Roelen Corné, Thorsen Sannie, Heymans Martijn, Twisk Jos, Bültmann Ute, Bjørner Jakob
a Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine , University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands.
b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , VU University Medical Center, VU University , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(2):168-175. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1247471. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a prediction model for identifying employees at increased risk of long-term sickness absence (LTSA), by using variables commonly measured in occupational health surveys.
Based on the literature, 15 predictor variables were retrieved from the DAnish National working Environment Survey (DANES) and included in a model predicting incident LTSA (≥4 consecutive weeks) during 1-year follow-up in a sample of 4000 DANES participants. The 15-predictor model was reduced by backward stepwise statistical techniques and then validated in a sample of 2524 DANES participants, not included in the development sample. Identification of employees at increased LTSA risk was investigated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis; the area-under-the-ROC-curve (AUC) reflected discrimination between employees with and without LTSA during follow-up.
The 15-predictor model was reduced to a 9-predictor model including age, gender, education, self-rated health, mental health, prior LTSA, work ability, emotional job demands, and recognition by the management. Discrimination by the 9-predictor model was significant (AUC = 0.68; 95% CI 0.61-0.76), but not practically useful.
A prediction model based on occupational health survey variables identified employees with an increased LTSA risk, but should be further developed into a practically useful tool to predict the risk of LTSA in the general working population. Implications for rehabilitation Long-term sickness absence risk predictions would enable healthcare providers to refer high-risk employees to rehabilitation programs aimed at preventing or reducing work disability. A prediction model based on health survey variables discriminates between employees at high and low risk of long-term sickness absence, but discrimination was not practically useful. Health survey variables provide insufficient information to determine long-term sickness absence risk profiles. There is a need for new variables, based on the knowledge and experience of rehabilitation professionals, to improve long-term sickness absence risk profiles.
本研究的目的是通过使用职业健康调查中常用的变量,开发并验证一个用于识别长期病假(LTSA)风险增加的员工的预测模型。
基于文献,从丹麦国家工作环境调查(DANES)中检索出15个预测变量,并将其纳入一个预测模型,该模型用于预测4000名DANES参与者在1年随访期间的新发LTSA(连续≥4周)情况。通过向后逐步统计技术简化15个预测变量的模型,然后在未纳入开发样本的2524名DANES参与者样本中进行验证。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析研究识别LTSA风险增加的员工;ROC曲线下面积(AUC)反映随访期间有LTSA和无LTSA员工之间的区分度。
15个预测变量的模型简化为一个9个预测变量的模型,包括年龄、性别、教育程度、自我评估健康状况、心理健康、既往LTSA、工作能力、情感工作需求以及管理层认可。9个预测变量模型的区分度显著(AUC = 0.68;95%CI 0.61 - 0.76),但实际应用价值不大。
基于职业健康调查变量的预测模型可识别LTSA风险增加的员工,但应进一步开发成为一个在一般工作人群中预测LTSA风险的实用工具。康复的意义长期病假风险预测将使医疗保健提供者能够将高风险员工转介至旨在预防或减少工作残疾的康复项目。基于健康调查变量的预测模型可区分长期病假风险高和低的员工,但区分度实际应用价值不大。健康调查变量提供的信息不足以确定长期病假风险概况。需要基于康复专业人员的知识和经验的新变量来改善长期病假风险概况。