Bartelsman Menne, de Vries Henry J C, Schim van der Loeff Maarten F, Sabajo Leslie O A, van der Helm Jannie J
Department of Infectious Diseases, STI Outpatient Clinic, Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD Amsterdam), Weesperplein 1, 1018, XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Center for Infection and Immunology Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 3;16(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1946-8.
Point-of-care (POC) tests are an important strategy to address the epidemic of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The leucocyte esterase test (LET) can be used as a POC test for chlamydia. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the LET to detect urogenital chlamydia among men at STI clinics in Paramaribo, Suriname and Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Recruitment of patients took place in 2008-2010 in Suriname and in 2009-2010 in the Netherlands. Urine of patients was examined with the LET. The reference test was a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).
We included 412 patients in Suriname and 645 in the Netherlands. Prevalence of chlamydia in Suriname and the Netherlands was respectively 22.8 and 13.6 %. The sensitivity of the LET was 92.6 % (95 % CI = 85.3-97.0) and 77.3 % (95 % CI = 67.1-85.5) respectively, the specificity was 38.1 % (95 % CI = 32.7-43.6 %) and 58.1 % (95 % CI = 53.9-62.3) respectively. The positive predictive value was 30.6 % (95 % CI = 27.3-36.4) and 22.6 % (95 % CI = 18.0-27.7) respectively and the negative predictive value was 94.5 % (95 % CI = 89.1-97.8) and 94.2 % (95 % CI = 91.1-96.4) respectively. The kappa was respectively 0.179 and 0.176.
To diagnose urogenital chlamydia in men the LET performs poorly. It has a high negative but low positive predictive value. If the LET result is negative, chlamydia is accurately excluded, yet a positive result has a low predictive value. Whether the advantages of direct management based on LET outweigh the disadvantages of overtreatment is a subject for further studies.
即时检验(POC)是应对性传播感染(STIs)流行的一项重要策略。白细胞酯酶检测(LET)可作为衣原体的即时检验方法。本研究的目的是确定在苏里南帕拉马里博和荷兰阿姆斯特丹的性传播感染诊所中,LET检测男性泌尿生殖系统衣原体的诊断准确性。
2008 - 2010年在苏里南招募患者,2009 - 2010年在荷兰招募患者。用LET检测患者尿液。参考检测方法为核酸扩增检测(NAAT)。
我们纳入了412名苏里南患者和645名荷兰患者。苏里南和荷兰衣原体的患病率分别为22.8%和13.6%。LET的敏感性分别为92.6%(95%置信区间 = 85.3 - 97.0)和77.3%(95%置信区间 = 67.1 - 85.5),特异性分别为38.1%(95%置信区间 = 32.7 - 43.6%)和58.1%(95%置信区间 = 53.9 - 62.3)。阳性预测值分别为30.6%(95%置信区间 = 27.3 - 36.4)和22.6%(95%置信区间 = 18.0 - 27.7),阴性预测值分别为94.5%(95%置信区间 = 89.1 - 97.8)和94.2%(95%置信区间 = 91.1 - 96.4)。kappa值分别为0.179和0.176。
对于男性泌尿生殖系统衣原体的诊断,LET表现不佳。它具有较高的阴性预测值,但阳性预测值较低。如果LET结果为阴性,则可准确排除衣原体感染,但阳性结果的预测价值较低。基于LET的直接管理的优势是否超过过度治疗的劣势,是有待进一步研究的课题。