• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些行为改变技术可能有助于水烟吸烟者戒烟?使用改良 Delphi 技术的专家共识。

Which Behavior Change Techniques May Help Waterpipe Smokers to Quit? An Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Technique.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jan 5;20(2):154-160. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw297.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntw297
PMID:27798091
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Waterpipe smoking is addictive and harmful. The determinants of waterpipe smoking may differ from those of cigarette smoking; therefore, behavioral approaches to support quitting may also differ between these two tobacco products. While some evidence exists on effective behavioral change techniques (BCTs) to facilitate cigarette smoking cessation, there is little research on waterpipe smoking cessation.

METHODS

Twenty-four experts were selected from the author lists of peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials on waterpipe smoking cessation. They were invited to two rounds of a consensus development exercise using modified Delphi technique. Experts ranked 55 BCTs categorized further into those that promote; "awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting" (14), "preparation and planning to quit" (29), and "relapse prevention and sustaining an ex-smoker identity" (12) on their potential effectiveness. Kendall's W statistics was used to assess agreement.

RESULTS

Fifteen experts responded in round 1 and 14 completed both rounds. A strong consensus was achieved for BCTs that help in "relapse prevention and sustaining ex-smoker identity" (w = 0.7; p < .001) and a moderate for those that promote "awareness of harms of waterpipe smoking and advantages of quitting" (w = 0.6; p < .001) and "preparation and planning to quit" (w = 0.6; p < .001). Providing information on the consequences of waterpipe smoking and its cessation, assessing readiness and ability to quit, and making people aware of the withdrawal symptoms, were the three highest-ranking BCTs.

CONCLUSION

Based on expert consensus, an inventory of BCTs ordered for their potential effectiveness can be useful for health professionals offering cessation support to waterpipe smokers.

IMPLICATIONS

Waterpipe smoking is addictive, harmful, and gaining global popularity, particularly among youth. An expert consensus on behavior change techniques, likely to be effective in supporting waterpipe smokers to quit, has practice and research implications. Smoking cessation advisors can use these techniques to counsel waterpipe smokers who wish to quit. Behavioral and public health scientists can also use these to develop and evaluate behavioral support interventions for this client group.

摘要

简介

水烟吸烟具有成瘾性和危害性。水烟吸烟的决定因素可能与香烟吸烟不同;因此,支持戒烟的行为方法也可能在这两种烟草产品之间有所不同。虽然有一些关于有效的行为改变技术(BCT)来促进香烟戒烟的证据,但关于水烟戒烟的研究很少。

方法

从水烟戒烟的同行评议随机对照试验的作者名单中选择了 24 名专家。他们被邀请参加两轮使用改良 Delphi 技术的共识发展活动。专家对 55 项 BCT 进行了排名,这些 BCT 进一步分为促进以下方面的 BCT:“水烟吸烟危害和戒烟益处的意识”(14 项)、“戒烟准备和计划”(29 项)和“防止复吸和维持戒烟者身份”(12 项),评估它们的潜在有效性。肯德尔 W 统计用于评估一致性。

结果

在第一轮中,有 15 名专家做出了回应,14 名专家完成了两轮。在“防止复吸和维持戒烟者身份”方面达成了强烈共识(W = 0.7;p <.001),在促进“水烟吸烟危害和戒烟益处的意识”和“戒烟准备和计划”方面达成了中度共识(W = 0.6;p <.001)。提供有关水烟吸烟后果及其戒断的信息、评估戒烟的准备情况和能力,以及让人们了解戒断症状,是排名最高的三项 BCT。

结论

根据专家共识,按潜在有效性对 BCT 进行排序的清单可用于为水烟吸烟者提供戒烟支持的卫生专业人员。

意义

水烟吸烟具有成瘾性、危害性,并且在全球范围内越来越受欢迎,尤其是在年轻人中。关于可能有效支持水烟吸烟者戒烟的行为改变技术的专家共识具有实践和研究意义。戒烟顾问可以使用这些技术来为希望戒烟的水烟吸烟者提供咨询。行为和公共卫生科学家也可以使用这些技术来为这一客户群体开发和评估行为支持干预措施。

