Ramanauskaite Ausra, Tervonen Tellervo
Department of Dental and Oral Pathology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Lithuania.
Department of Periodontology and Geriatric Dentistry, Unit of Oral Health Sciences, University of OuluFinland.; Medical Research Center Oulu (MRC Oulu), University of Oulu and Oulu University HospitalFinland.
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016 Sep 9;7(3):e12. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2016.7312. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
To study the efficacy of supportive peri-implant therapies in preventing clinical and radiological signs of peri-implantitis and implant loss.
Longitudinal human studies, published between January 1, 2006, and February 1, 2016, were included based on an electronic search using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and complemented by a manual search. Articles were included only if 1) they comprised a group of patients involved in/adhering to regular supportive peri-implant therapies (SPTs) and a control group without such therapies or with poor adherence to them, 2) the protocol of the SPTs was clearly described and 3) the outcome was indicated by means of clinical/radiological changes or implant loss.
After initially identifying a total of 710 titles and abstracts, 12 full text articles were selected for eligibility assessment. Seven studies, three prospective and four retrospective, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this review. The frequency of recall visits varied between the studies from a minimum of one visit every three months to an individually tailored regimen. In all the studies a lack of SPTs or poor adherence to them resulted in significantly higher frequencies of sites with mucosal bleeding, deepened peri-implant pockets or alveolar bone loss. In line with the above, a lack of/poor adherence to SPTs was associated with higher implant loss.
To prevent peri-implantitis, an individually tailored supportive programme based on patient motivation and re-instruction in oral hygiene measures combined with professional implant cleaning seem to be crucial.
研究种植体周围支持性治疗在预防种植体周围炎的临床和影像学表现以及种植体丧失方面的疗效。
纳入2006年1月1日至2016年2月1日期间发表的纵向人体研究,通过使用MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行电子检索,并辅以手工检索。仅当文章满足以下条件时才被纳入:1)文章包含一组接受/坚持定期种植体周围支持性治疗(SPT)的患者和一组未接受此类治疗或依从性差的对照组;2)SPT的方案有清晰描述;3)结果通过临床/影像学变化或种植体丧失来表明。
在初步筛选出总共710篇标题和摘要后,选择了12篇全文文章进行资格评估。七项研究符合本综述的纳入标准,其中三项为前瞻性研究,四项为回顾性研究。各研究中复诊频率各不相同,从每三个月至少复诊一次到个体化定制方案。在所有研究中,缺乏SPT或对其依从性差导致黏膜出血、种植体周围袋加深或牙槽骨丧失的部位频率显著更高。与此一致,缺乏/依从性差与更高的种植体丧失率相关。
为预防种植体周围炎,基于患者积极性、重新指导口腔卫生措施并结合专业种植体清洁的个体化定制支持性方案似乎至关重要。