Bone and Joint Research Unit. IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz UAM and Cooperative Research Thematic Network on Aging and Frailty (RETICEF), Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2017 Jan 5;794:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
Osteoarthritis is the most common chronic joint disorder especially during aging. Although with controversies, glucosamine, both in its forms of sulfate and hydrochloride, and chondroitin sulfate are commonly employed to treat osteoarthritis. Due to the modest improve in the symptoms observed in patients treated with these drugs alone, a formulation combining both agents has been considered. The discrepant results achieved for pain control or structural improvement in osteoarthritis patients has been attributed to the quality of chemical formulations or different bias in clinical studies. The current study has been designed to test the effects of two different combined formulations with adequate pharmaceutical grade of these drugs in osteoarthritic joints, and to explore the underlying mechanisms modulated by both formulations in different osteoarthritis target tissues. Knee osteoarthritis was surgically induced in experimental rabbits. Some animals received the combined therapy (CT)1, (chondroitin sulfate 1200mg/day + glucosamine sulfate 1500mg/day), or the CT2 ((chondroitin sulfate 1200mg/day + glucosamine hydrochloride 1500mg/day). Neither CT1 nor CT2 significantly modified the cartilage damage or the synovial inflammation observed in osteoarthritic animals. Treatments were also unable to modify the presence of pro-inflammatory mediators, and the synthesis of metalloproteinases in the cartilage or in the synovium of osteoarthritic animals. Combined therapies did not modify the decrease in the subchondral bone mineral density observed in osteoarthritic rabbits. Therapies of chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine sulfate or chondroitin sulfate plus glucosamine hydrochloride failed to improve structural damage or to ameliorate the inflammatory profile of joint tissues during experimental osteoarthritis.
骨关节炎是最常见的慢性关节疾病,尤其在老年人中更为常见。尽管存在争议,但硫酸氨基葡萄糖和盐酸氨基葡萄糖以及硫酸软骨素通常被用于治疗骨关节炎。由于单独使用这些药物治疗患者的症状改善幅度较小,因此考虑使用联合两种药物的配方。导致骨关节炎患者在疼痛控制或结构改善方面取得的结果不一致的原因,归因于化学配方的质量或临床研究中的不同偏差。本研究旨在测试两种不同的联合配方在骨关节炎关节中的效果,这些配方具有足够的这些药物的药物级质量,并探讨两种配方在不同的骨关节炎靶组织中调节的潜在机制。在实验兔中通过手术诱导膝关节骨关节炎。一些动物接受联合治疗(CT)1,(硫酸软骨素 1200mg/天+硫酸氨基葡萄糖 1500mg/天),或 CT2((硫酸软骨素 1200mg/天+盐酸氨基葡萄糖 1500mg/天)。CT1 或 CT2 均未显著改变骨关节炎动物中观察到的软骨损伤或滑膜炎症。治疗也无法改变软骨或滑膜中促炎介质的存在以及金属蛋白酶的合成。联合治疗也未能改变骨关节炎兔中观察到的软骨下骨矿物质密度降低。硫酸软骨素加氨基葡萄糖硫酸盐或硫酸软骨素加盐酸氨基葡萄糖的治疗未能改善结构损伤或改善实验性骨关节炎关节组织的炎症特征。