相似文献

1
Which Behavior Change Techniques May Help Waterpipe Smokers to Quit? An Expert Consensus Using a Modified Delphi Technique.哪些行为改变技术可能有助于水烟吸烟者戒烟?使用改良 Delphi 技术的专家共识。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Jan 5;20(2):154-160. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw297.
2
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 7;6(6):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub4.
3
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 31;2015(7):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub3.
4
Improving Behavioral Support for Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy: What Are the Barriers to Stopping and Which Behavior Change Techniques Can Influence These? Application of Theoretical Domains Framework.改善妊娠戒烟中的行为支持:戒烟的障碍是什么,以及哪些行为改变技术可以影响这些?理论领域框架的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 17;15(2):359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020359.
5
The efficacy of varenicline in achieving abstinence among waterpipe tobacco smokers - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.伐尼克兰对水烟吸烟者戒烟的疗效——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 11;18(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1761-y.
6
Beliefs and perceptions toward quitting waterpipe smoking among cafe waterpipe tobacco smokers in Bahrain.巴林咖啡馆水烟烟草吸食者戒烟意愿和看法的调查研究
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Nov;15(11):1816-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt064. Epub 2013 May 14.
7
A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers.一项评估运动辅助戒烟(EARS)对弱势吸烟者的临床效果和成本效益的方法和程序的初步随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(4):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta18040.
8
Methods of smoking cessation.戒烟方法。
Med Clin North Am. 1992 Mar;76(2):451-76. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30362-5.
9
Real-World Effectiveness of Smoking Cessation Strategies for Young and Older Adults: Findings From a Nationally Representative Cohort.现实世界中针对年轻和老年成年人的戒烟策略的有效性:来自全国代表性队列的研究结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1560-1568. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz223.
10
Waterpipe tobacco smoking: The critical need for cessation treatment.水烟吸食:戒烟治疗的迫切需求。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 1;153:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the Prioritization of Behavior Change Techniques for Long-Term Stroke Rehabilitation: Delphi Survey Study.确定长期中风康复行为改变技术的优先级:德尔菲调查研究
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Apr 7;14:e59172. doi: 10.2196/59172.
2
Clinical consensus statements on change techniques for gambling treatment: A Delphi study with clinicians.赌博治疗改变技术的临床共识声明:一项针对临床医生的德尔菲研究。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 14;14(1):430-444. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00004. Print 2025 Mar 28.
3
International Expert Consensus on Relevant Health and Functioning Concepts to Assess in Users of Tobacco and Nicotine Products: Delphi Study.
评估烟草和尼古丁产品使用者相关健康与功能概念的国际专家共识:德尔菲研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 2;9:e58614. doi: 10.2196/58614.
4
Tailored Mobile Messaging Intervention for Waterpipe Tobacco Cessation in Young Adults: A Randomized Trial.针对年轻人水烟戒烟的定制移动短信干预:一项随机试验。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Sep;111(9):1686-1695. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306389. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
5
A behaviour change intervention to reduce home exposure to second hand smoke during pregnancy in India and Bangladesh: a theory and evidence-based approach to development.一项旨在减少印度和孟加拉国孕期家庭二手烟暴露的行为改变干预措施:基于理论和证据的发展方法。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00811-5.
6
Preventing and controlling water pipe smoking: a systematic review of management interventions.预防和控制水管吸烟:管理干预措施的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;21(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10306-w.
7
Comprehensive Evaluation System of Occupational Hazard Prevention and Control in Iron and Steel Enterprises Based on A Modified Delphi Technique.基于改进 Delphi 技术的钢铁企业职业病危害防控综合评价体系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 20;17(2):667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020667.
8
Water Pipe (Hookah) Smoking and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.水烟(水烟壶)吸烟与心血管疾病风险:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2019 May 7;139(19):e917-e936. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000671.
9
Delphi study among international expert panel to develop waterpipe-specific health warning labels.德尔菲研究在国际专家小组中开展水烟专用健康警示标签。
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):159-167. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054718. Epub 2019 Jan 29.