Huang Robert J, Barakat Monique T, Girotra Mohit, Banerjee Subhas
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
Gastroenterology. 2017 Sep;153(3):762-771.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.048. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cholecystectomy (CCY) after an episode of choledocholithiasis requiring endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with stone extraction reduces recurrent biliary events compared to expectant management. We studied practice patterns for performance of CCY after ERCP for choledocholithiasis using data from 3 large states and evaluated the effects of delaying CCY.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the ambulatory surgery, inpatient, and emergency department databases from the states of California (years 2009-2011), New York (2011-2013), and Florida (2012-2014). We collected data from 4516 patients hospitalized with choledocholithiasis who underwent ERCP. We compared outcomes of patients who underwent CCY at index admission (early CCY), elective CCY within 60 days of discharge (delayed CCY), or did not undergo CCY (no CCY), calculating rate of recurrent biliary events (defined as an emergency department visit or unplanned hospitalization due to symptomatic cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, or biliary pancreatitis), mortality, and cost by CCY cohort. We also evaluated risk factors for not undergoing CCY. The primary outcome measure was the rate of recurrent biliary events in the 365 days after discharge from index admission.
Of the patients who underwent ERCP for choledocholithiasis, 41.2% underwent early CCY, 10.9% underwent delayed CCY, and 48.0% underwent no CCY. Early CCY reduced relative risk of recurrent biliary events within 60 days by 92%, compared with delayed or no CCY (P < .001). After 60 days following discharge from index admission, patients with early CCY had an 87% lower risk of recurrent biliary events than patients with no CCY (P < .001) and patients with delayed CCY had an 88% lower risk of recurrent biliary events than patients with no CCY (P < .001). A strategy of delayed CCY performed on an outpatient basis was least costly. Performance of early CCY was inversely associated with low facility volume. Hispanic race, Asian race, Medicaid insurance, and no insurance associated inversely with performance of delayed CCY.
In a retrospective analysis of >4500 patients hospitalized with choledocholithiasis, we found that CCY was not performed after ERCP for almost half of the cases. Although early and delayed CCY equally reduce the risk of subsequent recurrent biliary events, patients are at 10-fold higher risk of recurrent biliary event while waiting for a delayed CCY compared with patients who underwent early CCY. Delayed CCY is a cost-effective strategy that must be balanced against the risk of loss to follow-up, particularly among patients who are ethnic minorities or have little or no health insurance.
与保守治疗相比,在因胆总管结石而行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)取石后进行胆囊切除术(CCY)可减少复发性胆道事件。我们利用来自3个大州的数据研究了ERCP治疗胆总管结石后行CCY的实践模式,并评估了延迟行CCY的影响。
我们使用加利福尼亚州(2009 - 2011年)、纽约州(2011 - 2013年)和佛罗里达州(2012 - 2014年)的门诊手术、住院患者和急诊科数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们收集了4516例因胆总管结石住院并接受ERCP的患者的数据。我们比较了在首次入院时接受CCY(早期CCY)、出院后60天内进行择期CCY(延迟CCY)或未接受CCY(未行CCY)的患者的结局,计算复发性胆道事件发生率(定义为因有症状的胆石症、胆囊炎、胆总管结石、胆管炎或胆源性胰腺炎而到急诊科就诊或计划外住院)、死亡率和按CCY队列划分的费用。我们还评估了未接受CCY的危险因素。主要结局指标是首次入院出院后365天内的复发性胆道事件发生率。
在因胆总管结石接受ERCP的患者中,41.2%接受了早期CCY,10.9%接受了延迟CCY,48.0%未接受CCY。与延迟CCY或未行CCY相比,早期CCY使60天内复发性胆道事件的相对风险降低了92%(P <.001)。首次入院出院后60天,早期CCY患者复发性胆道事件的风险比未行CCY的患者低87%(P <.001),延迟CCY患者复发性胆道事件的风险比未行CCY的患者低88%(P <.001)。门诊进行延迟CCY的策略成本最低。早期CCY的实施与低手术量呈负相关。西班牙裔、亚裔、医疗补助保险和无保险与延迟CCY的实施呈负相关。
在对4500多名因胆总管结石住院患者的回顾性分析中,我们发现近一半的病例在ERCP后未进行CCY。虽然早期和延迟CCY同样能降低随后复发性胆道事件的风险,但与接受早期CCY的患者相比,等待延迟CCY的患者复发性胆道事件的风险高出10倍。延迟CCY是一种具有成本效益的策略,但必须与失访风险相权衡,尤其是在少数民族或几乎没有医疗保险的患者中。