Peli Angelo, Pietra Marco, Giacometti Federica, Mazzi Antonella, Scacco Gianluca, Serraino Andrea, Scagliarini Lorenzo
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna , Ozzano Emilia (BO).
Veterinary practitioner , Modena.
Ital J Food Saf. 2016 Mar 3;5(1):5832. doi: 10.4081/ijfs.2016.5832. eCollection 2016 Jan 18.
The final results of a survey on welfare of dairy cows in 7 Italian Regions are presented. The study has been performed on 943 farms in southern and central Italy to highlight critical and strong points concerning animal welfare in dairy systems, by using direct and indirect criteria. To assess animal welfare, a checklist based on 303 parameters has been used; indirect criteria have been organised in 5 general areas concerning , , , , ; other resource-based criteria were considered in 5 specific areas for the different productive categories (lactating cows, dry cows, pregnant heifers, cows comeback, calves up to 8 weeks and calves between 8 weeks and 6 months); finally, an section focused on animal based criteria. Parameters have been valued as or on the basis of the current lesgislation on animal welfare, and in the other cases by the use of a semi-quantitative scale such as , , or referring to scientific literature and reports by the Animal Health and Animal Welfare panel of the European Food Safety Authority. Among the 249 examined parameters (54 criteria have been valued as ), 15 showed a failure prevalence inferior to 1%; for the remaining parameters, the overall non-compliance prevalence on the whole sample ranged from a maximum of 67% to a minimum of 2%, showing an inverse proportionality correlation with the herd size. One hundred and ten parameters were judged as (96) or with the rules in force (14) in more than 10% of the examined herds. The most common non-compliance aspects detected in the different areas concern calves management, staff training and prophylaxis programmes; staff training levels were inversely related to failure prevalences in almost all areas. The combination of direct and indirect criteria has allowed to fully embrace recommendations on the use of animal based measures for the assessment of animal welfare, as accepted into the strategic Plan for the EU animal welfare for 2012-2015.
本文展示了对意大利7个地区奶牛福利调查的最终结果。该研究在意大利南部和中部的943个农场开展,通过直接和间接标准,突出奶牛养殖系统中动物福利的关键点和优势点。为评估动物福利,使用了一个基于303个参数的清单;间接标准被归纳为5个总体领域,涉及[此处原文缺失相关内容];针对不同生产类别(泌乳奶牛、干奶牛、怀孕小母牛、恢复期母牛、8周龄以内犊牛以及8周龄至6月龄犊牛),在5个特定领域考虑了其他基于资源的标准;最后,有一个部分聚焦于基于动物的标准。根据当前动物福利法规,参数被评定为[此处原文缺失相关内容]或[此处原文缺失相关内容],在其他情况下,则使用半定量量表,如[此处原文缺失相关内容]、[此处原文缺失相关内容]、[此处原文缺失相关内容]或[此处原文缺失相关内容],参考科学文献以及欧洲食品安全局动物健康与动物福利专家组的报告。在249个被检查的参数中(54个标准被评定为[此处原文缺失相关内容]),15个显示出低于1%的不合格率;对于其余参数,整个样本的总体不达标率最高为67%,最低为2%,与畜群规模呈反比关系。110个参数在超过10%的被检查畜群中被判定为[此处原文缺失相关内容](96个)或不符合现行规定(14个)。在不同领域检测到的最常见不达标方面涉及犊牛管理、员工培训和预防计划;员工培训水平在几乎所有领域都与不合格率呈反比关系。直接和间接标准的结合使得能够充分采纳关于使用基于动物的措施评估动物福利的建议,这一建议已被纳入2012 - 2015年欧盟动物福利战略计划。