of other socioeconomic indicators (as well as long-term trends) is surprisingly poorly documented. Consequently, the implementation of conventional intensification and the discussion of alternative approaches are not based on quantitative evidence of their simultaneous ecological and socioeconomic impacts across the globe. To close this knowledge gap, we propose a participatory assessment framework. Given the impacts of conventional intensification on biodiversity loss and greenhouse gas emissions, such evidence is urgently needed to direct science-policy initiatives, such as the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

摘要

全球的科学家和政策制定者呼吁采取替代方法来加强农业,以提高生物多样性提供的生态系统服务。本文回顾了相关证据,表明替代方法可以实现高作物产量和利润,但其他社会经济指标(以及长期趋势)的表现却鲜少被记录。因此,传统集约化的实施和替代方法的讨论并非基于其对全球生态和社会经济影响的定量证据。为了弥补这一知识差距,我们提出了一个参与式评估框架。鉴于传统集约化对生物多样性丧失和温室气体排放的影响,迫切需要这种证据来指导科学政策倡议,如联合国(UN)2030 年可持续发展议程。

相似文献

1
Farming Approaches for Greater Biodiversity, Livelihoods, and Food Security.促进生物多样性、生计和粮食安全的农业方法。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Jan;32(1):68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
2
Policies for Ecological Intensification of Crop Production.作物生产的生态强化政策。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Apr;34(4):282-286. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world.在不断变化的世界中,通过生态集约化和多样化方法来维持生物多样性、生态系统服务和粮食生产。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2020 Sep 8;4(2):229-240. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20190205.
4
Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice.生态强化:弥合科学与实践之间的差距。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb;34(2):154-166. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
5
Think globally, research locally: paradigms and place in agroecological research.全球思考,地方研究:农业生态研究中的范式与地域
Am J Bot. 2014 Oct;101(10):1631-9. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400146. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Relationships among multiple aspects of agriculture's environmental impact and productivity: a meta-analysis to guide sustainable agriculture.农业环境影响和生产力多方面关系的研究:指导可持续农业的荟萃分析。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 May;92(2):716-738. doi: 10.1111/brv.12251. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Sustainable agricultural practices for food security and ecosystem services.保障粮食安全和生态系统服务的可持续农业实践。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(56):84076-84095. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23635-z. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
8
Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China.社会经济因素对生物多样性、生态系统服务和人类福祉的影响:中国江苏 DPSIR 模型的定量应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2014 Aug 15;490:1012-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.071. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
9
Ecological Intensification Through Pesticide Reduction: Weed Control, Weed Biodiversity and Sustainability in Arable Farming.通过减少农药实现生态集约化:耕地农业中的杂草控制、杂草生物多样性与可持续性
Environ Manage. 2015 Nov;56(5):1078-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0554-5. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
10
Reframing the Food-Biodiversity Challenge.重新构建食物多样性挑战。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 May;32(5):335-345. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
From Flourish to Nourish: Cultivating Soil Health for Sustainable Floriculture.从繁荣到滋养:培育土壤健康以实现可持续花卉栽培。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;13(21):3055. doi: 10.3390/plants13213055.
2
Complementary effects of pollination and biocontrol services enable ecological intensification in macadamia orchards.授粉和生物防治服务的互补效应促进了澳洲坚果果园的生态集约化。
Ecol Appl. 2024 Dec;34(8):e3049. doi: 10.1002/eap.3049. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
3
Environmental sustainability and ruminant production: A UK veterinary perspective.
环境可持续性与反刍动物生产:英国兽医视角
Vet Rec. 2024 Sep 26;196(1):e4703. doi: 10.1002/vetr.4703.
4
Determinants of melon farmers' adaptation strategies to climate change hazards in south‒south Nigeria.尼日利亚南部瓜农适应气候变化相关灾害的策略的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 29;14(1):17395. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61164-6.
5
Mapping cover crop species in southeastern Michigan using Sentinel-2 satellite data and Google Earth Engine.利用哨兵-2卫星数据和谷歌地球引擎绘制密歇根州东南部的覆盖作物物种分布图。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Aug 17;6:1035502. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1035502. eCollection 2023.
6
Agroecology, technology, and stakeholder awareness: Implementing the UN Food Systems Summit call for action.农业生态学、技术与利益相关者意识:落实联合国粮食系统峰会的行动呼吁。
iScience. 2023 Jul 28;26(9):107510. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107510. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
7
Biodiversity and pollination benefits trade off against profit in an intensive farming system.在集约化农业系统中,生物多样性和传粉效益与利润成反比。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jul 11;120(28):e2212124120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212124120. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
8
Integrating genomics and genome editing for orphan crop improvement: a bridge between orphan crops and modern agriculture system.将基因组学和基因组编辑整合到孤儿作物改良中:孤儿作物与现代农业系统之间的桥梁。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-20. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2022.2146952.
9
Pollinator Deficits, Food Consumption, and Consequences for Human Health: A Modeling Study.传粉者缺失、食物消耗与人类健康的后果:建模研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Dec;130(12):127003. doi: 10.1289/EHP10947. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
10
Endogenous Development Models and Paths Selection of Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Ecological Environment Advantages: A Case Study of Nanshi Village, China.从生态环境优势视角看乡村振兴的内生发展模式与路径选择——以南石村为例
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 22;19(19):11979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911979.