Capogna G, Celleno D, Sebastiani M, Costantino P, Reggio S
Minerva Anestesiol. 1989 Jan-Feb;55(1-2):33-8.
A double blind comparison between morphine and buprenorphine was performed in 20 patients using a new demand and continuous infusion analgesic system to provide analgesia after cesarean section. The patients were randomized in two equal groups to receive either morphine 1 mg/h or buprenorphine 0.03 mg/h. The PCA system was set to deliver bolus of either morphine 1 mg or buprenorphine 0.03 mg, with a lockout interval of 10 and 15 min respectively. A loading dose of morphine 5 mg or buprenorphine 0.15 mg was given if necessary. The quality of analgesia, assessed by a visual analogue and a subjective scale was good with both drugs. No difference in side effects between the groups was observed. The mean potency ratio between buprenorphine and morphine was 32:1. Patients receiving buprenorphine showed a more prolonged analgesia and a significant improvement of sedation score.
在20例患者中,使用一种新型的按需和持续输注镇痛系统,对吗啡和丁丙诺啡进行了双盲比较,以在剖宫产术后提供镇痛。患者被随机分为两组,每组人数相等,分别接受1毫克/小时的吗啡或0.03毫克/小时的丁丙诺啡。PCA系统设置为分别给予1毫克吗啡或0.03毫克丁丙诺啡的推注量,锁定间隔分别为10分钟和15分钟。必要时给予5毫克吗啡或0.15毫克丁丙诺啡的负荷剂量。通过视觉模拟评分和主观量表评估的镇痛质量,两种药物均良好。两组之间未观察到副作用差异。丁丙诺啡与吗啡之间的平均效价比为32:1。接受丁丙诺啡的患者镇痛时间更长,镇静评分有显著改善。