• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旨在提高中学生身体活动水平和幸福感的两项教育干预措施的整群随机对照试验:MOVE项目。

Clustered randomised controlled trial of two education interventions designed to increase physical activity and well-being of secondary school students: the MOVE Project.

作者信息

Tymms Peter B, Curtis Sarah E, Routen Ash C, Thomson Katie H, Bolden David S, Bock Susan, Dunn Christine E, Cooper Ashley R, Elliott Julian G, Moore Helen J, Summerbell Carolyn D, Tiffin Paul A, Kasim Adetayo S

机构信息

School of Education, University of Durham, Durham, UK.

Department of Geography, University of Durham, Durham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 6;6(1):e009318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009318.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009318
PMID:26739729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4716156/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of 2 interventions in improving the physical activity and well-being of secondary school children.

DESIGN

A clustered randomised controlled trial; classes, 1 per school, were assigned to 1 of 3 intervention arms or a control group based on a 2×2 factorial design. The interventions were peer-mentoring and participative learning. Year 7 children (aged 11-12) in the peer-mentoring intervention were paired with year 9 children for 6 weekly mentoring meetings. Year 7 children in the participative learning arm took part in 6 weekly geography lessons using personalised physical activity and Global Positioning System (GPS) data. Year 7 children in the combined intervention received both interventions, with the year 9 children only participating in the mentoring sessions.

PARTICIPANTS

1494 year 7 students from 60 schools in the North of England took part in the trial. Of these, 43 students opted out of taking part in the evaluation measurements, 2 moved teaching group and 58 changed school. Valid accelerometry outcome data were collected for 892 students from 53 schools; and well-being outcome data were available for 927 students from 52 schools.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were mean minutes of accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity per day, and well-being as evaluated by the KIDSCREEN-27 questionnaire. These data were collected 6 weeks after the intervention; a 12-month follow-up is planned.

RESULTS

No significant effects (main or interaction) were observed for the outcomes. However, small positive differences were found for both outcomes for the participative learning intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the 2 school-based interventions did not modify levels of physical activity or well-being within the period monitored. Change in physical activity may require more comprehensive individual behavioural intervention, and/or more system-based efforts to address wider environmental influences such as family, peers, physical environment, transport and educational policy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN82956355.

摘要

目的

评估两种干预措施对改善中学生身体活动和幸福感的效果。

设计

一项整群随机对照试验;每所学校的一个班级根据2×2析因设计被分配到3个干预组或一个对照组中的一组。干预措施为同伴辅导和参与式学习。同伴辅导干预组的7年级儿童(11 - 12岁)与9年级儿童配对,每周进行6次辅导会议。参与式学习组的7年级儿童参加为期6周的地理课程,课程使用个性化身体活动和全球定位系统(GPS)数据。联合干预组的7年级儿童接受两种干预,9年级儿童仅参与辅导课程。

参与者

来自英格兰北部60所学校的1494名7年级学生参与了试验。其中,43名学生选择不参与评估测量,2名学生更换了教学组,58名学生转学。从53所学校的892名学生中收集了有效的加速度计结果数据;从52所学校的927名学生中获取了幸福感结果数据。

主要结局指标

主要结局为加速度计测量的每天中等至剧烈强度身体活动的平均分钟数,以及通过儿童生活质量量表(KIDSCREEN - 27)问卷评估的幸福感。这些数据在干预6周后收集;计划进行12个月的随访。

结果

未观察到结局有显著影响(主要效应或交互效应)。然而,参与式学习干预在两个结局上均发现了小的正向差异。

结论

这些结果表明,在监测期内,这两种基于学校的干预措施并未改变身体活动水平或幸福感。身体活动的改变可能需要更全面的个体行为干预,和/或更多基于系统的努力,以应对更广泛的环境影响,如家庭、同伴、物理环境、交通和教育政策。

