• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)风险计算器在整形外科中的有效性:缺乏输入特异性、结果变异性和不精确的风险计算。

Examining the validity of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator in plastic surgery: lack of input specificity, outcome variability and imprecise risk calculations.

作者信息

Johnson Cassandra, Campwala Insiyah, Gupta Subhas

机构信息

The Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, USA.

出版信息

J Investig Med. 2017 Mar;65(3):722-725. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000224. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1136/jim-2016-000224
PMID:27793973
Abstract

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) created the Surgical Risk Calculator, to allow physicians to offer patients a risk-adjusted 30-day surgical outcome prediction. This tool has not yet been validated in plastic surgery. A retrospective analysis of all plastic surgery-specific complications from a quality assurance database from September 2013 through July 2015 was performed. Patient preoperative risk factors were entered into the ACS Surgical Risk Calculator, and predicted outcomes were compared with actual morbidities. The difference in average predicted complication rate versus the actual rate of complication within this population was examined. Within the study population of patients with complications (n=104), the calculator accurately predicted an above average risk for 20.90% of serious complications. For surgical site infections, the average predicted risk for the study population was 3.30%; this prediction was proven only 24.39% accurate. The actual incidence of any complication within the 4924 patients treated in our plastic surgery practice from September 2013 through June 2015 was 1.89%. The most common plastic surgery complications include seroma, hematoma, dehiscence and flap-related complications. The ACS Risk Calculator does not present rates for these risks. While most frequent outcomes fall into general risk calculator categories, the difference in predicted versus actual complication rates indicates that this tool does not accurately predict outcomes in plastic surgery. The ACS Surgical Risk Calculator is not a valid tool for the field of plastic surgery without further research to develop accurate risk stratification tools.

摘要

美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS - NSQIP)创建了手术风险计算器,以便医生能够为患者提供经风险调整后的30天手术结果预测。该工具尚未在整形手术中得到验证。对2013年9月至2015年7月质量保证数据库中所有整形手术特有的并发症进行了回顾性分析。将患者术前风险因素输入ACS手术风险计算器,并将预测结果与实际发病率进行比较。研究了该人群中平均预测并发症发生率与实际并发症发生率之间的差异。在有并发症的患者研究人群中(n = 104),该计算器准确预测出20.90%的严重并发症风险高于平均水平。对于手术部位感染,该研究人群的平均预测风险为3.30%;这一预测仅被证明24.39%准确。2013年9月至2015年6月在我们整形手术实践中治疗的4924例患者中,任何并发症的实际发生率为1.89%。最常见的整形手术并发症包括血清肿、血肿、伤口裂开和皮瓣相关并发症。ACS风险计算器未给出这些风险的发生率。虽然大多数常见结果属于一般风险计算器类别,但预测并发症发生率与实际发生率之间的差异表明,该工具不能准确预测整形手术的结果。在没有进一步研究以开发准确风险分层工具的情况下,ACS手术风险计算器在整形手术领域不是一个有效的工具。

相似文献

1
Examining the validity of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator in plastic surgery: lack of input specificity, outcome variability and imprecise risk calculations.评估美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)风险计算器在整形外科中的有效性:缺乏输入特异性、结果变异性和不精确的风险计算。
J Investig Med. 2017 Mar;65(3):722-725. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000224. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
2
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-day Complications After Spine Surgery?美国外科医师学院风险计算器能否预测脊柱手术后 30 天的并发症?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 May 1;45(9):621-628. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003340.
3
Predicting Postoperative Complications for Acute Care Surgery Patients Using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator.使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)手术风险计算器预测急性护理手术患者的术后并发症
Am Surg. 2017 Jul 1;83(7):733-738.
4
Can the American College of Surgeons Risk Calculator Predict 30-Day Complications After Cervical Spine Surgery?美国外科医师学会风险计算器能否预测颈椎手术后的30天并发症?
Clin Spine Surg. 2019 Nov;32(9):357-362. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000890.
5
Predicting complication risk in spine surgery: a prospective analysis of a novel risk assessment tool.预测脊柱手术并发症风险:一种新型风险评估工具的前瞻性分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):81-91. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16969. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
6
Predictive performance of the American College of Surgeons universal risk calculator in neurosurgical patients.美国外科医师学院通用风险计算器在神经外科患者中的预测性能。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):942-947. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161377. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
7
Can the American College of Surgeons NSQIP surgical risk calculator identify patients at risk of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction?美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)手术风险计算器能否识别出显微外科乳房重建术后有并发症风险的患者?
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Oct;69(10):1356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Predictive validity of American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Project risk calculator in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery.美国外科医师学院:国家外科质量改进计划风险计算器在接受间隔减瘤手术的卵巢癌患者中的预测有效性。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Oct;31(10):1356-1362. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002772. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
9
Accuracy of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Complications Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy at a National Comprehensive Cancer Center.美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划通用手术风险计算器在预测国家综合癌症中心机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术术后并发症中的准确性。
J Endourol. 2019 May;33(5):383-388. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0093. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Predictive validity of the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar surgery.美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)手术风险计算器在接受腰椎手术的老年患者中的预测效度
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(43):e8416. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008416.

引用本文的文献

1
How surgeons use risk calculators and non-clinical factors for informed consent and shared decision making: A qualitative study.外科医生如何使用风险计算器和非临床因素进行知情同意和共同决策:一项定性研究。
Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):660-667. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.017. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
Effective Communication of Personalized Risks and Patient Preferences During Surgical Informed Consent Using Data Visualization: Qualitative Semistructured Interview Study With Patients After Surgery.在手术知情同意过程中使用数据可视化有效传达个性化风险和患者偏好:术后对患者进行的定性半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 29;9(2):e29118. doi: 10.2196/29118.
3
Evaluating Discrimination of ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Thyroidectomy Patients.
评估 ACS-NSQIP 外科风险计算器在甲状腺切除术患者中的歧视程度。
J Surg Res. 2022 Mar;271:137-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.016. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
4
Performance of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Total Gastrectomy.美国外科医师学院 NSQIP 手术风险计算器在全胃切除术中的表现。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Dec;231(6):650-656. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.09.023. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
5
A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Wound Infection Methods: Predictive Values of the CDC, ASEPSIS, and Southampton Scoring Systems in Evaluating Breast Reconstruction Surgical Site Infections.手术伤口感染方法的比较分析:疾控中心、无菌操作和南安普顿评分系统在评估乳房重建手术部位感染中的预测价值
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 May;27(2):93-99. doi: 10.1177/2292550319826095. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
6
Assessing the Performance of the De Novo Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence Calculator.评估新术后压力性尿失禁计算器的性能。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):23-27. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000717.
7
Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.整形外科学研究中国家外科质量改进计划的范围综述
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2019 Feb;27(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/2292550318800499. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
8
Beyond 30 Days: A Risk Calculator for Longer Term Outcomes of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.30天以上:乳房假体再造长期预后风险计算器
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Dec 12;6(12):e2065. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002065. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Might Doctors Really "Know Best"?: Utilizing Surgeon Intuition to Strengthen Preoperative Surgical Risk Assessment.医生真的“最懂行”吗?:利用外科医生的直觉加强术前手术风险评估
Iowa Orthop J. 2018;38:203-208.
10
The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.国家外科质量改进计划30天挑战:显微外科乳房重建结果报告的可靠性
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Mar 6;6(3):e1643. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001643. eCollection 2018 Mar.