Mador Brett D, Nathens Avery B, Xiong Wei, Panton O Neely M, Hameed S Morad
Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, 80 Bond St, Donnelly Wing 3-070, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2977-2985. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5316-9. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Choledocholithiasis is commonly treated initially with endoscopic sphincterotomy, followed by cholecystectomy to definitively address the underlying problem of cholelithiasis. While the benefits of early cholecystectomy have been realized in other populations, the preferred timing for this subset of patients is less well established. We performed a large, population-based analysis to determine the frequency, benefits, and practice variance in regard to early cholecystectomy on a provincial level.
Patients undergoing endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by cholecystectomy in British Columbia, Canada, from January 2001 to December 2011 were identified using fee-code billing data. Multiple databases were linked to obtain information on demographics, admissions, procedures, mortality, and census geographic data. Regression analysis was performed for length of stay (LOS) and additional procedures. Outcome data were risk adjusted for age, gender, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and year of procedure. Variability of early cholecystectomy crude rates across census areas was determined using a funnel plot.
There were 4287 eligible patients. Of these, 1905 (44.4%) underwent early cholecystectomy, defined as surgery within 14 days of sphincterotomy. Median interval to cholecystectomy was 2 days for the early cholecystectomy group and 61 days for delayed. There was a significant difference in hospital LOS favoring early cholecystectomy for patients with documented gallstone disease (p < 0.05). Patients initially admitted to a surgical service were more likely to undergo early cholecystectomy (60 vs. 36%, p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups in terms of bile duct injury or mortality. There was wide variability in rates of early cholecystectomy among census areas (range 0-96%) and health regions (range 20-66%) which was not explained by population density or geography.
Early cholecystectomy is the ideal approach to gallstone disease post-sphincterotomy. Despite this, a large amount of clinical variance exists in regard to timing of cholecystectomy which seems to be primarily institution dependent.
胆总管结石通常最初采用内镜括约肌切开术治疗,随后进行胆囊切除术以彻底解决胆石症这一潜在问题。虽然早期胆囊切除术在其他人群中已显示出益处,但对于这部分患者的最佳手术时机尚不太明确。我们进行了一项基于人群的大型分析,以确定省级层面早期胆囊切除术的频率、益处及实践差异。
利用收费编码计费数据,识别出2001年1月至2011年12月在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省接受内镜括约肌切开术并随后进行胆囊切除术的患者。链接多个数据库以获取人口统计学、住院情况、手术、死亡率及人口普查地理数据等信息。对住院时间(LOS)和额外手术进行回归分析。对结局数据按年龄、性别、合并症、社会经济状况及手术年份进行风险调整。使用漏斗图确定普查区域早期胆囊切除术粗率的变异性。
有4287例符合条件的患者。其中,1905例(44.4%)接受了早期胆囊切除术,定义为在括约肌切开术14天内进行手术。早期胆囊切除术组胆囊切除术的中位间隔时间为2天,延迟组为61天。对于有记录的胆石症患者,早期胆囊切除术在住院时间方面有显著优势(p < 0.05)。最初入住外科病房的患者更有可能接受早期胆囊切除术(60%对36%,p < 0.001)。两组在胆管损伤或死亡率方面无差异。普查区域(范围0 - 96%)和健康区域(范围20 - 66%)的早期胆囊切除术率存在很大差异,这不能用人口密度或地理位置来解释。
早期胆囊切除术是括约肌切开术后胆石症的理想治疗方法。尽管如此,在胆囊切除术的时机方面存在大量临床差异似乎主要取决于医疗机构。