Hastings Katherine G, Eggleston Karen, Boothroyd Derek, Kapphahn Kristopher I, Cullen Mark R, Barry Michele, Palaniappan Latha P
Division of General Medical Disciplines, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 28;6(10):e012201. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012201.
With immigration and minority populations rapidly growing in the USA, it is critical to assess how these populations fare after immigration, and in subsequent generations. Our aim is to compare death rates and cause of death across foreign-born, US-born and country of origin Chinese and Japanese populations.
We analysed all-cause and cause-specific age-standardised mortality rates and trends using 2003-2011 US death record data for Chinese and Japanese decedents aged 25 or older by nativity status and sex, and used the WHO Mortality Database for Hong Kong and Japan decedents in the same years. Characteristics such as age at death, absolute number of deaths by cause and educational attainment were also reported.
We examined a total of 10 458 849 deaths. All-cause mortality was highest in Hong Kong and Japan, intermediate for foreign-born, and lowest for US-born decedents. Improved mortality outcomes and higher educational attainment among foreign-born were observed compared with developed Asia counterparts. Lower rates in US-born decedents were due to decreased cancer and communicable disease mortality rates in the US heart disease mortality was either similar or slightly higher among Chinese-Americans and Japanese-Americans compared with those in developed Asia counterparts.
Mortality advantages in the USA were largely due to improvements in cancer and communicable disease mortality outcomes. Mortality advantages and higher educational attainments for foreign-born populations compared with developed Asia counterparts may suggest selective migration. Findings add to our limited understanding of the racial and environmental contributions to immigrant health disparities.
随着美国移民和少数族裔人口迅速增长,评估这些人群移民后以及在后代中的情况至关重要。我们的目的是比较外国出生、美国出生以及祖籍为中国和日本的人群的死亡率和死因。
我们使用2003 - 2011年美国死亡记录数据,按出生状态和性别分析了25岁及以上中国和日本死者的全因及特定原因年龄标准化死亡率和趋势,并使用了同年香港和日本死者的世界卫生组织死亡率数据库。还报告了死亡年龄、死因绝对死亡数和受教育程度等特征。
我们共检查了10458849例死亡。全因死亡率在香港和日本最高,外国出生者居中,美国出生者最低。与亚洲发达国家的同龄人相比,外国出生者的死亡率有所改善,受教育程度更高。美国出生者死亡率较低是由于美国癌症和传染病死亡率下降,华裔美国人和日裔美国人的心脏病死亡率与亚洲发达国家的同龄人相比相似或略高。
美国的死亡率优势主要归因于癌症和传染病死亡率的改善。与亚洲发达国家的同龄人相比,外国出生人群的死亡率优势和更高的受教育程度可能表明存在选择性移民。这些发现增进了我们对种族和环境对移民健康差异影响的有限理解。