Peng Weihai, Zhang Xi, Kong Xiangli, Shi Kai
Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun 130021, PR China.
Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun 130021, PR China.
Burns. 2021 Nov;47(7):1469-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
Although we have numerous publications about the effect of fractional CO laser therapy for burn scars, quantitative data about its efficacy and safety are sparse. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of fractional CO laser therapy for the treatment of burn scars. Pertinent studies were identified by a search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to 20 September 2020. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was conducted to combine the results, and a random-effect model was used to pool the results. Publication bias was estimated using Begg and Egger's regression asymmetry test. Twenty articles were included. Our pooled results suggested that fractional CO laser therapy significantly improved the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score (WMD = -3.24, 95%CI: -4.30, -2.18; P < 0.001). Moreover, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS)-patient (WMD = -14.05, 95%CI: -22.44, -5.65; P = 0.001) and Observer (WMD = -6.31, 95%CI: -8.48, -4.15; P < 0.001) also showed significant improvements with the treatment of fractional CO laser therapy. Fractional CO laser significantly reduced scar thickness measured with ultrasonography (WMD = -0.54, 95%CI: -0.97, -0.10; P < 0.001). For other outcomes, including pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, and height of scar, vascularity and relief, laser therapy was associated with significant improvements. However, only the cutometer measure R2 (scar elasticity) (WMD = -0.06, 95%CI: -0.10, -0.01; P = 0.023) was significantly improved with the laser therapy, but cutometer measures R0 (scar firmness) (WMD = 0.03, 95%CI: -0.04, 0.09; P = 0.482) was not. Side effects and complications induced by fractional CO laser were mild and tolerable. Fractional CO laser therapy significantly improved both the signs and symptoms of burn scars. Considering potential limitations, more large-scale, well-designed RCTs are needed to verify our findings.
尽管我们有大量关于剥脱性二氧化碳激光疗法治疗烧伤瘢痕效果的出版物,但关于其疗效和安全性的定量数据却很少。本荟萃分析的目的是评估剥脱性二氧化碳激光疗法治疗烧伤瘢痕的疗效和安全性。通过检索截至2020年9月20日的PubMed、Embase和科学网确定相关研究。采用加权平均差(WMD)合并结果,并使用随机效应模型汇总结果。使用Begg和Egger回归不对称检验估计发表偏倚。纳入了20篇文章。我们的汇总结果表明,剥脱性二氧化碳激光疗法显著改善了温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分(WMD = -3.24,95%CI:-4.30,-2.18;P < 0.001)。此外,患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)-患者(WMD = -14.05,95%CI:-22.44,-5.65;P = 0.001)和观察者(WMD = -6.31,95%CI:-8.48,-4.15;P < 0.001)在剥脱性二氧化碳激光疗法治疗后也显示出显著改善。剥脱性二氧化碳激光显著降低了超声测量的瘢痕厚度(WMD = -0.54,95%CI:-0.97,-0.10;P < 0.001)。对于其他结果,包括色素沉着、血管分布、柔韧性和瘢痕高度、血管分布和缓解情况,激光疗法均有显著改善。然而,只有皮肤弹性仪测量的R2(瘢痕弹性)(WMD = -0.06,95%CI:-0.10,-0.01;P = 0.023)在激光治疗后有显著改善,而皮肤弹性仪测量的R0(瘢痕硬度)(WMD = 0.03,95%CI:-0.04,0.09;P = 0.482)没有。剥脱性二氧化碳激光引起的副作用和并发症轻微且可耐受。剥脱性二氧化碳激光疗法显著改善了烧伤瘢痕的体征和症状。考虑到潜在的局限性,需要更多大规模、设计良好的随机对照试验来验证我们的发现。