Blome-Eberwein Sigrid, Gogal Christina, Weiss Michael J, Boorse Deborah, Pagella Patrick
From the *Department of LVPG Burn Surgery, †Network Office of Research and Innovation, and ‡Department of Health Systems Research and Innovation, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania.
J Burn Care Res. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):379-387. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000383.
The authors conducted a prospective study of fractional CO2 laser treatment of mature burn scars, comparing objective and subjective scar measurements evaluating at least one treatment and one control scar on the same patient pre- and post treatments. After institutional review board approval, burn survivors with mature blatant burn scars were invited to enter the study. A series of three fractional CO2 laser treatments was performed in an office setting, using topical anesthetic cream, at 40 to 90 mJ, 100 to 150 spots per cm(2). Subjective and objective measurements of scar physiology and appearance were performed before and at least 1 month after the treatment series on both the treated and the control scar. A total of 80 scars, 48 treatment and 32 control scars, were included in the study. Treatment pain score averaged at 4.7/10 during and at 2.4/10 5 minutes after the treatment. All treated scars showed improvement. Objectively measured thickness, sensation, erythema, and pigmentation improved significantly in the treated scars (P = .001, .001, .004, and .001). Elasticity improved, but without statistical significance. Vancouver scar scale assessments by an independent observer improved from 8 to 6; patient self-reported pain and pruritus remained unchanged in both groups. Fractional CO2 laser treatment is a promising entity in the treatment of burn scars. Our study results show significant differences in objective measurements between the treated scars and the untreated control scars over the same time period. In scar treatment studies, the patient/observer and Vancouver scar scales may not be sensitive enough to detect outcome differences.
作者对二氧化碳点阵激光治疗成熟烧伤瘢痕进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较了在同一患者治疗前和治疗后对至少一处治疗瘢痕和一处对照瘢痕进行评估的客观和主观瘢痕测量结果。在获得机构审查委员会批准后,邀请有成熟明显烧伤瘢痕的烧伤幸存者参加该研究。在门诊环境中,使用外用麻醉乳膏,以40至90 mJ、每平方厘米100至150个光斑的参数进行了一系列三次二氧化碳点阵激光治疗。在治疗系列之前以及之后至少1个月,对治疗瘢痕和对照瘢痕进行瘢痕生理和外观的主观和客观测量。该研究共纳入了80处瘢痕,其中48处为治疗瘢痕,32处为对照瘢痕。治疗期间疼痛评分平均为4.7/10,治疗后5分钟为2.4/10。所有治疗瘢痕均有改善。治疗瘢痕在客观测量的厚度、感觉、红斑和色素沉着方面有显著改善(P = .001、.001、.004和.001)。弹性有所改善,但无统计学意义。由独立观察者进行的温哥华瘢痕量表评估从8分提高到了6分;两组患者自我报告的疼痛和瘙痒情况均未改变。二氧化碳点阵激光治疗在烧伤瘢痕治疗中是一种有前景的方法。我们的研究结果显示,在同一时间段内,治疗瘢痕与未治疗的对照瘢痕在客观测量上存在显著差异。在瘢痕治疗研究中,患者/观察者和温哥华瘢痕量表可能不够敏感,无法检测到结果差异。
J Burn Care Res. 2016
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018-9-20
Lasers Surg Med. 2014-10
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021-11
PLoS One. 2025-8-21
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-6-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-26