试验注册号

ISRCTN82956355

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11d/4716156/f8adbc1fc7b5/bmjopen2015009318f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11d/4716156/f8adbc1fc7b5/bmjopen2015009318f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d11d/4716156/f8adbc1fc7b5/bmjopen2015009318f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Clustered randomised controlled trial of two education interventions designed to increase physical activity and well-being of secondary school students: the MOVE Project.旨在提高中学生身体活动水平和幸福感的两项教育干预措施的整群随机对照试验:MOVE项目。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 6;6(1):e009318. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009318.
2
An Internet-supported Physical Activity Intervention Delivered in Secondary Schools Located in Low Socio-economic Status Communities: Study Protocol for the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一项在社会经济地位较低社区的中学开展的互联网支持的体育活动干预:体育活动与动机(AMPED)整群随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 6;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2583-7.
3
An RCT to Facilitate Implementation of School Practices Known to Increase Physical Activity.一项促进增加身体活动的学校实践实施的 RCT。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):818-828. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial.旨在增加儿童身体活动、减少久坐行为和增加水果与蔬菜摄入量的干预措施对儿童的影响:积极生活 5 年(AFLY5)基于学校的群组随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3256.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: A cluster randomised controlled trial.促进英国青少年增加身体活动的 GoActive 干预措施的有效性和成本效益:一项集群随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 23;17(7):e1003210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003210. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Protocol for the 'Virtual Traveller' cluster-randomised controlled trial: a behaviour change intervention to increase physical activity in primary-school Maths and English lessons.“虚拟旅行者”整群随机对照试验方案:一项行为改变干预措施,旨在增加小学英语和数学课上的身体活动量
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 27;6(6):e011982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011982.
7
The Physical Activity 4 Everyone Cluster Randomized Trial: 2-Year Outcomes of a School Physical Activity Intervention Among Adolescents.全民体育活动整群随机试验:青少年学校体育活动干预的两年成果
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Aug;51(2):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.02.020. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial of the GoActive intervention aiming to promote physical activity among adolescents: outcomes and lessons learnt.旨在促进青少年身体活动的GoActive干预措施的可行性研究及试点整群随机对照试验:结果与经验教训
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 11;6(11):e012335. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012335.
9
10
Examining reach, dose, and fidelity of the "Girls on the Move" after-school physical activity club: a process evaluation.考察“运动女孩”课外体育活动俱乐部的覆盖范围、剂量和保真度:一项过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 30;16:671. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3329-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of peer-led health behaviour interventions on adolescent's mental health and wellbeing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴主导的健康行为干预对青少年心理健康和幸福的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 12;15(1):16480. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01053-8.
2
Effectiveness of Intervention Strategies to Increase Adolescents' Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Time in Secondary School Settings, Including Factors Related to Implementation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中学环境中增加青少年身体活动和减少久坐时间的干预策略的有效性,包括与实施相关的因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Sports Med Open. 2024 Mar 13;10(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00688-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How Does Physical Activity Intervention Improve Self-Esteem and Self-Concept in Children and Adolescents? Evidence from a Meta-Analysis.体育活动干预如何改善儿童和青少年的自尊和自我概念?一项元分析的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 4;10(8):e0134804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134804. eCollection 2015.
2
Mental Health Difficulties in Early Adolescence: A Comparison of Two Cross-Sectional Studies in England From 2009 to 2014.青少年早期的心理健康问题:2009 年至 2014 年在英格兰进行的两项横断面研究的比较。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 May;56(5):502-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.023.
3
Annual research review: Secular trends in child and adolescent mental health.
Effectiveness of Health Promotion Interventions in Primary Schools-A Mixed Methods Literature Review.
小学健康促进干预措施的有效性——一项混合方法文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;11(13):1817. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131817.
4
Youth and Peer Mentor Led Interventions to Improve Biometric-, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Psychosocial-Related Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.青年和同伴导师主导的干预措施对改善儿童和青少年的生物计量、营养、身体活动和心理社会相关结果的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 7;15(12):2658. doi: 10.3390/nu15122658.
5
The Effects of the ACTIVE VALUES Program on Psychosocial Aspects and Executive Functions.ACTIVE VALUES 计划对心理社会方面和执行功能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010595.
6
Features of effective staff training programmes within school-based interventions targeting student activity behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对学生活动行为的基于学校的干预措施中有效员工培训计划的特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Sep 24;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01361-6.
7
A Systematic Literature Review of Peer-led Strategies for Promoting Physical Activity Levels of Adolescents.同伴主导策略促进青少年身体活动水平的系统文献综述
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Feb;49(1):41-53. doi: 10.1177/10901981211044988. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
8
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.
9
Characteristics and practices of school-based cluster randomised controlled trials for improving health outcomes in pupils in the United Kingdom: a methodological systematic review.英国以学校为基础的整群随机对照试验改善学生健康结局的特征与实践:一项方法学系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01348-0.
10
Considerations for Individual-Level Versus Whole-School Physical Activity Interventions: Stakeholder Perspectives.考虑个体层面与全校层面体育活动干预措施:利益相关者视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 18;18(14):7628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147628.
年度研究综述:儿童和青少年心理健康的长期趋势。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;56(3):370-93. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12372. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
4
Daylight saving time as a potential public health intervention: an observational study of evening daylight and objectively-measured physical activity among 23,000 children from 9 countries.夏令时作为一种潜在的公共卫生干预措施:一项对来自9个国家的23000名儿童的傍晚日光与客观测量的身体活动的观察性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Oct 23;11:84. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-84.
5
Why schools should promote students' health and wellbeing.学校为何应促进学生的健康与幸福。
BMJ. 2014 May 13;348:g3078. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3078.
6
Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? A systematic review.21世纪儿童和青少年心理健康问题在增加吗?一项系统综述。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;48(7):606-16. doi: 10.1177/0004867414533834. Epub 2014 May 14.
7
Towards uniform accelerometry analysis: a standardization methodology to minimize measurement bias due to systematic accelerometer wear-time variation.面向统一的加速度计分析:一种标准化方法,以最小化由于系统加速度计佩戴时间变化而导致的测量偏差。
J Sports Sci Med. 2014 May 1;13(2):379-86. eCollection 2014 May.
8
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告:干预描述和复制(TIDieR)清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
9
Levels and patterns of objectively-measured physical activity volume and intensity distribution in UK adolescents: the ROOTS study.英国青少年客观测量的身体活动量及强度分布水平与模式:根源研究
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Feb 24;11:23. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-23.
10
How active are our children? Findings from the Millennium Cohort Study.我们的孩子有多活跃?千禧年队列研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 21;3(8):e002893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002893.