Population Intervention Measures to Connect Research Findings to Policy.
作者信息
Ahern Jennifer
机构信息
Jennifer Ahern is with the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2152-2153. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303494.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Population Intervention Measures to Connect Research Findings to Policy.将研究成果与政策相联系的人群干预措施。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2152-2153. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303494.
2
Evidence of new innovations: investing in evidence synthesis, generation and translation ensures public health innovations improve population health.新创新的证据：投资于证据综合、生成和转化可确保公共卫生创新改善人群健康。
Perspect Public Health. 2011 May;131(3):103. doi: 10.1177/17579139111310030401.
3
Translational global health: from shortage to science to service.转化性全球健康：从短缺到科学再到服务。
Lancet Glob Health. 2013 Sep;1(3):e134. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70042-1. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
Foundational biomedical informatics research in the clinical and translational science era: a call to action.临床与转化科学时代的基础生物医学信息学研究：行动呼吁。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):615-6. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.005165.
5
The multiple layers of prevention science research.预防科学研究的多个层面。
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jun;28(5):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.02.020.
6
Therapeutics: Boost to translational medicine in Europe.治疗学：欧洲转化医学的推动因素。
Nature. 2013 May 30;497(7451):565. doi: 10.1038/497565c.
7
Translational research in the radiologic sciences.放射科学中的转化研究。
Radiol Technol. 2014 Jan-Feb;85(3):327-9.
8
[Transfer of research findings into medical practice].[将研究成果转化为医学实践]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Nov;74(11):754-61. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1286277. Epub 2011 Oct 19.
9
[Greetings on 125 years with the German Society of Dermatology].[向德国皮肤病学会成立125周年致以问候]
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2014 Nov;12 Suppl 4:3. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12529.
10
Longitudinal thinking.
Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Mar;31(3):177. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2534.
引用本文的文献
1
Improved Air Quality and Asthma Incidence from School Age to Young Adulthood: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study.空气质量改善与青少年时期哮喘发病率：基于人群的前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1432-1440. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202402-200OC.
2
Different effects for different questions: An illustration using short cervix and the risk of preterm birth.不同问题有不同影响：以短宫颈和早产风险为例。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Mar;160(3):842-849. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14372. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
3
Effects of policy-driven hypothetical air pollutant interventions on childhood asthma incidence in southern California.政策驱动的假想空气污染物干预措施对南加州儿童哮喘发病率的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):15883-15888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815678116. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
A Public Health of Consequence: Review of the December 2016 Issue of AJPH.具有重要意义的公共卫生：《美国公共卫生杂志》2016年12月刊述评
Am J Public Health. 2016 Dec;106(12):2091-2092. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303496.
本文引用的文献
1
Predicting the Population Health Impacts of Community Interventions: The Case of Alcohol Outlets and Binge Drinking.预测社区干预对人群健康的影响：以酒类销售点与酗酒为例。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1938-1943. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303425. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
Causal inference and the data-fusion problem.因果推断与数据融合问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7345-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510507113.
3
Defining 'evidence' in public health: a survey of policymakers' uses and preferences.界定公共卫生领域的“证据”：政策制定者的使用情况与偏好调查
Eur J Public Health. 2017 May 1;27(suppl_2):112-117. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv082.
4
Assessing the causal effect of policies: an example using stochastic interventions.评估政策的因果效应：一个使用随机干预的例子。
Int J Biostat. 2013 Nov 19;9(2):161-74. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2013-0014.
5
Estimating the effects of potential public health interventions on population disease burden: a step-by-step illustration of causal inference methods.评估潜在公共卫生干预措施对人群疾病负担的影响：因果推断方法的逐步说明
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 May 1;169(9):1140-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp015. Epub 2009 Mar 6.
6
Population intervention models in causal inference.因果推断中的人群干预模型。
Biometrika. 2008;95(1):35-47. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asm097.
7
Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.为什么我们没有看到更多将健康促进研究转化为实践的案例？重新思考从有效性到实效性的转变。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1261-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261.
Zotero 插件