• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水资源综合管理指标的可持续性评估。

Sustainability Assessment of indicators for integrated water resources management.

机构信息

UNESCO Chair on Sustainability, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

UNESCO Chair on Sustainability, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217
PMID:27838052
Abstract

The scientific community strongly recommends the adoption of indicators for the evaluation and monitoring of progress towards sustainable development. Furthermore, international organizations consider that indicators are powerful decision-making tools. Nevertheless, the quality and reliability of the indicators depends on the application of adequate and appropriate criteria to assess them. The general objective of this study was to evaluate how indicators related to water use and management perform against a set of sustainability criteria. Our research identified 170 indicators related to water use and management. These indicators were assessed by an international panel of experts that evaluated whether they fulfil the four sustainability criteria: social, economic, environmental, and institutional. We employed an evaluation matrix that classified all indicators according to the DPSIR (Driving Forces, Pressures, States, Impacts and Responses) framework. A pilot study served to test and approve the research methodology before carrying out the full implementation. The findings of the study show that 24 indicators comply with the majority of the sustainability criteria; 59 indicators are bi-dimensional (meaning that they comply with two sustainability criteria); 86 are one-dimensional indicators (fulfilling just one of the four sustainability criteria) and one indicator do not fulfil any of the sustainability criteria.

摘要

科学界强烈建议采用指标来评估和监测可持续发展的进展。此外,国际组织认为指标是强有力的决策工具。然而,指标的质量和可靠性取决于应用适当和适当的标准来评估它们。本研究的总体目标是评估与水的使用和管理相关的指标在一套可持续性标准下的表现。我们的研究确定了 170 个与水的使用和管理相关的指标。这些指标由一个国际专家小组进行评估,以确定它们是否符合四项可持续性标准:社会、经济、环境和制度。我们使用了一个评估矩阵,根据 DPSIR(驱动力、压力、状态、影响和响应)框架对所有指标进行分类。一项试点研究用于在全面实施之前测试和批准研究方法。研究结果表明,24 个指标符合大多数可持续性标准;59 个指标是二维的(这意味着它们符合两个可持续性标准);86 个是一维指标(仅满足四个可持续性标准中的一个),一个指标不符合任何可持续性标准。

相似文献

1
Sustainability Assessment of indicators for integrated water resources management.水资源综合管理指标的可持续性评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:139-147. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Pathways to water sustainability? A global study assessing the benefits of integrated water resources management.通往水资源可持续性的途径?一项评估水资源综合管理效益的全球研究。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 1;343:118179. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118179. Epub 2023 May 29.
3
Adaptive capacity indicators to assess sustainability of urban water systems - Current application.适应能力指标评估城市水系统的可持续性——当前应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 1;569-570:751-761. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.088. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
4
Framework for measuring sustainable development in catchment systems.流域系统可持续发展衡量框架。
Environ Manage. 2002 Feb;29(2):195-206. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0020-4.
5
6
Index-based Groundwater Sustainability Assessment in the Socio-Economic Context: a Case Study in the Western Iran.基于指数的社会经济背景下地下水可持续性评估:以伊朗西部为例。
Environ Manage. 2021 Apr;67(4):648-666. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01424-7. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Groundwater sustainability assessment framework: A demonstration of environmental sustainability index for Hanoi, Vietnam.地下水可持续性评估框架:越南河内环境可持续性指数的示范。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Jul 1;241:479-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.117. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
8
Sustainability assessment of water management at river basin level: Concept, methodology and application.流域层面水资源管理的可持续性评估:概念、方法和应用。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 15;316:115201. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115201. Epub 2022 May 10.
9
The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland.巴西和苏格兰水资源管理可持续性指标的发展与应用。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):1190-201. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
10
A modified eco-efficiency framework and methodology for advancing the state of practice of sustainability analysis as applied to green infrastructure.一种经过改进的生态效率框架和方法,用于推动应用于绿色基础设施的可持续性分析的实践水平。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Sep;13(5):821-831. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1928. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying deep learning to manage urban ecosystems in arid Abha, Saudi Arabia: Remote sensing-based modelling for ecological condition assessment and decision-making.将深度学习应用于沙特阿拉伯干旱地区阿卜哈的城市生态系统管理:基于遥感的生态状况评估与决策建模。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 14;10(4):e25731. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25731. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
2
Rethinking the design of resilience and adaptation indicators supporting coastal communities.重新思考支持沿海社区的恢复力和适应指标的设计。
J Environ Plan Manag. 2022;65(12):2297-2317. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1971635. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
3
Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective.
组织韧性与社会经济可持续性:新冠疫情视角
Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(8):12006-12023. doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-01154-6. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Evaluating Sustainability of Regional Water Resources Based on Improved Generalized Entropy Method.基于改进广义熵方法的区域水资源可持续性评价
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Sep 18;20(9):715. doi: 10.3390/e20090715.
5
Can we take the pulse of environmental governance the way we take the pulse of nature? Applying the Freshwater Health Index in Latin America.我们能否像监测大自然的脉搏那样监测环境治理的情况?在拉丁美洲应用淡水健康指数。
Ambio. 2021 Apr;50(4):870-883. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01407-8. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
6
Urban water systems: Development of micro-level indicators to support integrated policy.城市水系统:开发微观指标以支持综合政策。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 24;15(2):e0228295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228295. eCollection 2020.
7
Proposal for a National Blueprint Framework to Monitor Progress on Water-Related Sustainable Development Goals in Europe.关于监测欧洲水相关可持续发展目标进展情况的国家蓝图框架的提案。
Environ Manage. 2020 Jan;65(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01231-1. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators.评估可持续饮食方法和潜在的协调指标的发展综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 2;16(7):1184. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071184.
9
Water Sustainability at the River Grande Basin, Brazil: An Approach Based on the Barometer of Sustainability.巴西格兰德河盆地的水可持续性:基于可持续性晴雨表的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 19;15(11):2582. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112582.
10
Assessment of Water Resources Sustainability in Mainland China in Terms of Water Intensity and Efficiency.评估中国大陆水资源的可持续性:从用水强度和效率的角度。
Environ Manage. 2019 Mar;63(3):309-321. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1098-2. Epub 2018 Sep 21.